wpeB.jpg (1573 bytes)

  BETRAYAL and
 OPPRESSION:

            Humpty-Dumpty
    Must You Die?

 

 

 

RETURN TO
The BOOKS
   

 
 

 

RETURN TO
HUMPTY-DUMPTY

 

 

F Click on the ICONS for further information E
************************************

 

 

1

      Ultimate Betrayals  
 

2

      A Woman Scorned  
 

3

      Appearances Betrayed  
 

4

     Solicitations  
 

5

     Victime Suprême  
 

6

     The Fatal Flaw   
 

7

     W W W ?  
 

8

     The Aftermath  
 

9

     In Retrospect  
 

10

     Yes, I Must Die  
 

11

     Was Anything Learned  
         

 

ab

BETRAYAL and
OPPRESSION:


Humpty-Dumpty
Must You
Die?

 

 Joseph Walker, Ph.D.
Cedar Crest, New Mexico

2000

 

 

BETRAYAL and OPPRESSION:
Humpty-Dumpty Must You Die?
     by Joseph Walker, Ph.D.

Copyright © 2000  by: Joseph L. Walker, Jr., Ph.D.

All rights reserved under International
and Pan American Copyright Conventions
No part of this book may be reproduced
in any form—except for brief quotations
(not to exceed 1000 words) in a review or
professional work—without permission
in writing from the author.

Library of Congress
Catalogue Card Number:  00-91338

Printed in the United States of America
on acid free paper

Cover Design by John Anthony Howell

 

 


To:

The  BETRAYED
who TOO OFTEN DIE
IN SOLITUDE


 

Thanks to...

John for his enduring love

DIANN FOR HER LOVING FRIENDSHIP

BARBARA FOR SIMPLY BEING THERE

Marsena, My spiritual mother

JOANNE, FOR HER SHOULDER


DAVID FOR WANTING ME TO LIVE
Dennis for his friendship
Mark, the lifesaver

BOB, MY BROTHER


Loving, Caring Friends

NONA, Don, Jan
DORIS, Rita, RONA

 

 


PREFACE

     It is certainly very difficult for anyone to disclose fully, their most inner thoughts and feelings with any degree of actual candor without wondering just how others might perceive and interpret these uncensored and candidly disclosed thoughts and feelings. I have continued this risky business of exposing my more than honest vulnerability because I hold to the belief that what I have to share with you is still well worth the many and sometimes fatal costs involved. I had begun writing this third volume because I truly had hoped to finally resolve the serious conflicts I had been experiencing in conjunction with my now failed association with the American Orchid Society (AOS) over the past nine years. The total annihilation of my good character, malicious violations of my privacy, and the most grave discrimination regarding my intrinsic life-style--which ultimately served to prevent me from advancing within the AOS judging program--continues to plague and haunt my most inner thoughts. The lingering mental anguish and dire damage inflicted on this now totally shattered Humpty-Dumpty continues to foster the nagging ideation of self-termination.
     What is written in these following pages is a continuation of the lurid bigotry that I have so sadly experienced. The first volume, Unwritten Rules, clearly established the presence and practice of white-collar bigotry and its inevitable devastating effects on the individual, both physically and psychologically. The second volume, The Freedom Seeker, attempted to share with you how one person had set out to resolve that awesome injustice. Most interesting about that treacherous journey was the arduous process of legally representing yourself in a Federal District Court. Pro Se is the lucid term and despite the simplicity and brevity of this term, the process had been an almost overwhelming but sometimes inspiring challenge. At least I thought it was fortunate for me that the situation changed, and two enthusiastic lawyers came aboard at a decisive moment in the proceedings.
     The bleak reality was encountered when I found that even within our Federal system of justice the bigoted inhumanity of even our supposedly ethically imbued professionals sadly reflected the continued antipathy and mistreatment of the oppressed. Reading the first two books would certainly give you an improved insight and knowledge that would probably make this present volume a little more meaningful and certainly more in context of the whole disconcerting and abashing narrative.
     The title of this present volume really says it all in the most definitive terms that I had not at all initially imagined would be so foreboding. Our internal compasses are probably more attuned to reality than any of us really wish to recognize. I had insightfully declared in the opening of the first book the likely psychological proposition that most of us otherwise mentally healthy individuals never readily admit to ourselves the disconcerting realities of our sometimes privately desperate lives. Men above woman are often encouraged to withhold their feelings from any overt display in an effort to give the impression of masculine strength. Despite the fact that I wasn’t to have shown any signs of weakness by shedding tears, I cried more than ever during this trying period of time than I had at any other stage of this awfully arduous scenario. So very arduous in fact that the question of Humpty-Dumpty having to die may just become an inescapable truth.

 

PROLOGUE

     Father, Father, why has thou forsaken me? I am writing this sad continuation with the hopes that the terribly damaging situations of the more than subtle bigotry that I had found myself experiencing at the hands of the American Orchid Society (AOS) would finally come to some reasonable resolve. Bondage in any of its many forms certainly places limits on the expression of an individual's potential and can crush the very life forces that give rise to one's own perceived meaning and purpose.
     This devastating experience has taught me so much about the sad state of our society and the awful plight of spiritually and ideologically enslaved humankind. I appropriately titled this last volume the Betrayal and Oppression because I have finally came to a place in my own life where I began fully realize the awful predicament of so many disenfranchised people. People are endlessly enslaved by engraved images that they have been taught to believe are a true and accurate representation of some Devine truth. Whatever many of us might believe about our responsibility of being our brother's keeper, it appears that we have forsaken that idea in favor of some selfish ideology that serves our own survivable. I can't blame anyone for having lost their faith in their neighbors to support and defend them in times of need. It just doesn't happen and we have all become too suspicious of anyone that claims they are truly altruistic. Having had this awful experience where so many once trusted friends have betrayed me and even become some of my persecutors, I find myself very isolated and apart from the very world that I had once wanted to be a part of for the remaining years of my life.
     I was fully prepared by my upbringing to actually "Love my neighbor…" and reap the promised reward of joy. Instead, I uncannily found a living image of Humpty-Dumpty to best explain how too many of my neighbors feel and relate within this too often hostile world. I fear that all the King's horses, all the King's men, all the King's money and all the King's courts of justice can't possibly put me back together again. What ever happened to human compassion in our beloved Garden of Eden?

 

COMPLETED PORTIONS OF THE BOOK

 

          
             
ULTIMATE  BETRAYALS

     Father, Father, why has thou forsaken me? It was on the first day of March 2000 that I had received a most disturbing letter from my own council, Tony Romo that had felt too much like multiple stabs in the heart. I had just returned from a trip to Phoenix, where I had hoped to recover from four days of that grueling deposition of which I was the sole subject of a malicious and maligned Defense. Though I was not at all surprised by this most typical and despicable strategy employed by defense teams in name of that ennoble American postulate of offering the accused the very best defense 'that money can buy,' I was appalled that our American judicial system's rules of law permitted a victim/plaintiff to undergo such relentless and unnecessary attacks in the revered name of justice. In these instances of justice? I fear that Justice herself becomes a despicable whore that unquestionably prostituted the very heart of what should be a system of equal justice under the law.  The whole process of discovery should be a relentless effort at uncovering the truth, instead, it has become an opened playing-field for either side to address any issue that might discredit the opposition without addressing the substantive issues of the case itself. I had brought this action against the American Orchid Society specifically because I had been so mentally and emotionally brutalized by the relentless defamation, discrimination, and the broad disbursement of private facts in disclosing of my HIV/AIDS status. This devastating letter was faxed to me and was totally unexpected. It sent me into such a dark depression that it totally immobilized me from accomplishing anything for almost an entire week. The one exception was my having finished the previous book on that most sad note of my last will and testament.
     The tone of the letter raised serious questions as to whether I could continue to have trusted even Tony Rome with the very execution of this case. There were thankfully five very loyal and trusted confidants that with great concern for my very survival, arose to caringly address my deep depression and together with their moral support I composed the following letter to Mr. Romo:

(JLW,PhD Letterhead)

March 4, 2000

Via Facsimile #555-3366 and First Class U.S. Mail
Attorney/client Privileged/Confidential
Mr. Anthony Lawrence Romo
Romo & Associates
Post Office Box xxxxx
Albuquerque, NM xxxxx

Re: J. Lamah vs. John Kramer, MD et al.,
In The USDC For The District of New
Mexico, Cause No. CIV 98-1403 BB/KBM

Dear Tony:

     I'm sure you know that I have always made it a point of respect to talk face-to-face with anyone with whom I had a subject matter that required such a forum. That should have been most evident with my recent trip to Oklahoma only to have attempted to speak with a potential witness. Your very disturbing, faxed letter of March 1, 2000 afforded me no due respect. The overall feel of the letter sent me into one very deep depression with overwhelming desires to end my life. It was only the caring intervention of five friends that had saved the day. You owe them a great deal of gratitude for having saved my life!
     It was observed by one of these dear friends that this now-shared case had probably started out as being substantially of a legal/justice nature first and then financial second. It seems to have deteriorated to being financial first and substantially legal/justice second. I am offended that you would address an issue that "this is not about money" in a manner that grossly indicts my character with the implication that this case isn't anything except that. I spent six grueling years earnestly attempting to correct the foulness in the AOS with all sorts of other demands far apart from money. It is the legal system that you so well represent that only seems to respond to money and any lawsuit filed that does not substantially seek fiscal compensation has no standing with the Court. You should know, as a lawyer that even in Federal Court there are minimum standards of fiscal damages required of civil cases before they can be considered. Don't place that dreaded monkey on my back, it's a gross insult.
     My residence, San Damiano, is something very sacred to me. It was approximately sixteen years ago that I first walked on the property and my initial responses were: "This is a place of healing." And, "Although I will never own this place, I will be its consummate caretaker." When I had shared my rather unusual experience of San Damiano with Father Luna of the Old Town Church, he offered me a relic from his church to be placed in the home until a San Damiano cross could be secured from the Fathers in Italy. I later discussed with my sister the possibility of leaving this home to a "San Damiano Foundation" that had both a spiritual purpose as well as something to do with orchids. Your insensitive request that my sister and I place a mortgage on this property is like asking the Pope to place a mortgage on the Vatican. This home is not available as a ransom to any cause.
     I had elected to proceed with this case "that was not about money" as a Pro Se litigant essentially because I could not find a competent lawyer that would take on this cause on a contingency, much less a lawyer who had the necessary competency and passion of trying such a case. The sad fact that I don't personally have the funds to pay a lawyer is precisely why I initially attempted this project with the help of those who might have been available out of the kindness of their heart and hopefully, shared my passion for justice. That was were Bob Foster had entered the picture. You may recall how we first met and I initially judged your generous charity at New Mexico AIDS Services as the kind of quality that I have always appreciated in my more compassionate fellow human beings. I had immediately confirmed my deep appreciation by initiating the opportunity of your becoming my ATΩ fraternity brother.
     It was YOU who had suggested that you would take on this case and that you were willing to take the case on a contingency basis. I agreed to your invitation in good faith after consulting the other players that had significantly contributed to my cause. I was initially shocked when you faxed the contingency agreement to be signed and returned, to find that the word contingency only included your professional services and not any of the expenses. Other firms often take on clients that cannot manage the financial burden of a lawsuit and even the expenses are born by the Firm. I felt that I had been so fooled by my own ignorance into agreeing to be responsible for all of the expenses that I couldn't even face you at that luncheon. Instead I headed for California to walk off into the Pacific Ocean and end this misery that I have been enduring for too many years at the expense and sacrifice of my health.
     My solution to that overwhelming financial situation was to write that letter seeking help from my friends only to receive another caustic letter from you scolding me for having not consulted you. You had initially wanted my mailing list so that you could have written my friends and explained to them that there was no assurance of winning the lawsuit, etc. I appreciated your need to have been in control of you client, but I had been made desperate by the unexpected terms of your contingency agreement. When I later explained my motivation to you sitting right here in my library, you very compassionately stated that when you take on a client, that you see the case through to the end despite the possibility of their eventual inability to pay. You said that when the money ran out from the funds I was seeking from my friends that your Firm would be responsibly to pay the expenses and that I would be responsible to reimburse the Firm at the conclusion of the lawsuit at a rate of fifteen percent. You asked me very specifically not to worry about the lack of funds. The only thing that remained for me to worry about was the lack of any stated cap on the expenditure of funds. Your last bill showed fax costs at $ 1.00 per sheet and though this might be reasonable for Kinko's, I find it a little startling since I had begun this effort on the idea of keeping actual costs to a minimum. I realize it is within range and I'm sure that the Defense bills the AOS in equal amounts, but I would rather spend less in gas and pick up copies at your office and make the deliveries for you to keep costs to a minimum.
     Now, you began to sound too much like Lee McAnena that was so offended that I lived in such a beautiful home and that I must be some kind of unscrupulous scoundrel to have been getting my meds "at taxpayer expense." Even Ned Shepherd had posed the sarcastic question on the last day of the deposition of whether it might be possible to sell "my home" in order to pay for these medications that, by the way, I stopped taking last Wednesday when I had received your letter. I didn't want to live any longer and felt betrayed. More than betrayed, I felt like I was being extorted with the very mention of "the fact that the inconsistent position taken by you as to ownership of 33 Boulder Lane, Cedar Crest, New Mexico as between State of New Mexico social services officials and on you federal and state income tax returns…" I have never been inconsistent at all and the whole issue of ownership was in no way related to social services that only entered the picture some three years ago long after I had meticulously handled my estate under the duress of the knowledge that I was probably not going to have lived much longer. It's the job of the Defense to attempt to discredit me and having the same misrepresentation of the material presented to me by my own lawyer is a serious and insensitive affront.
     I have never defaulted on any of my responsibilities even in situations where I could have possibly recovered loses that I simply turned the other cheek and bore the burden myself due to my own good nature. It was precisely that my cherished dignity based on a lifetime of benevolence and the relentless defense of others, which was so grossly and unnecessarily violated by the American Orchid Society that this lawsuit came about. The tone of your letter left me disappointingly puzzled and I had only hoped that it was only a temporary lapse of judgement on your part. I'm writing all of this down with the thought that I will probably not actually fax or mail it to you before I have shown you more respect than you cared to show me and simply sit down and attempt to resolve the situation.
     I can appreciate your concern about the finances. It has always been front and center with my own apprehensions about the outcome of this lawsuit. We need to separate these financial items and concerns from the successful execution of the lawsuit.
     I had absolutely no agenda of making defamatory comments that only came after relentless efforts at resolving some of the problems with the AOS. Under the circumstances, I feel no need to defend any of my actions, even the filing of a lawsuit, which Shannon had indicted me as being mean spirited. She had very sarcastically implied that I should have been that loving Christian and kept turning the other cheek indefinitely since the Bible had put no limit on the number of times one should simply take the beatings of the oppressors. Remember the dedication of the two books: "To the oppressed who too often suffer in quiet desperation." I am speaking out for all of those who are compelled under duress to keep turning the other cheek and to those to whom I speak out—the oppressors—they do not deserve anything but the truth and the truth of the matter is that they are all despicable. Please suggest nicer terms that describe awful situations and behaviors—they simply don't exist. I have even less respect for those who defend their despicable behavior. I am equally offended when the legal system demonstrates the same degree of bigoted behavior as in the case of the first Magistrate Judge assigned to this case. Please don't attempt to remind me that this is simply the way things are. I know that, but I don't intend to accept it without a fight and a fight that cannot be won on their own ground. This case was brought about by me to fight that very passive acceptance of white-collar bigotry. Jesus himself rebuked the devil and identified wrongdoing for exactly what it was. Even Ned Shepherd had cracked an approving smile when Shannon asked for my explanation of calling her bosses "legal pimps." As I had stated in my deposition, the term wasn't taken by me as anything defamatory, it was simply and only descriptive. I stand firmly on everything I have ever said under these extraordinary circumstances.
     There have never been any significant changes in the behavior of the oppressors of this world unless the oppressed stepped out the rules that had only been created to maintain the power of the oppressors. The successful execution of this case requires someone with extraordinary passion for doing the right thing. You may remember that I gave you a copy of Jerry Spence's book and suggested that I like his extraordinary approach to cases. I don't expect you to imitate anyone else. What I wold like to see from you, is such an exceptional performance that it possibly makes jurisprudence history. I have even suggested that in that you and I might even co-author a third book to document the case—does that sound like greed for money?
     I had thought that we might have shared in this passion? Recently, ou seemed to have been distracted by the Defense and rightfully so but possibly not to the point of discrediting your own client. I still stand by everything that I reported to have happened in this case and I make no excuses for the successes of the Defense to undo, sometimes in a most questionable manner, some of my most pointed contentions. I feel we have reacted to their efforts rather that had made a concerted effort to shore up what should have been addressed possibly earlier when I had been made aware of various situations. It's now all water under the bridge and I have even been resolving myself to the fact that this case will probably not achieve any of my original goals of justice for others. I am most of the time resolved to live through the duration of this trial just to honor my contract with you. But I have even a lesser desire to remain on this earth after the trial's conclusion, having totally failed to achieve any of my original goals, none of WHICH had anything to do with just the money!
     I am quiet prepared to proceed with our original agreement and the terms that you had proposed to me orally in my home so long as you feel that you can continue with a strong resolve to bring this case to a successful conclusion. I am willing to give it all my remaining energy so long as I am treated with due respect. I have suffered the ultimate insults in this case by the Defendants and their council and I most definitely have no intention of being furthered disrespected by my own council.

Most Depressingly & Despairingly,

   
Joe
Joseph L. Walker Jr.

cc: Robert Foster, Esq. (via facsimile #266-8797 only)

      I never faxed or even sent the above letter, as it was dated. I just didn't want to handle this awkward situation in the same insensitive manner that Tony had addressed it. Instead, I later intended to have taken two copies of my letter to our next regular weekly Thursday (3/9/00) evening session and presented them to Tony and Bob Foster, the legal researcher on our legal team of three. I had had the idea that I would have then departed that appointed session and leave to them to decide for themselves as to whether they really wished to have continued with the original contingency agreement. I had hoped that the letter would have expressed exactly where I had firmly stood on the matter and the specific conditions under which I felt comfortable with and confident in their continuing the case. I have never cared for anyone who attempts to change the course of or agreed upon conditions of a situation in midstream. Of course, Tony Romo kept insisting and implying that I had somehow presented him with a case that had to be totally reconstructed in order for him to continue successfully. I had presented him my Pro Se case very much in earnest, but it was totally his own suggestion that I turn the matter fully over to him for his informed and professional execution. I think that much of the problem probably arose out of the typical opinion of too many well-trained lawyers believing that they alone have the ability to think logically and legally. That thinking is probably well founded in most cases and Tony just hadn't come to the full realization that I had been so well trained and personally tutored in the skillful art of mental maneuvering and synthesis. And most importantly, I was confident that Tony, despite his own lifestyle and desire to have a significant impact on the discrimination against gays and others, had, after all, been too skillfully trained in that revered establishment Georgetown law school. He had most likely encountered an education that no doubt duly instructed him to march to an established and recognized drummer that was probably more attuned to the good old boy's status quo of still favoring and often unknowingly supported the legal oppression of any and all minorities.
      On the Tuesday morning before this letter I had had my first scheduled session with the psychologist that had been engaged by the Defense to evaluate me. We had started the session on a confrontational note due to my having wanted to record the session in order to protect my own interests. On Monday I had faxed Tony a note requesting that he address this matter and perhaps have permission for me to do the recording. I had never received a reply, which left me on my own. As fate would have it, Dr. Roll insisted that recording the session would biased the outcome since the tests he was administering had been standardized without any recording. Of course, this first session hadn't involved any tests that had been standardized and could have been easily recorded. I suspected that Dr. Roll didn't want to be held accountable for his possibly biased findings and certainly the testimony of a paid professional would have more weight if there were no remaining evidence to the contrary. The fact that I had been left on my own gave me the feeling of abandonment on the part of Tony.
     
I slept restlessly that Wednesday night after having received that letter for what little time I was able to actually doze off.  I awoke at 4:45 A.M. following one of the weirdest dreams.  I'm sure the dream had occurred due to that particular portion of the emotionally painful deposition, where I had been unjustly required to answer inappropriate questions about my private sex life that I had seriously felt were so totally reprehensible.  I had felt maliciously raped once again at that time and this dream had awaken me to a sexually aroused state where I had then reached an induced sexual climax that produced no seminal fluids.  Very, very strange for me!  I had the strange sense of being totally undefended and notably felt that Tony had left me pitifully exposed to a painfully and emotionally inflicted torture that had surpassed even the maliciously inflicted barbs of the American Orchid Society.  I recalled that he had not responded to my written request to have the sessions with that psychologist recorded so that I could have later more easily and successfully defended myself against some intentionally wrongful and certainly subjective interpretation.  He had specifically and notably suggested that if I had physically tired during any portion of the deposition due to my compromised HIV/AIDS status that we might have to have shortened some of the sessions.  But when it came to the brutal mental harassment that was far more damaging to my overall well being including my very tenuous health than absolutely anything physically taxing, there was no attempted intervention on my behalf.  It felt that he had possibly and inadvertently become part of the relentless beating.  All of this, I was told was perfectly acceptable under the current rules of law.  Just how barbaric has our American system of justice become?  And how pathetically distressing that it is of no surprise considering its noted and continuing bias in too many parts of our diverse country.  It was my unfulfilled hope that the Federal Court system and its practicing officers (the lawyers included) might have been more akin to "doing the right thing."  Instead, I found them all to willing to prostitute themselves by serving that most common demon of greed for money and the intoxication of winning.
        Tony had cancelled our regular meeting that had followed his strange and totally unexpected letter and I was actually very thankful for that timely cancellation in that I would have probably had entirely too many unkind things to say in the heat of the moment.  That cancellation gave me some valued space to seriously rethink about where I was with Tony Romo and this apparently dramatic display of attitude that I had encountered without any due warning.  I have always and sometimes to my own detriment given the benefit of the doubt to almost everyone I encounter.  Even more importantly, this missed engagement with Tony gave me added time to justly reevaluate the whole situation and determine any new direction that I might have needed to take just to survive the present situation.  The first thing I actually had to deal with was the ominous depression and suicidal ideation that had immediately flooded my total being.  Fortunately I had this incredible safety net of faithful friends that I could turn to in instances of extreme emotional turmoil.  I nearly always immediately called Bob McKinnon in Phoenix because he was the most reliable person to be available to me at any given time.  He had a Mobil phone that was with him at all times and his caring attitude for me personally went back many, many years and had never once faltered nor had he ever betrayed my sacred trust in his brotherly love for me.  The rest of that traumatic week, including the stressful weekend, had been requisitely devoted to sheer recovery and survival following the reception of that letter.
        The highlight of that tenuous recovery was needfully lit with another lifesaving call from Mark Werther.  He had called later Saturday morning and we talked for almost an hour during which time he later reported that he had gotten "madder and madder."  He too had suggested that I not mail the above letter but instead talk with Tone face to face and explain to him exactly how I felt.  A couple of hours had passed and Mark called back to explain that he had discussed with his wife Marsha the unforeseen situation and unexpected change of heart involving Tony Romo.  And that it had finally occurred to him that I had actually endured all of this unwanted shit at the hands of the American Orchid Society because they had so maliciously destroyed my profound "dignity that had been based on a lifetime of benevolence."  He had realized that this lawsuit was nothing about the more common attempt to just make a little fast cash by beating up some unsuspecting victim, and that I had indeed, been un-expectantly and brutally victimized.  Most importantly he came to the realization that he and I had become true friends and that his current concerns and involvement in the case had become a matter of loyalty and caring for my personal well-being.  This second call came at a crucial time when I was most questioning and pondering the actual causes of the lost loyalties of so many other individuals that had once considered themselves amongst my very best of friends.  Why then had I experienced the overwhelming betrayal and total abandonment of others when I had needed them the most?  I had pictured a devastated and bleak battlefield totally strewn with dead bodies and a pitiful few remaining barely alive, and my view was from the ground where I had, myself lay mortally wounded.  This was just another bleak reminder of my experienced inner turmoil that could have only foreseen a welcomed death and too little hope of ever having a meaningful life beyond that point.
        I had just executed my Last Will and Testament a week prior to this fateful letter and all I needed to have done in order to complete any unfinished business was to wrap up the last book.  I actually finished it that weekend and started this present volume just in case I lived through one more of these traumatic events that kept relentlessly pushing me to the very edge of life.
        The next Monday morning I had had a Metropolitan Court date for the expressed purpose of an eviction procedure for a tenant that had failed to pay rent for two months as well as consistently being late.  I also had two other tenants of only eight total units that were likewise delinquent.  I had sort of placed myself in this rather dire situation due to my own good efforts of not engaging in any form of discrimination against people of color.  I gave all three of these people–of-color tenants the benefit of any doubt and tried to work with their own stated/related personal problems.  All three of them repeated lied and made up some of the most creative excuses of exactly why they had been unable to meet their financial obligations in a timely fashion.  This was particularly difficult for me to deal with in light of the fact that I had unselfishly engaged myself in this monumental battle specifically on behalf of those oppressed that were likely unable to openly defend themselves.  Of some noted interest, the judge in this eviction proceeding was the wife of the Defense lawyer, Ned Shepherd that was representing Jean Schroder of Salt Lake City.
        On the Tuesday morning I had had another scheduled session with the psychologist that had been engaged by the Defense to evaluate me.  We had once again started the session on a confrontational note due to my strong objections to his emphatic employment of the Rorschach Inkblot Test.  This test is so totally objective that the person administering the test is afforded the wantonness luxury of finding almost anything they might be biasedly seeking.  That seriously concerned me since this man was being generously paid to support some undisclosed position of the Defense.  It is nothing but another obvious case of legal prostitution and too few individuals have the actual ability to remain objective when they are compensated at the rate of some two hundred dollars an hour to confirm whatever they are paid to objectively corroborate.  If this psychologist was actually ethical and truly objective, I doubt that local lawyers would have so repeatedly employed his services.  This Dr. Sam Roll had a "good" reputation amongst lawyers and from my own encounter with him; I believe that I fully understood why.
       I had emphatically suggested that he engage some other more reliable and objective instrument than the Rorschach and his defensively caustic and noted authoritative reply was that the Rorschach was the standard in forensic psychology and that I could choose not to continue the examination if I so desired.  What a dilemma!  Of course, my ending of the session at that point would have probably pleased the Defense since it would have sort of confirmed that I was a difficult and obstinate individual.  I had been placed in a most awkward position that I was certainly damned if I did and equally damned if I didn't.  Beware of the sinister traps laid by those, whose job is to keep the best of us oppressed and unable to effectively bring about any just change.  The Defense and their dastardly clients' only other alternative was to kill all the Freedom Seekers, myself included.  I would have no doubt been crucified by then if all of that had taken place some two millenniums ago.  It seemed that I had correctly predicted that the only way for the Defense to have successfully defended their clients was to have totally devastated the Plaintiff and further defile his good reputation.  All the Defense had done thus far was to continue the wrongful defamation and the infliction of relentless pain and suffering.  I found this system of justice rather sinister and chock-full of good reasons to throw in the towel and end the relentless agony.  This session with Dr. Roll had only added to the impact of the letter from Tony Romo.  I felt terribly betrayed by the entire system and the letter raised the eminent possibility of having been ultimately betrayed by even my own trusted council.
       Thursday rolled around and I was still wondering whether I had wanted to confront Tony with the letter in person.  I decided after lunch that I would take my two copies of the letter to Bob Foster's home and let him make the delivery for me.  I arrived at Bob's house at about 3:30 and put the letters into his hands with the comment that Tony's letter of March one was more than disturbing for me.  Bob responded that he had had the perceived idea that it was going to have made some sort of negative impact.  I didn't give any opportunity for Bob to add anything beyond my emphatic statement that "I really don't care if they decide not to continue with the case.  I really don't want to have to experience this kind of shit from my own council!"
       When I arrived home I told John that I didn't want to speak with Tony that evening and I didn't want to receive any other faxes.  I had wanted Tony to have a little time to seriously consider just what I felt to have been an unwarranted and damaging attack on his own client.  It was later that night that Tony arrived at the house with the proposed Amended Pleadings and a cover letter indicating that he and I would address the substance of my letter to him in the near future.  He had requested that I reply with my approval of these amended pleadings along with any suggestions that I might have had to anything that might have been missed.  I faxed my approval the very next day.
        I didn't have anytime to dwell on the matter of my failing relationship with Tony on that Friday.  Mark Werther had un-expectantly awakened me at 7:30 in the morning with the expressed purpose of finalizing the San Damiano business plan needed for his expert witness report that was due the very next Monday.  We spent almost seven hours working out the minute details so that the report could be easily defended.  The actual figures that were finally mutually arrived at were significantly below realistic possibilities and at the same time were more that substantive for the purposes of establishing damages in the lawsuit.  The same business plan and its accompanying figures were equally needed by another expert witness for the Plaintiff, Steve Riley to establish the damages as a result of my loss of enjoyment of life. 

BUSINESS PLAN
For
SAN DAMIANO ORCHIDS

            San Damiano Orchids proposed to sell original hybrids and clones made from the awarded plants bearing the 'San Damiano' clone name (see attached), but not necessarily limited to these plants and the resale of certain quality plants from other hybridizers.  The principle means of sales is intended to be mail order and through the Internet with other supplemental sales locally and as a vender at regional orchid shows.

            San Damiano would have begun sales from two greenhouses; a warm house with 1100 square feet of growing area and an intermediate house with 1070 square feet of available growing area.  (1070 + 1100 = 2170 less 15% circulation = 1844.5 X 2 levels = 3,689 less 25% breeding stock = 2,766.75 x average of 9  4" pots = 24,900 plant capacity)  Both of these greenhouses are double glazed, ¾" triple walled Lexan®.  Both are individually heated and equipped with a high-pressure fogging system employing de-ionized water.  As the business would expand, additional greenhouses would be constructed in the same manner and located at the same 4.6-acre sight in Cedar Crest, New Mexico.  Additional non-residence structures are permitted under the covenants of Sierra Vista South Subdivision.  There is also a room dedicated to flasking and light culture of mother and replated flasks of some 440 square feet. (440 sf less 15% circulation = 374 X Four levels = 1,496 usable sf X 4 flasks/sf = TOTAL potential flasks  5,984)

            The majority of sales would be seedlings and near blooming sized plants produced from mostly, but not limited to, San Damiano's own AOS awarded breeding stock with an estimated number of hybrids being no less than 75 new crosses per year.  (See attached: crosses made between 12/29/98 and 3/24/99= three months and 116 different crosses)  Yield could be anywhere from 200 to 500 seedling plants per cross, selling for somewhere between (depending on size and parentage) $ 7.00 to $ 15.00 each in their immature sizes and mature plants selling upwards to $ 35.00 depending of the quality of parentage.  I would estimate that resells would not exceed more that 20% of the estimated business.  It is estimated that the above (based on only 40 successful of a possible 75 new crosses per year) has the potential net income between $ 70,000.00 and $ 75,000.00 after an estimate of 40% to 50% total in expenses, materials and operating costs being deducted.

            The above was just the cover portion to the actual figures that had been employed to justify this summary.  Unfortunately the legal system's standard measure of justice is in terms of money.  The most interesting aspect of this above exercise was the blatant realization of just how much damage had been unknowingly inflicted on the part of the American Orchid Society.  I shared all of this with Diann and expressed that I hope this situation can be rightfully resolved.  With the lawsuit out of the way, just maybe we might have been able to get back on tract and to realize some of our abandoned dreams about having an orchid business designed and sufficient enough to justly support the rest of my life.

            The Defense was preparing their own contrived recant to any efforts on our parts and had apparently prostituted another “expert witness” into denouncing any claims that I might present.  I don’t suggest that you necessarily read the entire report; I am including it just to illustrate the extreme extent to which a Defense goes in order to discredit the Plaintiff.  Most of this report seems rather factual on its face, but the truth of the matter is that it is too often “comparing apples with oranges.”  I’m miffed that they weren’t able to produce an exclusively orchid culture expert to defend their position:

 REVIEW OF: (1) Business Plan for San Damiano Orchids, and (2) Written Report submitted by Mark Werther, Sentinel Orchids

Having examined the business plan for San Damiano Orchids and the analysis written by Mr. Werther, my comments are as follows:

Part one: Dr. Walkers Business Plan

Nowhere in Mr. Werther’s business analysis of San Damiano Orchids does he indicate any loss of income or opportunity due to Dr. Walker’s status as “not a judge.” It is obvious that Mr. Werther does not find the connection between being a judge or not being a judge material to the projections. I discovered some interesting facts which further substantiate this common sense conclusion.

The American Orchid Society maintains a database of commercial orchid growers. The database lists 286 commercial growers, 59 of which are A.O.S. judges. In other words, only twenty percent of the listed companies are owned or operated by judges. Of the five largest commercial orchid growers in America, none are A.O.S. judges, which further proves that being a judge is completely irrelevant in the business of selling orchids. Dr. Walker’s own expert (Mr. Werther) clearly states that his company (Sentinel Orchids) “evaluates vendors on performance, quality of plant material and price.” This is a completely reasonable if not obvious statement of how anyone would evaluate a vendor.

To further test my conclusion that not being a judge has no value for selling orchids, I carefully went through the July 1999 issue of the American Orchid Society Magazine. In forty-nine pages of pages of advertising, there is no mention by any vendor of their status as a judge.

Dr. Walker states in the first paragraph of his business plant that he intends to sell through mail order and the internet. There is no indication that one’s status as a judge or not a judge has any relevance to success or failure in either of these venues. Dr. Walker further states that his principal sales will be done through the internet and mail order. The fact that he would represent a catalog source and a price list to a very broad audience eliminates the effect of any potential or imagined lpç~,i prejudice. It is highly doubtful that an individual buyer in California or Florida would know of any controversy surrounding Dr. Walker.

Again in the first paragraph of the business plan for San Damiano Orchids, Dr. Walker states that sales will also take place at local and regional orchid shows. Later in his plan, he states that he will participate as a vendor in two local and eight regional shows. The attendance at these shows is the general public, a small percentage of which may be AOS members. I have personally attended dozens of these shows and have never seen a vendor promote sales by stating they are an orchid judge. There is simply no value in doing so~ Therefore, there would be no negative effect on sales of San Damiano orchids as a result of Dr. Walker not being a judge.

The second paragraph of Dr. Walker’s business plan indicates an amateur’s approach to plant culture. Growing on two levels in one greenhouse does not occur in any high quality production facility in the world. The direct consequence of growing on two levels is that plants growing on the second level are subjected to an extreme shortage of available light. The two most fundamental elements for the successful growing of plants are the quality of light and the quality of water. Diminish either of these essential inputs and you will devastate the quality of the plants produced.1

1 See BALL RED BOOK 16th edition page 149. “Plants produced under insufficient light levels grow slowly and have reduced vigor, stretched narrow stems, poor branching, and small leaves”. This section on Benefits of Supplemental Light by C. Anne Whealy, Ph.D.

According to reasonable and normal professional horticultural practices, San Damiano Orchids has a 2,170 square foot capacity, less 20% for circulation and work area, or a total of 1,736 square feet for growing plants. In calculating this figure, I am giving San Damiano credit for space efficiency I do not know exists. In greenhouse production one typically loses 25% to 30% to aisles, work areas and shipping areas. Extremely sophisticated operations with removable rolling tables can achieve 85% to 90% space utilization. According to Dr. Walker’s business plan, his breeding stock will take up 922.25 square feet. This would leave 814 square feet for production.

According to his business plan, he will produce and sell from this space $149,250 worth of orchids. This would give him an astonishing $183.35 per square foot of sales. Attached is a copy of the Nursery Business Analysis, performed by Man Hodges at the University of Florida. Table 8 compares my company data to other nurseries in Florida. You will note that the University of Florida economic analyst considers production efficiency of $12.47 per square foot very high. Dr. Walker claims to be able to produce at a rate of 14.7 times this very high rating.

An analysis of Dr. Walker’s annual expenses is problematic. There is no substantiation for any of the expenses. With respect to the flasking part of the business, according to paragraph two of Dr. Walker’s business plan, he will produce and maintain 5,984 flasks of his hybrids. Assuming 10% of the flasks are mother flasks for replating (the process of separating germinated seedlings and moving them to final flasks), Dr. Walker is left with 5,386 flasks of plants to grow out.

The standard number of plants per flask varies from 25 to 40 plants. Assuming, on the low side of the average, 30 plants per flask, Dr. Walker intends to produce 161,580 young plants. Dr. Walker does not indicate anywhere in his plan an intention to sell flasks.  According to Dr. Walker’s plan, he intends to sell in the fourth year a total of 7,290 plants. The question becomes, what does Dr. Walker do with the extra 140,000 to

150,000 plants that even he does not claim he will grow in his greenhouse? Will he throw them away?  Why produce them?

Dr. Walker indicates lab expenses will be $13,100 per year.  I assume this is for the consumables involved in the flashing process. This appears to mean that very expensive equipment (laminar flow hood, sterilization autoclave) already exists. This is consistent with the rest of the expense charts, as the greenhouses appear to be free, also. There is no cost of capital, and no depreciation.

Let’s look at what Dr. Walker intends to do. I will generously forget the preparation time in the process of making flasks ready for use, which would include: sterilizing flasks prior to filling with media or creating the media from prepackaged mix; filling the flasks with media under sterile condition; and sealing and storing them until use. Looking only at the replating process (going from the mother flask to the final flask), and assuming that Dr. Walker is a nimble and focused worker and will generate 30 flasks per day, using his planned production of 5,984 flasks, this process will occupy 200 workdays a year. All this effort is for plants for which he has no planned or stated use.

In paragraph three, we are shown the detail of the business plan. Dr. Walker will make orchid hybrids, and then sell plants at an overall net margin of 50% to 60%. This is the sum and substance of the plan. Dr. Walker states that the “yield could be anywhere from 200 to 500 seedling plants” from a single cross.  The correct number is more like 0 to 40,000 viable seed. Dr. Walker’s expert correctly points this out in his report, stating, “a viable seed pod can produce thousands of seedlings”. Mr. Werther further states “there are also circumstances where only 20-50 seedlings are produced from a viable seed pod” (emphasis added). What is unsaid but true is that a seedpod that is not viable produces no seeds and therefore no seedlings.

Following Dr. Walker’s projections, there will be 40 successful crosses. These will yield 14,000 seedlings. This result from 40 X 350 (in the middle of Dr. Walker’s 200 to 500 production number) would require the production of 467 flasks at thirty plants per flasks. Dr. Walker does not indicate where he will get the seeds for the 5,517 other flasks he intends to produce? At this point, one might say that Dr. Walker only said there was a potential for 5,984 flasks, so we should just do the math ourselves and understand that he will only make the flasks he needs. However, the lab cost on an annual basis is consistent with the production 6,000 flasks, not 400.

On the expense chart for San Damiano Orchids, it appears that only anticipated expenses in the third, fourth and fifth years are shown. The numbers on the chart of expenses match the expense lines on the pages marked third year, fourth year and fifth year. This is the first time I have ever seen sales increase by 40 percent without incurring even $0.05 incremental additional expense. Dr. Walker ‘s business plan shows an expense line for the first year of $52,000, and a second year expense line of $54,650, but no details are given. It is unclear which expenses Dr. Walker will or will not incur during the first and second years. I cannot find the $24,000 difference in static overhead between year one and year three.

Nowhere in any of the expenses is there provision for paid labor. This seems to imply that Dr. Walker intends to personally carry out every function in the nursery. Apparently, he will make all of the hybrids, harvest the seeds, sow the mother flasks, replate the seedlings to final flask, deflask the seedlings, pot them to individual pots or community pots, grow and nurture the plants to a saleable stage, and market them through the various channels described in his plan. Based on the projection that Dr. Walker will spend 200 days in the lab and thirty days away at shows, he will have 30 days a year to accomplish all of the non-lab and on-the-road show sales. This assumes 5 days times 52 weeks a year, for a total of 260 days. Based on this assumption, it does not seem reasonable that Dr. Walker can carry out all of the work involved by himself, but, as previously stated, nowhere in the expense chart is there a provision for labor expense. Even assuming the first and second years pass without any help, it is impossible to believe Dr. Walker will be able to operate at the projected high level of sales without any outside help.

I am at a loss to comment on the expenses of the greenhouse against the anticipated production. Dr. Walker never states what he plans to grow, only what he plans to sell. These will be two different numbers, as you will never sell all that you grow and you will lose some plants along the way. in other words, some plants will die. Dr. Walker makes no projection of these numbers in his business plan.

My conclusion is that Dr. Walker has not presented a cohesive business plan. He has placed words and numbers on sheets of paper that do not make sense. Nowhere does Dr. Walker attempt to establish that a market exists for the plants he intends to sell in the numbers he intends to sell them. The issue is not whether or not Dr. Walker is an AOS judge, but rather whether Dr. Walker is an effective and competent business person. He has not demonstrated competence in the business plan presented!

Part Two: Mr. Werther —Sentinel Orchids

In his third paragraph of comments on “paragraph 1” of the San Damiano business plan, Mr. Werther’s report indicates, “It is usual practice for commercial growers to take advantage of acquiring high quality plants from other growers and wholesalers for the purpose of growing the plants on to larger size for resale.” Apparently, Mr. Werther is referring to Dr. Walker’s purchase of plants for growing on. At first reading, I thought that Mr. Werther was discussing a sales avenue for Dr. Walker.

Mr. Werther’s next paragraph states that use of the internet sales channel and mail order is essential to reaching Dr. Walker’s target market.  We have already established that there is no value in being a judge in this line of sales, and Mr. Werther never contradicts this. Mr. Werther states, “it would not be unusual to reach 1000 accessing growers per month using this medium”. He gives no information regarding what one could reasonably expect sales to be as a result of 1000 orchid grower visits to the site. Since Mr. Werther’s report gives no indication of potential sales from the internet, I am using the only information available to me. Garden.com is the leading internet provider of plants (including orchids). Garden.com receives an average of 53,000 visits per day, or 1.6 million per month. Their 1999 sales were five million dollars, for an average over four hundred thousand dollars per month. That would be three cents per visitor in sales. Using ten times that number for Dr. Walker, and assuming he will get $.30 cents of sales per visitor to the orchid mall and related sites, that would mean gross sales of $300 per month, or $3,600 per year. From data provided, it appears that Dr. Walker intends to spend $5,500 per year starting in the third year on internet and advertising. In his third paragraph, Mr. Werther tells us the internet was irrelevant prior to 1996, according to his “source” at Antec Orchids (?). In Paragraph 4, Mr. Werther gives numbers. Dr. Walker’s sales at orchid shows will provide gross sales of “between $1200 and $6000.” The calculated average is $3600. Dr. Walker intends to sell at ten shows per year, giving gross sales of $36,000 from show sales per year. We are now up to $39,600 in sales per year, assuming Dr. Walker has orchids people want to buy. Please note that Mr. Werther has not indicated any number for internet sales, but has given guidance in his expert capacity that Dr. Walker can expect $36,000 in sales from the shows. According to Dr. Walker’s expense projection, he will have $16,650 in various expenses associated with selling at shows. Even with the huge margins Dr. Walker anticipates in his financial projections of selling at double his cost, Dr. Walker will enjoy only a $1,500 profit from his show selling activities. Gross sales ($36,000), less show expenses ($16,500), less fifty percent cost of goods ($18,000) equals a net profit of $1,500 for the year’s effort. All of the other projected revenue must then be coming from mail order. The mail order business is a very labor intensive activity, as it requires the handling of a great many small individual orders, one at a time.

In his comments regarding Paragraph 2 of Dr. Walker’s business plan, Mr. Werther correctly concludes that Dr. Walker must deduct 210 square feet if he does not have moving benches. Mr. Werther agrees with Dr. Walker that he can grow on more than one level. This is absolutely contrary to good horticultural practice and is a clear indicator that Mr. Werther is also an amateur grower. Mr. Werther calculates the number of plants Dr. Walker may grow if they are all in 3 1/2” pots. Dr. Walker will certainly not grow everything in 3 ½” pots. Mr. Werther further reflects that space for the under 6000 flasks is possible. Mr. Werther never calculates that Dr. Walker would consequently have 150,000 unnecessary plants in flask in his possession. On the potted plant section, Mr. Werther tells us 2766 X 9 = 24,900. This calculation is meaningless in the context of Dr. Walker’s business plan, since he states he will sell 4,500 3 1/2 “pots per year. In Mr. Werther’s Professional and Horticultural Information sheet, we learn that he has 1,200 square feet of green house space. We net that down to 960 square feet of available growing space. Mr. Werther also states that he has over 4000 plants. 1 must assume it would be close to the 4,000 number. That would be about 4 plants per square foot. This is less than half the density Mr. Werther allows Dr. Walker. Dr. Walker never gives us planting or growing cycle times in his business plan. Mr. Werther seems to believe that growing plants pot to pot “tight fitted” throughout the plant’s life cycle is a reasonable horticultural practice. This is further evidence of Mr. Werther’s amateur approach to ornamental production.

Regarding Mr. Werther’s reflections on Dr. Walker’s Paragraph Three, I agree that Dr. Walker can make 75 crosses per year and that 40 of them are likely to be viable. Orchid hybridizing is an extremely simple activity and takes very little time and effort to accomplish. Mr. Werther goes on to advise Dr. Walker that he could get a lot more seeds from his crossing than he is now anticipating. Next, Mr. Werther suggests it would be a good idea for Dr. Walker to mericlone his good plants. Indeed it would be a good idea, but Dr. Walker does not mention it in his business plan. Why does Mr. Werther mention this, unless to point out to us that Dr. Walker does not include it in his business plan.

Annual expenses

Mr. Werther’s statement that he has “reviewed the line items expenses under expenses and finds them reasonable” is indefensible. I pointed out earlier that there is no expense for the capital cost of the greenhouses or the lab equipment, and no depreciation. There is no production plan or schedule. The expenses would be related to such a plan. It is quite impossible to give an opinion of the expenses in the absence of this information.

Mr. Werther’s conclusions on damages

Mr. Werther’s last section on page four deals with his opinion as to the income loss relating to “negative information.” We are never told what that negative information is. The only negative information that would affect the success of San Damiano Orchids is a reputation for poor quality plants, failure to deliver as promised, or above market pricing.

The very first thing Mr. Werther tells us is that he “evaluates vendors on performance, quality of plant material and price.” That is how the market works. He goes on to say, “there are some buyers who may shun doing business with what they consider an anti­-AOS entity.  Mr. Werther never states that Dr. Walker might have a problem selling all of his plants.  He states that, if the plants are good and the price is right, he (Mr. Werther) could be a customer, and that some (an unquantified statement) may not buy plants from Dr. Walker. As a commercial grower, my company has hundreds of customers. We are restricted to a far smaller potential market base because we sell wholesale only. While we have hundreds of customers, there are thousands of potential customers that do not buy from us. The question is, will Dr. Walker have enough customers sell the plants he wants to sell. The determination of that will be what Mr. Werther described as “performance, quality of plant material and price”.

Conclusion

Neither Dr. Walker’s business plan nor Mr. Werther’s report on same include enough numbers. What numbers there are do not work. In my opinion, the business plan does not meet even minimum standards and requirements for a successful professional horticultural operation.

I have written this report based on the information provided. If further information becomes available, it may materially affect my opinions and conclusions.

Respectfully submitted,
    Kerry L Herndon
Kerry L. Herndon
Kerry’s Bromeliad Nursery, Inc.

            I had a call on Friday from Dennis Davies-Wilson and he had suggested that we might get together that weekend to start our joint project of writing a book, An Interview with Jesus in the Hot Tub.  I shared the total despair that I had experienced the previous weeks and that I wouldn't be a good time to be creative.  We did, however, decide that his being here with me would be a good idea.  I felt I really needed to have something a little more positive in my life and we agreed to take advantage of a performance of Mahler's Ninth Symphony was being performed at Popejoy Hall that very Saturday evening.  We did the concert and followed it with a very nice dinner.  It was just what the doctor might have ordered and Dennis' company was most appropriate considering his long time friendship and his particular involvement with my distressful and anguishing ordeal with the American Orchid Society.
            After Dennis left on Sunday morning I almost intuitively returned to my original state of deep depression and being so totally frustrated, I decided to write another letter in order to get some of my languishing thoughts put down on paper.  It seems that the only therapy readily available to me at any given time was the verbal expression of my inner thoughts.  This time it was addressed to Judge Black.  I wanted to express my total frustration with the legal system and the matter in which this system seemingly imposes such definitive restrictions on justice because of its inherent oppressive nature.  I wasn't sure if the letter would have ever been sent, but just in case I had decided to end my life, I wanted at least someone who might come across the document to know what I had encountered within the legal world.  It had become particularly disheartening that in many instances the betrayal of the system of justice was even more discouraging than much of the treachery that I had endured within the American Orchid Society.

March 13, 2000

The Honorable Judge Black
Federal Court Building
Albuquerque, New Mexico 87102
 

Re:  J. Lamah v. Aldrich, et al.
        U.S. District Court No. CIV 98-1403 BB/WWD

Dear  Judge Black:

I have become so terribly desperate of late and so totally frustrated with the entire dimension of this lawsuit that I felt I needed to put down all the current causes, reasons and situations that are hounding my most inner being and causing me to consider leaving this horrid world that I live in.  I feel like I am reaching that final point of self-destruction that I had so prophetically alluded to in the opening of my first book.  "This literary piece could no doubt qualify for the Guinness Book of Records as the longest suicide note ever written.  Providing, of course, that at its conclusion I have actually undertaken that final effort and ended this trying existence."  The other noteworthy delineations in both the first and second books are the words of dedication of the two volumes "To: The Oppressed Who Too Often Suffer In Quiet Desperation" and “To: The Enslaved Who Ominously Toil In Utter Hopelessness.”  I never had the idea that I may have been addressing those profound sentiments to myself as well.  I had the totally mistaken idea that perhaps an educated white male mainstream American citizen might have successfully insisted on fair treatment within this archaic justice system despite his un-chosen gay life-style.  No way!  Justice still seems to be preserved only for those who operate within those biasedly established rules of law—written and unwritten--notably by those in positions of power and all too willingly subscribed to despite their dire consequences on some individuals.
          The most notable violation of my inalienable rights is the suppression of speech.  May I remind you that our First Amendment Rights to free expression was not written just to permit pornography, but every citizen's unassailable right to protest the actions of government WITHOUT the threat of reprisal.  Ms. Shannon, the council for the Defense, seems to object to my execution of that right.  She has tried to indict my good character based on my implying that the actions of Magistrate Judge Deaton are bigoted.  She failed to have given the totality of his reprehensible behavior during our Scheduling Hearing.  He had enthusiastically introduced the idea that he was willing to take on the proceedings of the entire case himself.  The three other lawyers that were present briefly discussed this and they (not we!) decided that this was an acceptable proposition.  By that time, I had already taken exception to the rather negative demeanor of the Judge and had the distinct impression that he was of that school of thought that possibly didn't approve of either my life-style or the fact that I was a Pro Se litigant.  In either case, an unbiased judge should show impartiality to the two opposing sides of a case.  I, having my own right to object, did so.  That would have been fine, but in obvious retaliation to the free exercise of my right, the Judge later on addressing another issue in the case, emphatically and doggedly told me in an effort to deny my rightful input, "I'LL DO THE TALKING, AND YOU DO THE LISTENING!"  I found his rather condescending demeanor and tone of voice very objectionable and particularly since he had continued to permit the other lawyers present to freely speak their own piece.  I felt just like that proverbial "Nigger" of some fifty years ago that had no say or vote in this supposedly free society.  Of course, sometimes we gays aren’t treated with any more respect as evidenced by the need for “hate crime” legislation.  It was that ominous feeling of oppression and knowing I had no power in that situation that I had refrained from saying anything further.  (that “quite desperation”)  I did rightfully express myself on this situation in the second book and certainly on my own web site because I know that the citizens of this free country should know the truth of the matter.  These hidden-from-the-public displays of contemptible behavior on the parts of those who occupy the benches of our judicial system should be fully exposed for their irreprehensible contribution to the continuing injustice perpetrated on so many disenfranchised citizens.
          Ms. Shannon, on our first encounter that was by telephone, was very typically condescending in her tone of voice and doggedly suggested that she was going to win this lawsuit in the same manner that she had previously prevailed with so many other poor Pro Se litigants.  She immediately suggested that some of the reasons for her infrequent lack of any success that was of no fault attributed to her, was that she may have been simply misinformed by her own clients.  Giving her the benefit of the doubt,  I have no objection to a good fight, but her non-professional approach and tactics became even more apparent as we proceeded.  Her first gross non-professional act was lying in court to your more-than-once-repeated question of "Who has the final say in this man's elevation?"  Her final retort was essentially: "The Committee, but they are not part of the American Orchid Society, they only use their name!"  Even people unfamiliar with the structure of the American Orchid Society found her retort pathetically desperate and certainly a gross misrepresentation of the actual facts (A lie!).  She later added insult by suggesting to you that the Court should not afford me any concessions because of my Pro Se status because I had sought the council of other lawyers (as research consultants), and that I should be held to the higher standards required of lawyers.  This wasn't at all objectionable to me except that she implied that I should be held to her standards, which she had already demonstrated to me that were anything but ethical.  Roy Black is a close friend and was my littler ATΩ fraternity brother and we have specifically discussed the "the right of every citizen to the very best defense available," but we also agreed that the defense should not violate any ethics or rules of law in providing that defense, despite the fees (prostitution) paid!
          It was later that in another telephone conversation with Ms. Parden that I suggested that we get together and discuss the possibility of settling the case.  I might add that this requested process is part of the instructions of your Court as preparation for the scheduled Settlement Hearing.  Ms. Parden refused to meet with me and bases her refusal on what she considered as the fact that there is no merit to my case.  She had already attempted to indict me with the label of being unwilling to settle the matter without the Court and it appeared that she was only attempting to once again cast an unfavorable light on me.  I guess that's her job?  She would have no doubt in my mind latter told the Magistrate Judge that it was I who had avoided pre-hearing attempts at settlement.  When anyone acts in direct defiance of the rules and performs in a dastardly manner essentially for monetary gains, I descriptively call that misconduct prostitution.  Those who maintain the employment of such individuals are often referred to as pimps.  In my book I had referred to her employing councilors as "legal pimps."  As a literary expression, I don't particularly see anything defamatory by the commonly employed use of these rather common terms.  I don’t see lawyers as being beyond reproach or above the law, even if they are to offer “the very best defense to their clients” that money can buy.
          To further explain my disbelieving position that Ms. Parden often acts in an unacceptable and possibly non-professional manner, I was appalled at her questionable behavior involving one of my witnesses.  When I arrived home on the night of February 9, 2000, there was a desperately sounding message on my answering machine from Bill Heath who had earlier that day received a threatening call from Ms. Parden.  She was seeking a sworn statement from him that essentially would have him deny all that I had claimed that he had previously and freely reported to me.  See the attacked sworn statement that Bill Heath made that night.  He had been instructed to not call me and had it not been for his older partner's thoughtful persuasion, Bill would have never called.  The resultant sworn statement of Bill Heath initially written by the Defense is an extorted distortion of the truth and I do not fault Bill Heath for having acted under such inappropriate circumstances and duress.  What is even more disturbing is the ultimate response of my own council.  He had initially asked Bob Foster to research the law and find some precedence for filing a complaint against the Defense.  Apparently there was nothing substantial in the law and under his own perceived form of legalistic oppression, Mr. Romo didn't wish to prejudice the case with the Judge by filing an unprecedented complaint.  Now, of course, Ms. Shannon is using her ill-gotten sworn statement from Mr. Heath as part of her documentation for a summery judgement.  I have been instructed by Mr. Romo to not write any letters of protests and I understand his rightful concern that such letter writing in this current atmosphere of denial of free expression is too often used only to indict the writer.  If the Court is not made aware of these awkward and questionable situations, then these clear acts of misconduct are then construed as acceptable.  If they are, I am appalled at, but not at all surprised, at the gross miscarriage of justice.  No wonder there is so little respect for our legal system and the widespread questionable misconduct of lawyers.  I have the greatest respect for my own lawyer with the exception of his tolerance of such misconduct on the part of the Defense, though I fully understand his complacency. One of the very specific reasons for my having eventually filed this lawsuit as Pro Se, was my not being restricted by the ill-conceived professional courtesy of not indicting one's fellow lawyers for procedural misconduct that they themselves may wish to employ at some future date.  The other built-in scenario supporting the miscarriage of justice is the judicial oppression that is felt by lawyers who don't wish to protest some of the oppressive rules of law or any conduct that may be employed for the sake of justice before a Judge that they feel the Judge may possible find objectionable.  No matter how you slice up this system of justice, it remains totally oppressive and most notably to the victims who should benefit from “equal protection under the law.”
         
Mr. Romo suggested to me, only of late, that I should not now seek to "exhaust my administrative remedies" by contacting the EEOC BECAUSE it might have the wrong appearance to the Court.  In the course of exploring the American Disabilities Act's possible application in this case, it was rightfully noted by the Defense that I had not "exhausted my administrative remedies" within the 300 days as a Statute of Limitation.  For the specific allegations in the original filing that is appropriate.  BUT it was less than 300 days ago (June 19, 2000) that I had been officially "kicked out" as a student judge by the Great Plains Judging Center for reasons definitely related to this lawsuit.  I am under the impression that the EEOC has the only authority to suggest/decide whether this particular act violates the ADA.  I fully understand Mr. Romo's edict that I NOT SPEAK to anybody about this including the EEOC because it might have the wrong appearance.  I'm not sure what unwritten rule this all addresses, but I am at a loss as to what to do.  Everybody has pointed the finger at me for having originally gone beyond the 300 days, which nowhere had I been made aware of.  AND now that there is the possibility that the American Orchid Society has inadvertently provided me with another window of opportunity, I am specifically instructed to not take advantage of the situation, and so emphatically told so because it just may offend you and the Court.  What am I to do when my own legal council, playing within his perceived interpretation of proper conduct as viewed by the Court, seems to be failing to protect my own rights?  Tony had even suggested that I might bring an action against the original lawyers in the suit for not having advised me of those 300 days.  I found that suggestion rather hypocritical in light of his not having made me aware of this limitation when we first addressed my case and my own suggested involvement of the ADA.  This was particularly offensive since we had met at a seminar conducted by him on the legal aspects and applications of the ADA as they affected people living with HIV/AIDS.  Even the “expert” wasn’t initially aware of this limitation until the Defense pointed it out.  Isn’t this a serious breach of responsibility to the client to protect his best interest?
            I have just written in the first chapter of my third book on this whole matter, Betrayal and Oppression: Humpty-Dumpty Must He Die?, "And most importantly, I was confident that Tony, despite his own lifestyle and desire to have had a significant impact on the discrimination against gays and others, had, after all, been too skillfully trained in that revered establishment Georgetown law school.  He had most likely encountered an education that no doubt duly instructed him to march to an established and recognized drummer that was probably more attuned to the good old boy's status quo of still favoring and often unknowingly supported the legal oppression of any and all minorities."  I would have been overjoyed to have successfully broken with the traditional legalized oppression in some minute form with the fortuitous execution of this case.  It would have well served everyone, most notably yourself included, to have been part of the expansion of the "equality of all men (women included!)" to some of us who still sadly exists well outside of the ideal situation of "equal protection under the law" for all Americans.

            Maybe some day, some one else will succeed where I have failed?

Very Truly yours,

         J. Lamah          .
J. Lamah

            I never did send the above letter.  Composing it that Sunday helped me immensely to refocus and sort regain a grip on living, and most importantly, to do so in the spirit of a line from that Civil Rights' song; "Keep my eyes on the prize."  I had received a timely call from David Plumer that night.  And it was the second time someone had suggested that I might want seek the services of that infamous Jerry Spence, who wouldn't have so likely been as easily intimidated as I had perceived Tony possibly being.  In any case, David and I had agreed that before I might have possibly sent the above letter to Judge Black, I might ought to follow the sage advice of Joanne Bodin and visit Judge Black's courtroom and see just how well he deals with real justice.  What a tragic drama this whole legal situation had become and it wasn't about to end anytime soon.
            On Monday morning it was business as usual and I received another fax from Tony as though nothing had interfered with his predictably focused progress with the case.  He had faxed his proposed lists of questions that were going be part of the Plaintiff's interrogatories to the Defendants and asked me to review them and add any additional suggestions.  I had that morning's project essentially finished by noon.  As usual, Tony had done an excellent job as that consummate professional that he was when doing things his way.  I headed for town to deliver the hard copies and when I reached Tony's office he requested that I remain for a few minuets.  He was talking with Bob Foster by phone when I had entered and he switched the call over to the speaker so that we could all confer about the progress of the case.  After the call was completed Tony wanted to discuss the situation of my dismissal from the judging program at Great Plains in the context of the part that was played by Billie Beck Kramer.  Billie had once been considered my good friend as well as the last mentor that I had had in the judging program, and it was she who had so disrespectfully introduced that fateful motion to have me dismissed as a student judge.  She had told me the evening of the alleged betrayal that she had been so instructed to propose the motion by non other than Dr. Berneice Miller, the educational director.  In any case, I told Tony once again that this event had taken place only the previous June and that it was still less than 300 days since that action had occurred.  It seemed that Tony had finally made the connection that this was possibly an authentic window of added opportunity to finally take action and actually "exhaust my administrative remedies" by filing a complaint with the Albuquerque district office of the Equal Employment Opportunities Commission (EEOC).  Apparently there was still time left that would allow us to legitimize our ADA claims and do so in a timely fashion.  He was so taken with the realization that he immediately looked up the address of the EEOC and when I eventually left his office I immediately paid them a visit.  On this initial visit I only retrieved the intake form for our mutual review at our next scheduled meeting.
            If all the usual business wasn’t enough, This Monday was also the appointed time for me to meet with the sheriff at the apartments and actually evict the tenant from number eight.  The tenant wasn’t prepared to move and gave a rather harsh objection to the sheriff claiming, “I haven’t had enough time to get out!”  The sheriff in a rather authoritative tone suggested to the tenant that “By the time I have arrived on the scene you have been served a Three-Day Notice, a notice to appear in court some three or four days later, a court date that was set for about two weeks after that and then another seven days to actually vacate the property.  That all adds up to almost a month.  You can’t tell me that you haven’t had enough notice!”  I changed the locks and the sheriff posted a notice on the door that the apartment was “off limits” without the presence of the owner.  I also discovered that my tenant in number one had vacated without paying rent.  This means that there is another month that my cash flow just doesn’t meet my basic needs.
             John had headed for town on that same Monday to accomplish some needed business errands before he had to leave for Minnesota that Wednesday.  We had met for a late lunch and while we were still eating Tony called me several times on my
Mobil phone to confer with me about some added changes in the content of the proposed interrogatories.  By that evening I had received a final call from Tony indicating that the questions for the interrogatories to the Defendants were finally completed.
            Wednesday John had left for his house-decorating job in Minnesota at about 2:00 P.M. and I had to hang out in town the rest of the afternoon because I had a dinner engagement with Diann O'Neill at 4:45.  We were going to have this dinner immediately before a Corrales Zoning Commission meeting, were Diann was on the agenda seeking approval for a home business—her Doll Case as well as one for mail-order orchids.  She had wanted to be sure that she wasn't violating any local ordinances with having her mail-order orchid business being operated from her residence.  As it turned out, her more than troublesome next-door-neighbor woman was the wife of the Chairman of the Corrales Zoning Commission.  To make the long story short, this witch of a neighbor had successfully torpedoed Diann's proposal do doubt with the help of her political husband.  I guess it was dirty politics as usual.  It was all too obvious what was taking place in this meeting.  One of the more reasonably disposed and fare Commissioners had thoughtfully raised the question as whether Diann actually needed any approval on her orchid business since the existing A-1 zoning of her property had already allowed for agricultural use as well as the sale of agricultural products without any Township approval.
          As it turned out, Diann called the appropriate authorities the very next day and withdrew that agricultural portion of her application.  One of the specific issues that had initially caused this political blockage was the alleged noise produced by the greenhouse's exhaust fan.  The Commissioners were going have made an onsite visit to Diann's home and greenhouses to have personally inspected this noise for themselves, but since the initial application had been duly and timely withdrawn, there remained little need for their intended snooping.  So much for the parochial politics in semi-rural New Mexico!
          Thursday arrived much earlier than I had cared about since I really didn't want to have that face-off with Tony Romo.  In any case, I showed up to our meeting a little late due to my attempted but failed monthly appointment with Dr. Morrison.  We were to have met at 3:00, but due to an emergency situation with an intake patient, she was still tied up at 4:00.  I requested that we make the appointment the next week so that I wouldn't be any later than necessary for my appointed and limited time with Tony.  When I had arrived, Tony and Bob had already started with the business of the day dealing with an update on the proposed amendments to the filings and the fact that the interrogatories had been duly delivered to the Defense.  Tony then immediately zeroed in on the unpleasant controversy surrounding our exchanged letters.  I must admit that he handled the whole situation with highest degree of integrity and in a manner that was more than consistent with my very first impressions of his abilities.  He was appropriately apologetic and suggested a more than fair solution that actually addressed the deeper issues of the case.  So why did he write the letter in the first place, if only to arrive back at the beginning?
            First of all, we agreed to amend the agreement and change the percentages from the original thirty percent to thirty-three and a third.  Tony said that he had recognized from my letter the immense importance of San Damiano to my overall well-being.  He said that he had insightfully realized the meaningful connection between the name of the home and the clonal name of ‘San Damiano’ that appeared on all of the awards from the American Orchid Society and that he had a better realization just why there had been such a drastic reaction to his letter.  He said that there was no need to attach either the home or the apartments that were the sole source of any income.  Then he presented the most appropriate/creative proposal of all by suggesting that these books be entered as the fiscal collateral for insuring the payment of the expenses of the lawsuit.  I was so pleased with his suggestion on two accounts.  First of all, I had written the books to insure that this case would eventually be part of the public record and not with any high hopes of making a cash killing.  These books would have no collateral value without publication and their being held hostage would more likely insure a greater effort at having them eventually published.  Secondly, the books were specifically about this case and their specific involvement as part and partial of the factual basis of this lawsuit was a poetically and politically correct suggestion for solving these financial particulars.  I was so pleased with the way in which Tony had handled this whole situation.  We parted with a very hardy hug.
            Thursday evening John had called to inquire about my scheduled meeting with Tony that day and whether I had made any significant progress.  I informed him of the unexpected success of the meeting and confided that I felt much better under the revised circumstances.  Later that night my niece, Julie and her boyfriend showed up from Taos for a late night visit and planed sleepover.  That brief visit gave me a chance to fill Julie in on the latest developments and assure her that the Last Will and Testament that she had recently received turned out to have been only a bit of needed housekeeping and nothing for her to worry herself over.  Fortunately it wasn't some final testament to my then ever present and potentially imminent demise.
            On Friday I had received another fax from Tony, which included a copy of a letter to the Defense.  The cover portion asked that I begin preparing a time line of events revolving around Lee McAnena in preparation for her forthcoming deposition that was alluded to in this enclosed letter:

(Romo & Associates)
March 17, 2000

Re:      Lamah v. Kramer, et al.
U.S. District Court No. CIV 98-1403 BB/KM

Dear Counsel:

This is to confirm that as a result of telephone calls amongst counsel for the parties the following depositions are in the process of being noticed:
      Ms. Lee McAnena     April   5, 2000     1:30 p.m.      Madison Firm
      Ms. Jean Schroder    April 12, 2000     1:00 p.m.       Salt Lake City

Plaintiff also wishes to schedule the deposition of Mr. Norito Hasagawa on April 10, April 11 or April 12, 2000.  To my knowledge, Mr. Hasegawa is not represented by counsel in this cause of action.  Therefore, while Plaintiff will he noticing the deposition, my sense is that Ms. Parden may want her office to handle communications with Mr. Hasegawa. If not, I will be happy to contact Mr. Hasegawa to coordinate the scheduling of the deposition.  In any event, because Mr. Hasegawa is not a party and the inherent cost of the travel, I will procure a Subpoena Duces Tecum and get it served at the address listed in the American Orchid Society membership address book, Please advise me of your availability.

This letter also confirms that all counsel agree to postpone the depositions of individuals from the American Orchid Society, the Rocky Mountain Judging Region, the Great Plains Judging Region and Ms. Anita Aldrich until such time in the summer of 2000.  I will prepare a stipulated order to that effect for your consideration.

    Anthony Lawrence Romo

Anthony Lawrence Romo
For the Firm

Enclosures:   As Stated

cc:      Robert Foster, Esq.; Client (each by facsimile only)

Julie left late Friday morning and I had immediately left to collect another late rent from one of my tenants.  I actually got half of the rent by following him to his place of employment where I collected his endorsed paycheck.  The excuse for the short payment was that his employer didn't pay him for all of his reported hours and the person responsible for the shortage wasn't present to make any corrections.  I supposed it was just another of those creative excuses along with the promise that the balance would be paid the following Monday.  This added/unanticipated trip to the other end of town to insure at least this partial payment caused me to miss my last scheduled meeting with the psychologist.  I called Dr. Roll and we rescheduled for that ensuing Monday.
          When I arrived home there was another message on my answering machine from Tony reminding me that I now turn my full attention to writing a rather concise delineation of my past relationship with Pete and Lee McAnena in preparation for the scheduled Defense's deposition of Lee McAnena.  This whole situation surrounding this imminent deposition was just another dramatic reminder of the beguiling betrayal of a once good friend brought about in some contrived conjunction with the malicious misconduct of the American Orchid Society.  Even more revealing was the pitiful weakness of character of some of the people that I had once so graciously and openly permitted into my trusted confidence.  Tony had suggested in his call that I need not get this project done in any immediate mode as was usual for him.  He rather asked to take the weekend off and get some rest and be prepared to address the task sometime the next week.  I mostly followed his kind suggestion with the exception that I sort of created the format of the assignment by the naming of the second chapter and dedicating its contents to this singular assignment dealing with Lee McAnena.  I had even written the first few lines as a reminder of where I had intended to direct its attention.  I had also realized the importance of finally telling the whole story of San Damiano and knew that the third proposed chapter would be addressing that matter.
          This same Friday I had also received two other copies of letters from Romo to Council by fax and one in particular was interesting in that dealt with the disposition of potential witness for the Plaintiff.  I include only this one of two letters just to show all the “out of sight” activities of a lawsuit that keeps that money ticker running up the expenses of a typical legal procedure.  Of special note is the last paragraph where there is some postponements on deposing the AOS in particular and other witnesses that should play a rather significant role in this lawsuit:

                                                                               (Romo & Associates)
                                                                                               March 17, 2000

Re:      Lamah v. Kramer, et al.
U.S. District Court No. CIV 98-1403 BB/KM

Dear Counsel:

I made a mistake in my letter to you of March 15. 2000. My office inquired as to where the originals of the experts witness reports tendered to you on that date should he filed, In the process of reviewing the letter to answer the question. I noted the following.

           Plaintiff’s witnesses Dr. Koster, Dr. Morrison and Dr. Wilson
           heretofore designated as expert witnesses are now designated as
           fact witnesses for the Plaintiff.

The stated premise should have been restricted to Dr. Wilson, Dr. Koster and Dr. Morrison are each treating physicians to the Plaintiff. That being the case, pursuant to D.N.M.I.R-Civ. 26.3(b)   Dr. Koster and Dr. Morrison need not prepare an expert witness report as otherwise required of expert witnesses by Fed.R.Civ.P.26(a)(2)(B).   I have already told Ms. Parden that I have no objection to the deposition of Plaintiff’s experts by counsel for Defendants anytime before Labor Day, 2000.

As such, I hereby amend the sentence that is the subject of this letter to read as follows.  Plaintiff’s witness Dr. Wilson heretofore designated as an expert witness is now designated as a fact witness for the Plaintiff.

Looks like I’d be well advised to work in a little rest this weekend.

     Anthony Lawrence Romo

Anthony Lawrence Romo
For the Firm

Enclosures:   As Stated

cc:      Robert Foster, Esq.; Client (each by facsimile only)

Monday was my appointed time to finally replace the windshield in my van since the one seriously stone-inflicted blemish had finally developed a noticeable crack that had then crossed nearly the entire windshield.  After that timely installation I had had another appointment with the psychologist, Dr. Sam Roll.  That turned out to be a most interesting encounter in which he had wanted me to relate the story behind the lawsuit.  It was during this session that Dr. Roll realized just how extensive the involvement was and some of his body language and non-verbal responses clearly indicated that he had possibly gotten the deeper message of just how totally damaging this whole experience had been for me.  He was particularly taken with my report of what I had addressed to the Trustees in Baltimore emphatically suggesting the lack of a realistic need for the American Orchid Society if they were only to have grown orchids indigenous to the homelands from where we blue-eyed, blond people had originated.  His revealing and sympathetic response disclosed that he was originally from Columbia and was more than intimately aware that the vast majority of cultivated orchids came from some other part of the world where the people perhaps had a little more pigment in their skin and certainly darker eyes.  For someone that I had originally had my serious suspicions about, the session left me feeling much better about this Colombian who was seemingly aware that my specialty in orchid culture, Odontoglossums came from his native land?  He was even familiar with the very name, Odontoglossum.  An added bonus to his overtly observable appreciation of my situation was my having tactfully mentioned that the American Orchid Society had even had a history of anti-Semitic sentiments as well.  I had later learned that Dr. Sam Roll was Jewish and it still remained the reality that this paid professional was to receive his fees for a report that would support the position of the Defense.  Our session was limited to the usual hour and though the both of us had originally thought that this session was going to be our last, my story turned out to being too long to have finished in just one intended last session.  Dr. Roll suggested that we have at least one more hour together so that I could finish the story.
          I was most pleased with that Monday consultation session with Dr. Roll and enthusiastically reported it to Tony forthwith.  Tony and I had talked a little later that evening by phone and had been abruptly cut-off by some electrical failure in Albuquerque.  While I was patiently waiting for Tony to call back I was recalling out previous encounter where we had settled some of the difficulties in communications between the two of us.  Every time Tony and I had had some sort of verbal confrontation it seemed to have always prophetically lead to an even more elevated level of sobering communication.  On that previous Thursday night of March the sixteenth I felt that we really had accomplished a great deal of insightful progress in our professional relationship when Tony soulfully addressed the letter that I had sent him in such dramatic protest to his rather insensitive letter of March 1, 2000.  With our relationship at a new high it was this same following Monday, when he had eventually returned that cut-off telephone call that I had suggested at that late moment that we might have dinner at my expense.  The essential accomplishment at that dinner was our mutual agreement that this lawsuit was going to be won by the Plaintiff and that it had adopted an attitude of an all-out war against the aggressive tactics of the Defense.  We both rededicated ourselves to employing every means possible while still maintaining the highest degree of integrity.  It was precisely this mutual respect based on the both of us living up to the highest degree of honesty possible in this otherwise too often treacherous world of ours.  In the course of evaluating exactly where we were at that time and opening ourselves to any addition materials that might have become relevant to the proposed amended filings, something had occurred to me.  I reminded him of a peculiar situation that he and I had previously shared and very possibly too lightly passed over without the due consideration that it might have merited.
            It had been on September 29, 1998 that I had received a call from a Bob Goebel, with whom I had spent in excess of an hour on the telephone discussing all of the ramifications of my lawsuit for others.  We had concluded that that there had been such a broad diversification of ill actions on the part of the American Orchid Society that it would have been impossible to file a single class-action suit.  He suggested that my lawsuit in any event would have certainly benefited others who had experienced the various forms of mis-treatment due to their superior attitude and almost monopolistic behavior in dealing within both the commercial and amateur world of orchids.  Bob had been especially disturbed with a particular incident apparently involving an ad that had appeared in the April 1995 issue of the American Orchid Society Bulletin.  Bob had alleged that there had been some strong objections from unspecified members of the American Orchid Society suggesting that the Bulletin had thoughtlessly published an advertisement that had made specific reference to HIV/AIDS.  No doubt some of these same objectors were equally offended by the notion that AIDS has commonly-held association with a life-style that many bigots would simply wish to annihilate.  The membership certainly retains the right to express their opinions, but these apparently unsolicited objections had wrongfully given rise to the American Orchid Society Bulletin having not subsequently accepted any future ads or making any further mention of Orchid Mania.  Bob had suggested that the then Advertising Coordinator in 1996, Ilonka Edlund had been rather disturbed at the implementation and implication of an unwritten policy of discrimination when she had apparently been instructed to not accept any advertising from Orchid Mania.
            That whole scenario had seemed quite unbelievably upon my first hearing of it.  But the facts were that Ilonka was shortly to have departed her employment with the American Orchid Society as the advertising manager and there had been no further mention or appearance of this Orchid Mania's significant AIDS fundraising activities in the American Orchid Society Bulletin.  It wasn't until the year 2000, well after my lawsuit had been filed in November of 1998, that the American Orchid Society had made any mention of this group.  This is a rather suspicious time-line of events!
            Tony had been intrigued at my having reintroduced this anomaly at that late Monday night dinner in March of 2000 and had instructed me to look into the matter further.  The next day I got out all my copies of the American Orchid Society Bulletin, which by the way changed it name beginning in 1996 to ORCHIDS.  I eventually found the original ad, which appears on the previous page and found no further mention of Orchid Mania since that publication in 1995.  I was also able to determine according to the credits on the title pages that Ilonka Edlund had been the Advertising Coordinator from August of 1995 until February of 1997.  Bob Goebel had sort of suggested that her rather short tenure might have been due in part to her objections to the American Orchid Society's restrictive advertising policy.
            I had wanted to get some further verification on the matter, so in the course of researching the subject, I discovered that Orchid Mania had a rather impressive web site that had first appeared in 1996.  I found that initial introduction date to the World Wide Web rather thought provoking in that it was in same year of 1996 that the ORCHIDS magazine had supposedly first refused to publish any additional ads.  It appears that they had appropriately turned their attentions to establishing a web site as an effective alternative of getting the word out to the orchid world as well as the public at large.  Their web pages contained the names of the founder and the current president of the organization.  When I was unable to reach the founder, Douglas Thompson I decided to get in touch with the current president Brian Metzler.  I had addressed an e-mail to this young gentleman sometime Friday afternoon and it was at about 11:00 P.M. later that night that I had surprisingly received a telephone call from Brian.
            The call was rather interesting in that Brian claimed that he had had no knowledge of any previous rejections on the part of the American Orchid Society's ORCHIDS publication.  He suggested that he had for some time been a close confidant of the founder, Douglas Thompson and was assured that if anything of that nature had previously transpired that there was no apparent reason that he shouldn't have been made aware of it.  He asked me "Who are you?" in a rather strange tone and I responded as diplomatically as possible having not anticipated such a pointedly sounding question.  His redirection of any further comments went to that "I'm not at all interested in the politics of the situation."  He even became a little overly defensive and informed me that the American Orchid Society was going to be doing a feature story on Orchid Mania in the their May issue of ORCHIDS.  That news was very interesting and enlightening in lieu of the American Orchid Society's previous behavior of not even mentioning the name of Orchid Mania.  I didn't relate to Brian Metzler exactly what I had immediately thought of this bit of surprising news.  I had wanted to say that their newly found enthusiasm was no doubt the direct result of my having personally filed a lawsuit against the American Orchid Society for very significantly related issues.  I had no doubt already had a direct effect on the American Orchid Society having adopted a policy of non-discrimination that they had previously avoided and even contended that they had no need of such a policy.  They claimed that they never had any problems that would have necessitated such a policy.  My contention is that they have had a rather bigoted history that simply dealt with the issues in terms of Unwritten Rules.  Their recently created and stated policy of nondiscrimination first appeared in ORCHIDS in their January 1997 issue and notably included "sexual orientation" as well as "disability."  I had been told by Lee Cooke, the Executive Director of the American Orchid Society, that this creation of their new policy was clear evidence that I had "had a significant impact" on the American Orchid Society.  Mr. Cooke further added that their lawyers had sort of admonished them for not having previously incorporated a stated policy of non-discrimination and so stating it in some recognizable format.
            Of course, Brian probably had no prior knowledge of my ongoing impact on the American Orchid Society's policies and I'm confidant that the American Orchid Society would have made no reference as to why they were then enthusiastically changing their attitude towards Orchid Mania.  Brian did depart the rather cool exchange stating that he would look further into the matter, but gave no sincere indication that I would apt to ever have heard from him again.  I had then hoped that the founder, Douglas Thompson might have gotten wind of this exchange and perhaps display a more courageous attitude and response.  I had reported this telephone exchange with Tony and informed him of the forthcoming ORCHIDS' publication of a feature story on Orchid Mania.  This newly disclosed information only added to the intrigue of the case and more than ever suggested that the Defense was truly concerned with the rather questionable legal stance of their principal client.  This revelation only further supported Tony's persistent notion that the Defense could have only likely prevailed on procedural matters.  To further add to that late development, I had later that Friday night gone onto the web and brought up the American Orchid Society's web page, and low and behold!  The first two articles of news dealt directly with the eleven-year history of Orchid Mania's success at raising funds for AIDS and the announcement of another of their forthcoming "garage sales."  It appeared that the American Orchid Society didn't want to wait out their usual four-month lead-time routinely required by the publication of ORCHIDS and make well known to the orchid public and any potential jurors their newly acquired appreciation for the good charitable work of Orchid Mania.
          What was even more revealing about this newly introduced subject was the persistent difficulty I had encountered with any of my efforts to gain more information on the matter surrounding Orchid Mania and its noted absence from ORCHIDS in the late 1990's.  No one seemed to want to talk with me, and if they did at all, the matter seemed to have been more or less conveniently forgotten.  I was certainly suspicious that the Defense had probably suggested to the American Orchid Society that they attempt a little needed damage control just in slight chance that the Plaintiff was to have followed up on the matter.  The perceived obstacles left me more than a little frustrated and if it hadn't been for the ingenuity of the World Wide Web, I would have given some serious thought of giving up the elusive quest.  It was through the use of the web that I had gotten the listings of every Edlund in the Palm Beach area.  By calling one of the numbers on the list on Sunday I had finally reached the "ex-mother-in-law," much to my surprise, and she was kind enough and able to provide me with Ilonka's current telephone number.  I never was able to get any direct response until after 7:00 P.M. her time the next day.  Essentially, Ilonka reported that she couldn't really recall very much about anything except the name of the group, Orchid Mania, and the fact that they had had something to do with AIDS.  I wasn't able to detect any unspoken messages in her voice and with the conversation having been so brief, I had failed to learn her new name or address.  The other concern that Tony and I had was the report from the ex-mother-in-law that Ilonka had plans of returning to her homeland, Aruba.  If she had anything to contribute to this case, Tony had wanted to be sure to subpoena her for a deposition before she had departed for foreign lands.  I had also learned from this bit of investigation that Ilonka's ex-husband was a commercial orchid grower in Lake Worth that was listed in the current American Orchid Society's Almanac.  This told me that if the Defense had wanted to get in touch with Ilonka, it should have been even easier than that of my own www efforts.  I felt confident that Ilonka had probably been forewarned of having some contact with the Plaintiff or Plaintiff's council in this case.  If Ilonka had actually remembered anything, I'm confident that she would have probably been duly persuaded from recalling. 
          With this initial effort having been somewhat met with no great success, I later that evening attempted to reconnect with Bob Goebel, the man who had initially conveyed this rather damaging story about the American Orchid Society and its unwritten advertising policy.  The original telephone number that I had had for Bob still rang through to some business with the name Botana, but the kind lady who had interrupted the message on the answering machine to take the call said that Bob could no longer be reached at "this number."  When I inquired as to his having a new number at which he could be contacted, she replied, "I have a number, but he can't be reached there."  How strange!  I then got onto AOL and wrote him by e-mail to the web address where I had previously been able to reach him.  It was likewise no longer valid and neither were the most recent telephone numbers that I had later retrieved from Orchid Mania's current web site.  Every turn only led to another dead end.  I made another effort at sending a fax, but that was aborted as well.  My last effort was to send a hard copy of my e-mail letter to his previous street address in hopes that it would be duly forwarded.  Just be sure of its proper forwarding without undue interception into the wrong hands, I used John's name instead and his return address on the envelope.  I was getting so paranoid at every turn and with that surprising "witness tampering" just prior to all of this on the part of the Defense, I felt that anything was then quite possible.  Betrayal of the truth was showing up at every turned corner and too few individuals appeared to have had the courage to resist temptation.  The worst realization of all was the fact that so many of my own gay brethren weren't too willing to show their support for whatever fears that they might have perceived and that only added to the notion that "we are too often our own worst enemy."  That old story of thirty pieces of silver kept reminding me of the inherent carnal weakness that appears to be a permanent resident in the characters of most of our fellow travelers through this decaying Garden of Eden.
          It was about a week later that I had received a nice letter from "that lady" who had answered Bob Goebel's old telephone number.  As it turned out, the kind lady was Bob's ex-wife of only about a year.  He had apparently followed the prescribed course of so many middle-aged men who decided to trade-in their old model on a new one.  Knowing that Bob had not dropped off the end of the world, I renewed my efforts at contacting him.  At the suggestion of Bob's ex, I went onto the Botana.net web site and retrieved what appeared to be a current e-mail address.  That yielded no response, but at least the e-mail had not been returned as undeliverable.  I don’t consider Bob Goebel amongst that list of those who betrayed me; I only regret that he wasn’t available just when I needed him the most.  His absence from the scene played the same abandonment tune as all those others who avoided any involvement just when the going got tough.  While on the web site in search for Bob Goebel, I noted that the current web master of Botana.com was another past-AOS associate, Bruce Ide that had once worked for the AOS in Palm Beach.  I wrote him a short e-mail note and suggested that he take a look at my own web site, SanDamiano.net.  He returned a brief note in which he suggested that the AOS had “sadly lost sight of the general membership” and Bruce then wished me well in my legal efforts.

     
                        
A WOMAN SCORNED

     Thy shall not bear false witness against thy neighbor
. I'm not fully convinced that in this present world of ours this profound postulate and one of the Ten Commandments is always adhered to in an environment where truth itself seems an increasingly rare commodity. I had certainly continued to encounter the incessant betrayal of others throughout this whole legal ordeal. Most of my bad experiences were more akin to simply being abandoned as though I had developed some hideous form of the plague. That's not too far from the truth since I did actually acquire full-blown AIDS in the later part of 1995. It was within a month of my rueful diagnosis that I had first met Pete and Lee McAnena. Don and Nona Church, members of the then newly formed orchid group known as the Zia Orchid Growers, called me and said that they had wanted to bring a couple out to San Damiano to have a look at the orchids. This first meeting with Pete and Lee eventually took place on the last Sunday of October.
     I had just recovered from over a month of ill health that had felt to me like a very debilitating case of the common flu. I remember having been very anxiously concerned that the severity of that exhausting encounter with this illness was probably related to my compromised immune system due to the HIV virus that I knew I had had since sometime in 1986. I felt then that with having had some ten years of survival and living pretty much of a normal life without anyone having any actual knowledge that I might have been one of those victims of this outrageous Twentieth Century plague was rather miraculous. I had imagined that it was finally my appointed time to have squarely faced the despairing music. I'm sure that my less than usually bubbly demeanor and drab appearance still showed some slight signs of my having been seriously ill, but the enthusiasm of meeting new people interested in orchids gave me the strength to putting on a good show for the McAnena's benefit. We had dinner that evening at a local cafe and pretty much bonded at that very first meeting. Lee in particular was very warm and she instantly connected with me at a level that I later came to understand was our mutual experience with having to face the possibility of a premature death.
       
Despite my usual suspicions associated with chiropractors in general and their all-too-oftentimes identity with that questionable practice of ambulance chasing and possibly even insurance fraud, I found Lee McAnena's vivacious personality quite alluring.  It is sometimes amazing that we can so easily set aside our misgiving apprehensions when we so easily choose to do so.  Lee routinely assisted her husband in his chiropractic practice and she reminded me so much of my own mother whom very willingly and effectively handled the finances of my stepfather's personal counseling practice.  High on Lee's list of daily duties was the dealing with lawyers, settlement claims and insurance companies.  This constant involvement with lawyers and lawsuits had given rise to Lee's having enrolled in some paralegal courses that helped her have a better grip on guiding the various insurance claims of many of their chiropractic patients.  
      Lee had apparently checked out the local orchid society and wasn't very impressed.  I might add, for good reason!  She liked what she had learned from Nona Church about the people in the Zia Orchid Growers and our own mutual ease at hitting it off at that initial dinner combined to getting her deeply involved.  It was only a couple months before I was hitting on Lee and her husband to consider the American Orchid Society's judging program.  Lee had been growing orchids in her own greenhouse for a considerable number of years and it was quite obvious that she had a real zest for the hobby.  I had explained how the judging program had been most helpful in networking with the orchid community and besides the very good education, it offered the opportunity of a privileged access to orchids that was not always made readily available to the public at large.  My other most pressing motive for having gotten any number of local growers involved was the hope of eventually having an AOS judging center right here in New Mexico.  It is such a long-term and costly commitment that it usually requires people of some means to be able to accomplish the task.  Pete and Lee McAnena had what I considered to being just the right qualifications and temperament to be a part of that orchid future in New Mexico.  
      In February of 1966 I had convinced Pete and Lee to pay a visit to the Great Plains Judging Region in Oklahoma City and get a firsthand impression of what the student-judging program was really all about.  I made the usual Friday trip over on that third Weekend with only Lee aboard, as Pete had to work that Friday.  The trip over gave us the chance to really get to know one another.  I was very encouraging of Lee to get involved despite the fact that I had recently withdrawn from the program because of all the nasty happenings.  I explained most of the problem as simply being more associated with the group in Denver and that the judges in Great Plains had appeared to being a little more tolerant of my life-style and certainly more supportive at this time.  I deliberately avoided sharing any of my health problems with Lee on this trip over to OKC.  To that specific point in time I actually hadn't had any good reason to suspect that anyone outside of my immediate family and only a very few selected friends had any knowledge of my having HIV/AIDS status.  
      That Friday night Lee and I shared a motel room just as I had on so many other orchid occasions with Diann O'Neill.  There was never any appearance of or suspicion of any impropriety with any female companion since my gay orientation was not considered conducive to any sexual misconduct with the opposite sex.  It was, however, apparently something of a new experience for Lee since I remember her specifically requesting that I not tell Pete that we had actually shared a room.  I felt like this was a bit of a risqué adventure for Lee and I believe it only added to our enjoyment of one another and one of those little private intimacies that only helps cement a good relationship.  Lee McAnena was always fun to be with and displayed an exceptionally good sense of humor.  She also kept everything very quite equitable and more than contributed to the shared expenses of these trips to Oklahoma City.  
      Pete flew to Oklahoma City on that Saturday morning and joined us at the Oklahoma State University’s OKC agricultural center where the monthly judging meetings were held.  Both Pete and Lee were each hospitably invited to join one of the judging teams and were instructed to participate as though they were regular students in the program.  This gave them a real taste of the program and Pete and Lee both expressed just how much they really enjoyed the people and were made to feel very much like family.  They both enjoyed participating in the judging despite their having had no previous experience.  The entire meeting turned out to being a good first impression on both sides and Lee began at that point to give serious consideration to getting fully involved.  Pete on the other hand was very interested but realized the difficulty of being at work all day on Friday and being able to be in Oklahoma City the next day in good time for the full program.  The activities started with the student program at 11:00 A.M. and the earliest flight didn't arrive until the noon hour.  
      On the way home that Saturday night from this judging, I felt comfortable enough to have shared with the McAnena's, my delicate health situation.  Their being health professionals, I was sure that they would be sympathetic to my situation and ever more importantly, Lee had most comfortably shared on the way to OKC that she was recovering from cancer.  She confessed that she had had the distinct impression that something serious was going on with me when we had first met.  Lee said that her own close encounter with the imminent possibility of dying gave her a natural instinct of identifying others with similar conditions.  This intimate exchange and sharing of our near-death experiences gave us a particular close connection and understanding of each other's zest for life on a day-to-day basis.  We mutually and with our tongues in cheek coined ourselves "The class of forty-two."
      It was this very immediate Sunday that I had had that most disturbing and fateful of all calls from Bill Heath that eventually led to my overly distressed knowledge that "everyone in the AOS" knew that I had been diagnosed with AIDS.  That was a shocker considering that I had only told immediate family and two other people in the whole world.  We had had a Zia Orchid Growers' meeting that Sunday afternoon, which was very stressful since I had just had that distressful call from Bill Heath that very morning.  Lee with her own health-cross to bear was so exhausted from the OKC quick turnaround trip that only Pete had attended the ZIA meeting.  I should have been home myself except that I didn't want to let on that anything had become rather “rotten in Denmark.”  It was that night that the shit really hit the fan when I finally learned that it was Lois Dauelsberg that had actually let that damn proverbial cat out of the tightly-closed bag and that she was apparently not the only person to have related this once privately held information to Bill Heath.  I didn't share any hint of these very stressful phone calls with Lee until a few weeks later.  
      The next month Lee attended a joint meeting of the Zia Orchid Growers and Escalante Orchid Society in Santa Fe.  This is where Lee got her first bad taste of the local conflict with the Denver judging center.  There were two orchid-judging students from Los Alamos that had recently gotten into the Rocky Mountain judging program and they had obviously been well misinformed and coached on the then non-AOS status of the newly formed Zia Orchid Growers.  They were particularly rude with some of their misinformed comments and Lee found the rather cool atmosphere and reception by some of the Santa Fe snobs that were in attendance so objectionable that she had emphatically suggested to me that ZIA simply have no further association with either the Santa Fe or the Los Alamos individuals.  I had explained that the unusual tensions were not necessarily related to nor shared by the general membership of either group, but most of the stirred-up controversy was certainly attributable to Lois Dauelsberg.  It was shortly after this joint meeting that Lee had related to me that Lorri Ericksen, the only commercial grower in our area, must have likewise had knowledge of my AIDS as Lorri had specifically inquired of Lee as to "how is he doing?" in reference to my health.  Lorri having had such a long relationship with Lois Dauelsberg, it was rationally assumed that Lois Dauelsberg had probably conveyed my HIV/AIDS to Lori in the same contriving and condescending manner as she had related to Bill Heath.  Lee and I continued to make several additional trips to the monthly judgings in OKC for the remainder of the year.  
      In July of that same year 1996, I finally made a trip to Salt Lake City hoping to have learned just who had also informed Jean Schroder of my having AIDS.  I learned that Jean had knowledge on that same fateful Sunday when Bill Heath related that Lois wasn’t the only person that had related their knowing.  It was the very next month following what turned out to being an unsuccessful effort at information gathering that I had acquired the devastating knowledge that Jean Schroder had subsequently and unconscionably communicated my HIVAIDS status to the Oakeleys of England.  Jean had sort of justified her most flippant actions to me by telephone by telling me that after all "everybody in the AOS knows about this" and that "the Oakeleys have a right to know!"  I found this added sarcastic statement of the supposed Oakeley's rights quite objectionable in light of the fact that I had specifically communicated to Jean Schroder on that July trip of my gross objections to the American Orchid Society having violated my specific rights of maintaining the privacy of my HIV/AIDS status.  Jean Schroder had apparently totally disregarded my stated objections and proceeded to tell any number of other people in the orchid world.  Upon hearing of this egregious breech of my private information, Lee McAnena began suggesting that the rising problems with American Orchid Society's deliberate refusal to appropriately address the situation might need to be approached in a serious legal fashion.  This was, of course, Lee's particular area of extensive experience.  It was then that I had assembled all of my saved paperwork to that point at Lee's strong urging and started taking immaculate notes on everything associated with the problem.  I never did throw anything away, but it was specifically Lee McAnena that had gotten me in the habit of making extensive notes to myself on a regular basis.  That note taking was eventually the very groundwork of the first book that I had subsequently written.  Lee became my most attentive confidant and I kept her posted on every little bit of related information that subsequently arose from the dastardly situation.  
      It was in large part due to my relentlessly encouraging Lee to get involved with the judging program despite all the increasing turmoil that gave rise to my own re-involvement with the AOS.  What was good for the gander was certainly appropriate for the goose!  In October I had received a rather intriguing call from Mr. Lee Cooke, the executive director of the American Orchid Society and upon sharing the provocative contents of this communication with Lee McAnena, she had suggested that I immediately put into writing the jest of the entire conversation.  That exercise helped me to better understand the most likely plausible but totally unexpressed covert motives of Mr. Cooke and later led to my writing a rather rightfully caustic letter to the man.  That letter, no doubt was the central reason that this misguided Executive of the AOS later made it his own business to “deal rather harshly” with this thorn in the side of the AOS hierarchy.  It was just a week later that Lee McAnena was along for another of those monthly trips to OKC for what had to be my greatest award triumph in the American Orchid Society.  One of my better specimen plants, Odontoglossum Rawdon Jester 'San Damiano' received the highest quality award available, a First Class Certificate (FCC/AOS) for mounting up more than ninety points from the judging team that was assigned the plant.  At that same monthly judging this plant also scored more than ninety points for a Certificate of Cultural Merit (CCM/AOS).  This award gave me that one-up position on the only other judge in the program with whom I had any friendly ongoing competition.  Max Thompson had probably received more awards at the Great Plains Center than any of the other judges and it was Diann and I who encouraged Max to participate individually in display competition where he began to rank up the same kind of consistent winning that we had experienced.  
     
The next month, November was full of excitement.  I had that infamous encounter with the Trustees in Baltimore and at the business meeting of Great Plains on the third Saturday I was officially reinstated as a student judge in the AOS judging program.  Lee had also been officially accepted into the student-judging program.  I had thought that maybe we were possibly on our way to becoming judges and hopefully fulfilling that aspiration of establishing an orchid-judging center in New Mexico.  Boy, was I ever wrong!  I should have had some clue that things weren't going to come out OK, but it is only hindsight that is generally 20-20.  
     
When Lee and I had been initially interviewed several month prior for student status that had been finalized officially that November, there had already been a tail-tail sign of things to come.  Berneice Miller had been assembling the three-party teams to be conducting the routine interviews.  Lee had been standing next to a certified judge and the then Treasurer of Great Plains, Kenneth Fielder.  When Berneice had queried Mr. Fielder as to serving on the team to interview “Dr. Walker, he offered a rather negative reply in his refusing to consider "someone like that!"  Lee McAnena had reported this rather snide comment to me and I explained that it wasn't at all unexpected as Kenneth regularly traveled to Oklahoma City from Tulsa with the infamous Dr. John Kramer, the very judge that turned out to being that consummate bigot.  They seemed to have shared pretty common attitudes about nearly everything including their shared negative opinion about me and I would have strongly suspected that Kenneth Fielder was as big of a bigot as his bosom-buddy, Dr. John Kramer.  
      In the meantime, Pete McAnena had decided to get himself more involve with orchids and planned on setting up a laboratory for the flasking of seeds.  He converted a portion of his garage into a state-of-the-art laboratory and approached the whole project like an excited wide-eyed kid.  Pete viewed this project of his as a very significant contribution to our plans of having New Mexico become a thriving orchid center.  Pete had offered to do all the lab work that would have been such an integral part of the San Damiano orchid business.  I had even arranged for Pete to meet R. J. Rands of Malibu, California and take a look at his own lab setup.  Ray Rands is an excellent orchid grower and hybridizer that does all his own flasking.  His particular specialty is Paphiopedilums.  Lee McAnena was excited about her husband's projected contribution and sad that this lab work was right up his alley being that it is so science based.  Even though it appeared that Pete wasn't apt to have engaged himself in the student-judging program, this was his way of adding something significantly needed for the growth of orchids in the Southwest.  
      By the time the first of the year had rolled around, Lee had pretty much influenced me to seek council and initiate some form of legal action.  I ended up engaging a lawyer that had been suggested by Ray Gabaldon.  Because lawyers typically suggest that clients cease talking to anyone that might be at all involved with any potential litigation, I had cooled a great deal of my usual attentions with others associated with the American Orchid Society, Lee McAnena included, but certainly to some lesser degree since she was such a close associate and the very person that had encouraged me to pursue the matter further.  Of course, Lee still remained my closest confidant in most all of those various and sundry matters involving the American Orchid Society's most questionable misconduct, and particularly since Diann O'Neill was still residing in Texas.  
      It was as things began to deteriorate that summer with those first floundering lawyers that Lee starting hinting and strongly suggesting that I might want to pursue the lawsuit as a Pro Se litigant.  She had suggested that I might explore that possibility with a then good friend of hers and lawyer, Judith Finfrock.  I sort of put the whole situation on the proverbial back burner and had once again hoped that I might have gotten the matter settled without the further employment of any lawyers at all or even the involvement of litigation.  The potential of my finally being elevated from student to probationary judge was finally being addressed towards the end of 1998 and I had pretty much turned my attentions in that more positive direction.  Lee had suffered sort of an unexpected setback with her own health situation and her attendance to monthly judgings became rather sporadic.  It was sometime during this period of time that I had shared with Lee just how lucky I had been to have been introduced to the State of New Mexico medication programs specifically designed for people living with AIDS.  I was likewise fortunate to have had the Ryan White program that paid some of my medical bills that I couldn’t have possibly met because I had no medical insurance to cover the high costs of the HIV/AIDS medication.
      When I had first met with Dr. Koster in January of 1996, I had not wanted to start any of the medication regimens for my HIV.  I had previously shared the psychological care of some of my own clients with the medical care of some of Dr. Koster's AIDS patients while I was working as a volunteer therapist at the New Mexico Aids Services.  This was back in the early 1980's when AIDS victims were dying almost daily that I had made up my mind that I didn't want to endure the awful side effects of medications and the often-false hopes usually associated with many of the earlier treatments.  Dr. Koster had insisted that I at least try the newest proposed regimen that had just been approved, which was soon to be designated as the cocktail.  I conceded to his convincing urging with the specific understanding that I would only take the medications, if in doing so, it might actually benefit some future recipient.  When I related that I had no insurance or other viable means of meeting the high costs, Dr. Koster said that there were some great programs available to people with full-blown AIDS.  The next thing I knew, I was meeting with the University of New Mexico Health Center's resident social worker and filling out all kinds of paperwork.  It was ironic that UNM, was now going to be aiding me, where I had once unselfishly given them more than a year of my professional time as a volunteer some ten years prior.  Our good deeds and charities that go around just sometimes thankfully come around!  Good karma?
     
I later shared this unsolicited blessing with Lee McAnena and told her that I was so lucky to have rearranged my personal holdings and finances some years previous because I had then seriously thought that I was going to be dead.  People were routinely dying from this awful disease!  My sister had never taken any action on the transfers of my interest in some of my real estate holdings, including that of my personal residence, with that compassionate consideration of my enjoying the appearance of living a normal life until I had expected to die.  I kept living way beyond any of the then reasonable expectations and the previously executed deeds had gotten trustfully filed away until they were to be deemed as necessary.  So much time had past that I wasn't even sure who had the deeds or where they had been placed.  I shared all of this rather personal information and my concerns with Lee McAnena, trusting that she was the kind of confidant one could confide in.  Having wanted to be most sincere and honest about the accurate reporting my holdings as being in my sister's name, I suggested that I may have had the need to execute newer documents that clearly indicated just what had been my previously earnest intentions.  I don’t like to be in the situation of having any appearance of impropriety.  
      Well, all of this confidentiality concerning my having done the right thing with Lee came back to unjustly haunt me with her later suggesting to the Defense that I had asked her to falsify some "affidavit" about my financial status or holdings.  What was so ridiculous about her maliciously contrived accusations was the fact that I hadn't even know her long enough for my supposedly solicited  "false statement" to have had any legal credibility.  If I had really needed to solicit some false statement, I would have rightfully engaged the help from someone who actually knew of the original transactions that had been fully executed in the late 1980's or at the very least, someone who knew me back then.  I have many very close and trusted friends that I would have more likely engaged in such an uncouth and certainly unexpected behavior for me, had I really needed someone.  Lee had spitefully implied that I had made false statements in order to get "free medication" from the State of New Mexico.  The truth of the matter is that I had actually forgotten this whole scenario because I was later quite self-assured that the documentation was somewhere to be found.  
      It was December 16, 1999 that Lee had called the house as a follow-up to a letter that she had composed on the 15th and sent to me.  She had gotten John on the phone in my absence.  She spent almost an hour trying to get John to agree with her biased and contrived take on this totally fabricated story of hers.  She had absolutely no luck with him as none of her bullshit held up under the truth and facts of the matter and when I had returned later that evening and returned her call; Lee once again attempted to indict me with the same bit of crap.  She was so doggedly persistent that it soon became all too obvious that she was on some sort of devious mission.  I remember having the very distinct feeling that she was probably on a fishing expedition specifically for the Defense.  I willingly played along just to see where she was attempting to carry the story while never giving in to her unfounded flights of contrived fantasy.  I immediately shared this misguided woman's attempted indictment of me with Tony, and he only responded with the flippant suggestion that it was probably only the verbal rattling of some aging idiot.  It was so out in left-field that he suggested that I not pay any attention to her and simply avoid any further contact with the bitch.  In any case, I decided to retort her accusations in her letter as well as this bizarre telephone call by immediately writing the following letter:

December 18, 1999

Lee McAnena  
….  
Placitas, New Mexico 87043-34

Re:  Your letter of December 15, 1999

Dear Lee:

      I wish to be clear on some of your "facts."  You said that I had asked you to "falsify an affidavit a couple of years ago regarding all of your assets so that you could continue receiving your meds from taxpayer dollars while I have to pay all of my expenses."  Not so!  I had made a statement that the home I live in belonged to my sister.  I could not find any evidence (an executed deed) of that fact and related this to you in confidence saying that I may needed to execute a deed and date it so that it would support my thought to be false statement.  I don't like to lie, and I had made the claim in good faith.  I was very disturbed that I couldn't support the fact.  I believe you said that you wouldn't be willing to do that, even though I was only trying to create what I thought was already in existence.  I had actually executed deeds for ALL properties of any value to my sister many years ago when I thought I was going to be dead.  If you had brought the subject to my attention again/later, you would have learned that the reason I did not have any actual documentation in hand was because my sister had retained the deed that had been executed sometime in 1991.   It was at about that same time that I also singed over my apartments.  
      I realize that you NOW don't support what I am now attempting in Court, BUT it was you that encouraged me to file a lawsuit Pro Se with the help of your friend Judith Finfrock.  You may remember our first gathering at Applewood's on the West Side of town—Coors Road.  Judith agreed that there was a case, and it was at that very meeting, in your presence, that I asked whether it was necessary to include Max Thompson since he admitted being the AOS person to disclose my HIV/AIDS condition to Dr. John Kramer.  You didn't seem to object to Judith's insistence that he be counted as one of the defendants.  If you may recall, I said that I would not make the choice myself because of my close friendship with Max.  Personally I would have left him out of the pleadings, BUT it was the advice of your close friend the lawyer that indicated the legal reasons that he was to be named in the suit.  Of course, his participation was not with the maliciousness displayed by the others!  
      I wish I were as rich as too many people think I am.  I'm only too generous!  You may recall my telling you of my initial statement when I discovered this property many years ago; "I will never own this land, but I will be the caretaker."  Like Saint Francis!  Its material appearance is largely due to the decorating ability of John, not the actual value of its contents.  A matter that has no legal bearing on this case.

Very Truly yours

                                    Joe

      It was in a couple of days that I received another note from Lee where it became even more obvious that she was once again attempting to “document” our telephone exchange and confirm her false accusations.  

December21, 1999

Dear Joe,

As promised in our conversation a quick response to your letter. I think you had a senior moment in regards to Max. Applewood Restaurant is in OKC. Yes, I encouraged you to go pro se after your first attorneys dropped the case. I was at your home going through reams of legal paper and eating Chinese food when I found out that Max was to be included in the suit. I expressed my upset about Max being included in the action. You told me you did not have a choice.

The meeting you referred to occurred at Applebees’ when you met my friend Judith Finfrock. Judith covered many aspects of the action from research, costs, legal strategies, and defendants. The conversation did not center around Max. As I recall the main event was how much money could be had from the AOS and if there was a basis for the lawsuit under ADA as well as other tort possibilities. You also covered your reasons for wanting to bring the claim which was counter to the money issue. As I recall Judith was answering a lot of questions that you had regarding the entire matter. I was not involved in any of the decision making between you and Judith at that meeting or at any other time.

You know how many times I have expressed to you that I am heartsick that Max was included in the lawsuit. I know you have stated that you did not have a choice, and you are trying to rectify the situation in the legal area; that is a major chore. I hope it is resolved in Max’s best interest.

Lastly, I want to clarify the matter of the affidavit. You specifically asked me to back date an affidavit regarding your property. I told you that I could not do and would not.

Let’s keep the communication lines open and save some trees by using the invention of Alexander Graham Bell.

        Lee  

      At the precise time of these rather strange and certainly transparent calls and letters from Lee McAnena in December of 1999, my sister was in Denver, Colorado visiting her son, Matthew, before coming to San Damiano for the Christmas holidays.  I called her and made a query as to the existence and/or whereabouts of such executed deeds.  She said that she was assured that they actually existed and were probably filed away somewhere amongst her own papers back in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.  She had plans of remaining in this part of the country until after the New Year.  This left me a little more than anxious through the holidays wondering if they actually existed at all or maybe my mind was just failing me.  As soon as my sister got back to Ft. Lauderdale in January 2000, she had found the executed deeds in question and was surprised to find that they had been executed several years before we had even thought they were.  The actual timing of their execution, in hindsight, was probably more appropriate because the deeds had been executed not too long after I had initially been tested positive for the HIV virus.  It was also to our mutual surprise that I had also executed another deed that clearly gave my sister sole ownership of the eight-plex apartment building on Chelwood Park Blvd in Albuquerque.  These apartments had already been placed in both of our names so that I could have continued reporting the income on my own returns until my then ultimate death.  So much for the possibly perceived need to execute any newer documents!  
     
It was with these same phone calls that Lee McAnena said that she had heard from some undisclosed sources that the Defense was very aptly going to use this misbegotten information to indict me as a dishonest person.  She had said that I should be duly warned and I wondered then if that statement had been more of prescribed covert threat from the Defense.  It is interesting that Lee had so arrogantly and inadvertently confessed that it had to have been her alone that had offered this surreptitiously conceived information. It was only Lee McAnena own malicious twisting of what I had only and earnestly shared in confidence that the Defense had any knowledge of.  As I had rightfully expected, both of the Defense lawyers were taken in with her twisted offerings and during my four-day deposition had specifically addressed this unsolicited and very maliciously introduced matter.  Why wasn't I surprised?  This littler scenario turned out to be perhaps that very best example of the intentionally malicious betrayal of anyone associated with the American Orchid Society.  The American Orchid Society should have elevated Lee McAnena to fully accredited judge since she had performed in such a deceptive manner that was so in keeping with the rest of the circling vultures.  Birds of a feather really do seem to flock together and not for the best of reasons.  Lee fully showed-off her true and spiteful colors!  
      It seems that most malicious people who cognitively set out to betray their close associates always have some carefully thought out and rationalized reason for their begotten treachery.  Lee had expressed several other points of contention, which she no doubt had cleverly incorporated into her own twisted scheme of justification.  She emphatically expressed her total disapproval of my having named Max Thompson in the lawsuit as one of the individual Defendants.  What was so strange about that particular point of contention was that Judith Finfrock, her own friend, had made that specific call specifically for legalistic reasons that I had left to Judith’s professional judgment since I had always considered Max such a good friend.  I frequently solicited the objectivity of others only to insure that I am doing the right thing.  Max Thompson had been included as a defendant simply because he had apparently been the original/initial source of my privately held medical information being disclosed to others in the American Orchid Society.  Ms. Finfrock had rightfully suggested that I couldn't have held him legally harmless since I had had the direct knowledge of his having been the very person who disclosed this information to Dr. John Kramer—it would have been prejudicial to the integrity of the entire lawsuit.  It was Max himself that had personally volunteered this very fact directly to me.  
      While on this very same subject, I had filed the original lawsuit on Friday the thirteenth of November in 1998.  That very day the Federal District Court in New Mexico had shut down their operations with the exception of the clerk's office where they were still accepting the filing of new cases.  The shutdown lasted through the entire next week and the Clerk's office reopened on Monday the twenty-third.  It was on the Thursday the nineteenth that Lee McAnena had come out to San Damiano to bring me some plants that I was to take to judging on her behalf.  She had specifically asked if I would give her a copy of the filed lawsuit.  I politely refused with the explicit excuse that I didn't want to let any of the copies out until I had had a chance to give all of the interested parties (of my choice!) each a copy simultaneously.  I had left for Oklahoma City the next day for monthly judging and sometime after I had left home, John received a call from Max Thompson.  Max said that he had been made aware that the filed lawsuit had included him as an individual defendant.  Max further added in sort of a defensive tone for having had the undisclosed knowledge of the filing, "it is after all a matter of public record."  He went on to saying something like, "I hope Joe doesn't take all my money."  No one should have had any knowledge of my having even filed the lawsuit much less any of the contents.  I had known that Lee had this specific interest in the matter of Max being named, but I had already become suspicious of her actions and very cognitively avoided her having any knowledge of the lawsuit’s specific contents until I had had a chance to deal with its being known by all.  There was a large stack of the reproduced lawsuit in my library and I'm confident that at some point Lee had serendipitously retrieved a copy for herself, or at the very least took a good look at one in my absence.  When later questioned about whether she had taken one, she claimed that she had gotten a copy from the Court.  It would have been impossible for her to have retrieved a copy during the week in question because the entire Federal Court operations was closed for the purpose of moving into their new building on Lomas Boulevard in Albuquerque.  The one thing for sure was that Lee alone had to have been the exclusive information pipeline to Max.  This gabby connection was later confirmed while I had been working on Diann O'Neill's new greenhouses in Corrales.  It was just a couple of days after Diann's greenhouse had its temporary roof blown off that she had received a call from Max Thompson.  In the course of his making those usual small-talk comments he told Diann that he had heard that her roof had blown off.  I specifically remember having related this publicly un-broadcasted bit of news to Lee McAnena the very evening of its occurrence and to absolutely no one else as I was too busily engaged on a daily basis at the construction site.  It was only Lee that could have possibly passed this information along to someone else living way back in Kansas.  I'm sure that Max thought he had nothing to hide in passing that information along, but its disclosure clearly indicted Ms. McAnena.  The specific image I have of these two devious scenarios is the purple dyes used in water to detect its flow and direction as well as for the detection of leaks.  In this case, the leaks are obviously of a verbal/informational nature.  
      Lee McAnena's other and far more personal point of contention was her roundabout expressly stated jealousy of her own narrow-minded perception of my ostentatiously residing in such a "grand house."  She found this particularly offensive because I was receiving my life-saving medications from the State of New Mexico without costs, while she lived in a “smaller” though more than adequate house and "had to pay for her own meds herself!"  But of course, she had medical insurance that I never had for myself.  This was so ridiculous since we both were so lucky to have even been alive and Lee's own home is far above anything considered average by any reasonable economic standard of contemporary living.  This newly discovered and disappointing image of Lee's selfish nature, thoughts and behavior brought to mind the infamously news media contrived reputation of Leona Helmsley, that Queen of Luxury Hotels in New York City.  This was not a very nice image of someone whom I had once considered one of my very closest friends.  
      Perhaps the worst of all of Lee's reasons for her irrational betrayal was my rather awkward handling of a rather delicate matter where she had presented one of her plants for judging and had possibly inadvertently failed to have included the actual clonal name.  Of course, I am very suspicious that she had known exactly what she was doing and that it wasn't at all kosher.  It was a plant that I only later became aware that she had acquired from an order that three of us member of the Zia Orchid Growers had placed with a good orchid buddy of mine, Masa Chen, proprietor of Orchids of Waianae.  Masa had named a particularly good clone of a selfing of Blc. Erin Kobayashi 'Lahaina Gold' for his daughter, Amy Chen and had included several of these prized plants in the order as a special favor to me.  I specifically remember these plants having been part of that delivered order because I had already received one of these 'Amy Chen' clones as part of an earlier order.  I had specifically suggested to Lee that she take one of these more valued plants as one of her individual selections.  It was on a subsequent judging about a year later that the Lee's plant had received an AM award where Lee had assigned her own 'Sierra Madre' clone name to that awarding.  This was highly irregular and even though I was suspicious of that clonal naming when the award was originally made, I didn't wish to cause any further disputes in light of the then impending litigation.  
      As luck would have had it, this particular plant ended up receiving a national award.  Since Masa had always treated me with the greatest of respect and had probably included these rather expensive clones as his own personal way of showing appreciation for our long-time and close relationship, I felt particularly responsible to try and have the awkward situation somehow rectified.  It was of particular importance to me since that clone had been originally named for Masa's daughter.  I had made the decision in keeping with my persistent effort of always trying to do the right thing, despite my already rapidly declining and most compromised reputation with the American Orchid Society, and address this delicate issue as tactfully as I could.  The national award would still be valid and belong solely to Lee McAnena in any case.  I was only concerned that Masa should be given the rightful recognition for having cloned this plant with his own daughter's name.  I then wrote a letter to the Chairman of the Great Plains Judging Center, yes, Max Thompson and suggested what I knew about the mis-entered plant and left it to his own discretion as to how to handle the awkward matter:

October 27, 1999                                                   

Max Thompson  
Winfield, KS XXXXX

Max,

I am pleased to learn that another national award has been granted to a New Mexico grower.

I do not have any problem with the award or the recipient.  There is, however, a slight problem with the clonal name.  As the copy of the enclosed letter to Orchid of Waianae indicates, there was an order placed, and when it arrived it contained several clones of Blc. Erin Kobayashi 'Amy Chen.'  Amy Chen is Masa Chen's daughter.  I distinctly remember these clones being amongst the order and suggesting to the other participants that they might want to take one for its superior quality—I already possessed one on the originals from a previous order as a gift from Masa.

The original clone was the result of a selfing of the originally awarded Erin Kobayashi.  I had received in the earliest part of this decade several siblings from the same selfing and one of them had this darker lip.  I had hoped to enter it for judging, but after Masa bloomed this superior one (much darker lip), I abandoned any hope of mine ever being considered an improvement.

I do not recall any of the original Erin Kobayashi selfings being included in this shipment.  Masa has always been extremely generous with me as you may know and his having included several "expensive" clones would not be uncommon.  I shared these plants with Lee and Karl because I already had them in my own collection.

I'm confident that Lee must have simply failed to transfer the proper clonal name to her own tags.  Once again, the clone had never received an AOS award, and I fully concur with its having received the national Cattleya award—rightfully belonging to Lee as the grower, but there might be a serious consideration of correcting the clonal name rightfully to 'Amy Chen.'

I do not intend to make an issue of this matter, but I am deeply concerned that Masa Chen receives any benefits for having cloned this particular Erin Kobayashi.

                   
                                   Joe

     Lee had claimed to have lost all of the original tags that had come with the original order and said that anything was quite possible.  It was certainly a reasonable explanation except that a good orchid grower usually pays particularly special attention to labels since the misplacement of labels renders plants of no value.  Lee McAnena had said to me that she had wished that I had contacted her first.  It was only my idea that if Max had indeed found no substantial reason to have made any changes in the name; it might have saved Lee McAnena from any unnecessary stress.  So much for the intended diplomatic handling!  No doubt Lee felt betrayed by me, but one of the expressed rules in the Handbook on Judging is the responsibility of any AOS orchid judge (students included) to report any misgivings involving a plant that may have inadvertently been incorrectly entered for judging.  I had been so concerned about doing the right thing that I had even anxiously consulted Diann O'Neill on the matter before I employed the means of writing that above-included letter to Max Thompson.  I would have been damned if I did as I was and equally damned if I didn't!  What's an honest man to do?   We have all heard that "two wrongs don't make a right!"  
     
In the midst of the immediately above reported betrayal there was another bit of unwarranted skullduggery involving Lee McAnena.  It was just after the lawsuit had been filed that I had received a call from Francis Schmidt who reported that she had heard that "I was loosing it!"  Stan and Francis Schmidt came to our home for dinner shortly thereafter and despite my exerted diplomatic efforts I was unable to get Francis to disclose her mysterious source of my insanity.  John and I fully explained the probable situation giving rise to such a odorous rumor and assured the Schmidt's that I was quite sane and was fully in control of my all of my faculties, social and otherwise.  It was also at about this same period of time that several other friends in the local orchid world betrayed my once trusted friendship and it was of some noted coincidence that they were all close associates of Lee McAnena including Francis.  The Schmidt's had no personally held reason to have so abruptly discontinued their once more familiar and positive association with me, and since that fateful dinner I haven't received a single word.  Worst of all, they haven't even had the common decency to ever fully thank me for them having taken home one of my very best Cattleya species the night of that dinner.  I had thought of them as though they were family since Stan's and my own unique story of getting involved with orchids in period of our youths had had such familiar and shared experiences.  So much for those fair-weathered friends and other weak associates!  
      Meanwhile, back to Lee McAnena.  In March of 1997 there had been a rather large orchid show in Wichita to which all of the then four students from New Mexico had attended together.  It was at this particular show that I had been invited to give a talk on Odontoglossums as one the three-featured speakers of this semi-annual SWROGA meeting.  This was the meeting where another Great Plains' student, David M. Gayle had overheard the covert efforts of Lois Dauelsberg to have my presentation notably boycotted.  Apparently the word had actually gotten out because Dr. Berneice Miller had reported her own personal concern about this unsavory matter to Lee McAnena just outside the appointed lecture room while Berneice was there frantically recruiting anyone to fill the room as her own manner of rendering what she perceived as some seriously needed damage control.  I had heard of these unscrupulous efforts directly from David Gayle, but it was Lee McAnena's reporting of Dr. Miller's personal concern that had indicated just how serious the matter might have become without Dr. Miller's agitated intervention.  
      It was later that evening that the New Mexico delegation had specifically decided to not attend the Saturday evening events and remain in the Hotel.  We had sent out for pizza and beer and celebrated with the addition of Larry McGrath.  Among the various events of the evening, the most interesting memory was of Lee grabbing her two breasts and jokingly, in a shaking-them-babies manner, suggestively offering them to the boys.  She had such a good sense of unrestrained humor and always seemed so very comfortable around gay men.  I had found it difficult to have finally realized that she had so betrayed my once giving trust.  As I had wrapped up this little recall in preparation for the impending deposition of Lee McAnena, it also occurred to me in the prophetic words of Tony Romo that she had undoubtedly become the deep-throat for the Defense.  
      Lee McAnena had to have been the only betrayer outside of the American Orchid Society insiders that could have also alerted the Defense of the critical indiscretion of the American Orchid Society having to do with their having previously and notably avoided any editorial relationship with Orchid Mania.  I had made mention of my contacts with Bob Goebel in my second book, but nowhere had I mentioned that Bob had anything to add about the American Orchid Society refusing to publish anything that made reference to Orchid Mania and their association with HIV/AIDS through their fundraising.  I avoided writing anything that about which I hadn't had at least some direct knowledge.  I did, however share this bit of information with Lee McAnena as well as almost everything else that had had any relationship whatsoever with the various facts of the lawsuit.  
      Tony had requested of the Defense that I be present for Lee McAnena's deposition on the fifth of April.  The session lasted some four hours and for the most part Lee had responded rather honestly to questions with the expected bent of presenting an aggressive indictment of my good character and reputation.  There were definitely several very specific misrepresentations of the truth focused on my allegedly misrepresenting the actual ownership of San Damiano and Lee's contrived falsehood of my having asked her to "falsify an affidavit" about my finances.  The new twist on this last item was her testifying that I had requested this misdeed in the presence of two witnesses.  Ask me if I had been surprised by the mention of their names.  She claimed that this incident had taken place specifically on a return trip from that orchid show in Wichita.  What she had so fatally failed to remember that would have lent no credibility to her falsehoods was recalling that I made that particular return trip home totally on my back with an attack of the gout.  I wasn't saying anything to anybody!  I'm sure that she had chosen that particular time and trip because it was true that those other witnesses were along for the same ride.  
      There had been a couple of specific incidences that I wasn't sure that I was going to be able to get into testimony because the witnesses had probably been persuaded to not testify.  One of the events was my presentation at that Wichita show having been deliberately and covertly boycotted.  Well, in an answer to the Defense's query as to how Lee McAnena could possibly demonstrate just how unpopular I was with other members of the orchid judging community, she offered that she was present when a "large" number of judges had left the room at the Wichita meeting when my particular presentation was to have begun.  In the same instance Shannon Parden asked if my bad reputation had anything to do with the American Orchid Society or my having been gay or having AIDS.  Of course, Lee was emphatic that the AOS and its judges were perfectly innocent of any wrongdoing.  Shannon had also inquired as to the quality of student that Lee thought I had been and Lee proceeded to explain that I was no better than any of the other students with the possibly exception of my exceptional horticultural skills.  I can't remember Shannon Parden addressing any substantive points that went to the actual counts in the case.  
      I felt that the Defense had spent entirely too much time addressing Lee McAnena's overly emotional and irrationally intense displeasure with my have included Max Thompson in the lawsuit and the events that surrounded that issue.  Lee was adamant about my having accused her of stealing a copy of the filed lawsuit as though I had implied that she had actually broken into my house like a thief.  She employed as a defense that fact that she had only entered my home once when I had not been present in order to show some friends my greenhouses.  The real truth of the matter is that my doors have always been left unlocked and open to anyone at almost anytime.  Had she been aware that my accusation had to do only with the very week immediately following the filing of the suit, she wouldn't have had to such a loosely stated defense.  No one understandably wants to admit any wrongdoing.  Lee did address the specific time I had in mind and admitted that I had refused to give her a copy of the lawsuit and she placed herself voluntarily in my library by describing the large box filled with copies of the lawsuit that she had observed.  She said that she hadn't taken one, but it is interesting that she knew what was there.  This was the Thursday following my filing of the lawsuit and the day before Max Thompson had call and talked with John about the lawsuit being, after all, “a matter of public record” as though he had been made aware of it having just been filed.  I had kept the matter of its being filed quite secret until, as I had conveyed to Lee McAnena, I was able to put copies of the filed complaint into everyone hands at the same precise moment.  Only Lee could have informed Max of its contents or its very filing.  Lee had testified that she hadn't sent Max Thompson a copy of the lawsuit until sometime that next January after she had acquired a copy directly from the Court.  But, she also admitted that she had already received a copy from me with the cover letter suggesting, "You may be called to testify in conjunction with the enclosed lawsuit."  My only pertinent question is why couldn't Lee have just sent a copy of the lawsuit that she had received in late November instead of waiting and going to the trouble of retrieving a copy from the Court.  Her various accounts just didn't hold together in any logical manner.  And, Tony got Lee McAnena to admit that she had never relayed to Max the very fact that I had specifically discussed with her the real possibility of eventually releasing him from the complaint, probably during the discovery phrase, simply because I had always contended that his initial disclosure to Dr. John Kramer was never malicious in nature.  I had assumed that John Kramer's rather specious demeanor had sucked him in to believing that he was as trustworthy as they come as readily as the rest of us.   I would have liked to think that Lee would have told Max the actual reason for his inclusion in the filed complaint, particularly since it was such an issue for Lee herself.  I believe one might want to consider her actions or lack thereof as simply a sin of omission.  Isn't that really paramount to actually lying?  
      Lee had also made a poignant point to state that I had lied about Judith Finfrock being part of the legal team and that is was specifically against Judith's actual wishes.  She had come to this false conclusion because my letter seeking funds had included that original contingency agreement with mention names of the variously stated intended councils.  Judith had been specifically included at my request to receive five-percent specifically because I have always had the policy of giving credit where credit was due.  In other words, Judith was there for me when I desperately needed some legal assistance at getting the original complaint filed before my statue of limitations had been totally exhausted.  Had Judith had the time she had stated an interested in being part of the legal team if for no other reason but to have had an experience in a Federal Court.  In any case, Judith could have eventually been an integral part of our legal team despite the fact that she had never officially filed with the District Count in New Mexico.  
      What was most personally dramatic about the overall pathetically contrite performance of Lee McAnena was the terribly morose manner in which she had so pathetically depicted herself as such a hate-filled victim.  At my last session with the Defense's psychologist, Dr. Roll had asked me to tell him which event in my life was the singularly most traumatic for me.  I had specifically explained to him that it was getting the knowledge that "everybody knew I had AIDS."  It was not because I was at all embarrassed or ashamed in any way.  I had deliberately and cognitively decided upon first learning that I was HIV-positive to maintain that knowledge in the strictest degree of confidentiality.  I had made that glaring resolution specifically because I had never wanted to be placed in the role of a victim that was very apt to be treated significantly different than any other normal person.  I wanted to live whatever remainder of my life just as I had lived it prior to such an awfully imposed death-sentence.  One of Lee McAnena's greatest outrages and expressions of such anger was my having dealt with the matter of her highly awarded plant just when she was so terribly stricken with a reoccurrence of her cancer.  She was likewise most angered at my rich life-style while she had to pay for her own death-threatening cancer herself.  The poor dear depicted herself as such an emotional victim that was so put upon by someone who didn't take into account her poor, poor health and stricken condition.  Another letter that was written within days of Ray Gabaldon's father having died was also employed to so brutally indict my good integrity.  I was pictured as being so terribly insensitive for my actions because these two “violated” people were at that respective time, victims themselves.  I didn't even know that Lee was recovering from an operation at the time she felt so awfully offended because I had never been so informed; she had chosen not to talk with me.  And, that untimely letter wasn't even addressed to or about Ray Gabaldon.  The point is and had always been that I never, never wanted anyone, for any reason to treat me in any different manner than usual/normal just because I was HIV positive or had been diagnosed with AIDS.  The overly dramatic performance of Lee McAnena as "OH POOR ME!" was quite disgusting in my eyes and it only reminded me of precisely what I had so hoped to avoid in the execution of my own actions by absolutely NO one knowing that I was a victim of HIV/AIDS.  I still don't want to be remembered as only some terribly bitter person who had died of AIDS.   I REFUSE TO BE THAT VICTIM!  
      I had initially written the first part of this chapter as an exercise in preparation for the deposition of Lee McAnena and to possibly provide a basis for some of the questions that Tony might have wanted to present.  Even though I had reported the essence of what had taken place at the time the deposition took place, I did not have the actual manuscript that had been later reproduced by the court reporter.  I wanted to give you a more precise idea of the questions and answers in their original words that were actually exchanged between councils and Ms. Lee McAnena.  In any case, just the words couldn’t have possibly portrayed the very intense emotional performance that was given by Lee.  Since I was personal present at this particular deposition, I couldn’t justify the costs of having an original copy of the proceeding.  Just for your own information a complete copy of these proceedings would have costs the Plaintiff a mere $ 1450.00.  The total costs of this particular deposition was estimated by Tony to being something in the neighborhood of around $ 3700.00 and this amount may be justifiably considered a bit on the low side since the deposition was taken in the offices of the Defendant’s own retained law firm, thus saving the additional cost of a rented location.  And of course, they didn’t have to pay Lee for her most disingenuously dramatic and fraudulently contrived performance.
 
      Of some interest, it was too long after all of this had transpired before Lee has died.  This should be a lesson to anyone who may believe that they can escape their karma; it just isn't worth it!

 

              
             
APPEARANCES BETRAYED

       JUDGE NOT, that ye be not judged. For with what judgment ye judge, ye shall be judged: and with what measure ye mete, it shall be measured to you again.   I am quite sure that most of us are guilty of sometimes jumping blindly to judgment without really considering the unique juxtaposition of the person we are judging.  Buddha had proclaimed that before a judge be supposed to pronounce any judgment on an accused, he should make an earnest attempt to stand in the sandals of the defendant.  San Damiano is the name that I had given this bit of earth and the residence where I presently reside and would hope to spend whatever time I have left on this planet.  It is indeed a most stunning and beautiful home in a grand setting with views that some proclaim are “to die for.”  To the uninitiated and those whom have no idea as to the whole story behind this modest estate, San Damiano could be perceived as an ostentatious display of wealth.  I have often, in a modestly defensive manner, suggested that such a holding is only relative to some unseen bigger picture.  The home is certainly attractive and spacious, but if I were to tell you that it belonged to the Rockefellers, you would very likely judge the residence as something considerably below your instantaneous expectation considering their reputation for immense wealth.  I had once abandoned my beloved San Damiano and left for California because this house's outward physical appearance had too grossly overshadowed its actual and intended inner spiritual nature.  Even in this ferocious battle with the American Orchid Society the presence of this lovely home has been maliciously targeted by the Defense as physical evidence of a flagrantly negative and materialistic portraiture of its actually sensitive occupant.  Just to get the record straight, I had decided to take a brief pause from expounding the chronicle of the legal proceeding of this lawsuit and share the rest of the story of this San Damiano.  All of this, just to insure that the truth be known to all!  
     It was sometime around the end of the year of 1983 that I had had a call from a friend of mine who lived on the east side of the Sandia Mountains opposite Albuquerque, New Mexico.  This friend, Ken Stegemiller, was looking at some vacant land in a subdivision just south of where he was presently living.  Ken wanted me to take a look at this prospective piece of property and give him my professional opinion as to whether it might be a desirable location for a new residence for he and his partner.  On the next Monday morning I went to the real estate office of Dick Holben, the realtor who was in charge of the sales at that time.  I inquired as to the availability of a plat so that I could view this particular lot for my good friend.  While I had Dick’s attention I inquired whether there were any lots available in the range of five acres and he said that there was one lot that was about 4.6 acres located at the lower end of the subdivision.  Most of the available lots were about 2 acres on the average.  I proceeded to survey the lot my friend had inquired about and found it quite acceptable for his own intentions.  I’m sure that his principal concern had to do with the existing rough terrain, as this area is rather severe in places being in the immediate foothills of the Sandia Mountains.  
     I next visited the lot suggested by Dick as being close to five acres.  As soon as I had walked on the property I got the most unexpected chilling feeling that I was somehow walking on sacred ground and immediately proclaimed this bit of land as “a place of healing.”  I proceeded to the rear of the property and discovered the most majestic views that rather took me by surprised since this lot was not only at the end of the subdivision, but most notably at possibly its lowest of elevations.  I suspect that this exceptional location had been unintentionally overlooked because it wasn’t amongst those “top-of-the-pile” lots that occupied the highest elevations and that were situated along a rather dramatic ridge of brightly-colored lichen-infested rocks all of which have a rather spectacular view of the southern portion of the Sandia Mountains as well as an exceptional view of the Tijeras Canyon where Interstate 40 runs east and west and divides the Sandia Mountains from the Manzano Mountains.  As I continued exploring to the end of the property, as I could estimate it from the plat, I encountered a most interesting rock formation that was essentially flat on top and partially exposed from beneath.  It was larger than a standard-sized card table and had a distinctive indentation close to its center where I could easily ascertain that water had collected during periods of precipitation.  The instant feeling that I had was that this rock had probably been sat upon in the past, probably by a native American and had with little doubt been a place where deep contemplation had been repeatedly encountered.  I readily and without any cognitive thought or hesitation designated this rather unique site as “Meditation Rock.”  
     Returning from this lower portion of the land, I had the strangest thought that “I will never own this place, but I will certainly become its most consummate and constant caretaker.”  This whole experience was definitely mystical in nature and I had decided right then and there that I was going to be living on this sacred land for the rest of my life.  Just to confirm the veracity of these unanticipated feelings that I had experienced, I immediately called my niece, Julie Good, who had moved to Albuquerque to attend the University of New Mexico.  She inspected the property with me the very next day and warmly confirmed my unusual feelings about the spiritual nature of this land.  That Tuesday evening I approached Dick Holben with an offer that was some five thousand less than the asking price of that particular lot and got his firm assurance that the developers would not accept any offers below their established asking prices.  I instructed Dick to make the offer in any case and was confidant that if this land was truly to be part of my future, that they would accept the offer.  It was the very next day that Dick gave me a call and with a surprisingly astonished tone, informed me that the developers had indeed accepted my initial offer and did so without any hesitation.  Was I surprised?  We closed on the property that very Friday and the die was duly cast as to the intriguing future of San Damiano.  
     It was just a few years before the purchase of this land that a friend had brought a video movie to my apartment on Chelwood Park for our mutual viewing.  It was a film directed by Franco Zeffirelli entitled, Brother Sun, Sister Moon.  The film focused on the early years of Francis of Assisi, who sought communion with the natural world by renouncing his family’s riches to seek his own destiny unencumbered by material possessions.  Francis was, in a sense, history’s first “Drop-out”; he left a life of comfort to seek a spiritual union with the world.  It was somewhere in the middle of this film that some of Francis’ friends inquires as to where he had disappeared to following his untimely return from the Crusades and the answer given was, “San Damiano.”  This San Damiano was a church that had been abandoned and was in serious ruin.  San Damiano is the Italian name for Saint Damian, who along with his twin brother, Saint Cosmos, were both canonized as patron saints of physicians.  They had been crucified around the third century for having given away (in the spirit of Christian charity-agape) their medical services, which apparently offended the officials of the eastern Roman Empire.  I was so taken with the melodic sound of San Damiano that I instantly proclaimed at that moment that if I were ever to have a home of my own, it would be lovingly called San Damiano!  Little did I know at that time that the land I would eventually discover would in like manner impress me as “a place of healing.”  And so what was my vocation at the time I located this sacred ground?  I was volunteering as the first openly gay therapist at the Student Heath Services at the University of New Mexico.  
     For almost two years following the purchase, I meditated on this land, planted some fruit trees and tulip bulbs and just waited patiently for the land to speak to me and instructed me as to its particular needs.  I knew that when the time was right I would be inspired as to what kind of structure this land would dictate and support.  During the end of my short tenure with the University I had a week’s vacation, which I had planned on using to visit a good friend of mine that had recently moved to Colorado Springs, Farron Hurst.  We had met at the University of Oklahoma while we were both enrolled as doctoral students.  I had taken with me a pad of paper to scratch on should I have any ideas pop into my head about the future of San Damiano.  It was upon retiring the second night of my visit that I instantaneously set up in bed and within seconds roughed out the basic structural design that now exists and known as San Damiano.  I got up the next morning and cheerfully announced to Farron and his partner that I was immediately returning home to Albuquerque to see if this bit of instantaneous inspiration was going to actually fit and just where it would be situated on the bit of land that I had been meditating on for so many months.   I left Colorado Springs first thing that morning and drove straight to Cedar Crest and walked off my initial measurements.  It was almost perfect with one except; the proposed side entrance to the garages was an obvious impossibility since there was an estimated 23-foot drop in the land from the northwestern corner of the house to the southeastern corner.  These proposed garage entrances on the eastern side of the house would have required the construction of a bridge to be reach.  The rest of the proposed structure and internal designed remained entirely in tact as it had been so designed in those few seconds of pure inspiration.  
      Within just a few months I had located a draftsperson, Laura Sanchez of Las Lunas, New Mexico, to actually draw the working plans as I had too little time to do the details myself.  I had in the past drawn a number of residential plans for customers when I was active as a general contractor.  The kind lady that I had located was very excited about this unusual project and within just a few weeks I had the working drawings completed and was beginning to get excited about initiating the start of construction.  At just about this time I voluntarily departed my psychotherapy position with the University mostly due to some political matters that seemed less severe with the exciting prospects of San Damiano on the near horizon.  With the job out of the picture, I focused my attentions on the future of San Damiano.  The permit for the construction of the residence was for some 7200 square feet of roofed construction.  This sounded like a project that was far beyond my financial scope at that time, but I was quite confident that there was some good reason that the universe had handed me this unforeseen project.  
     
It was February 20, 1985 that I had obtained the County of Bernalillo building permit for this monumental project that I was about to undertake with the greatest of disguised confidence that I would somehow be able to eventually complete the project.  If someone had taken the time to seriously question me on just how I thought that I was going to be able to afford such an undertaking, I’m confident I would have simply said something in a rather confidant tone to the effect, “This project is simply meant to be....”  I have always maintained this rather adamant sentiment that if plans are thoughtfully laid out with the specific input and intentions of that invisible universe, the execution to fruition is an immutable given.  My mother had always proclaimed in the context of her own brand of Christian upbringing “The Lord will provide....”  I would possibly add to my mother’s contention that “the Lord helps those who helps themselves.”  I had usually achieved most anything that I had set my mind to and even though I didn’t have all the apparent financial means for such an extensive undertaking, I was confident that I could easily employ my own labor and skills to make up any differences.  
     
There was hardly any stage of this project that wasn’t accompanied by some significant degree of unsolicited abatement and this repeated as well as indispensable phenomena manifested itself from the very beginning with that considerably lower than originally established/fixed asking price for the land itself.  San Damiano today has that grand appearance and all those necessary amenities that would aptly qualify it as one of those featured homes in design magazine like Architectural Digest, except that the home wasn’t actually designed by an excessively expensive and certainly exclusive AIA-registered architect.  Even the physical placement of the residence on the property closely reflects a recognized Frank Lloyd Wright credo of creating a pleasingly and complimentary interplay between the environment and the actual structure.  The design is entirely unique unto itself.  For a lack of any specifically recognized scheme to the design I usually retort with the word “eclectic” when friends query as to its architectural theme.  It certainly reflects my own spiritual and personal nature of trust and openness to all peoples and ideas.  Most noticeable of the residence inner design features; there are intentionally no doors in the interior that would in any way interfere with the free flow of human activity except where absolutely necessary, as for example; the dark-room and the sauna for obvious reasons.  Most storage areas like-wise have the necessary closures simply to hide the usual clutter, as these rooms are not designed for human habitation!  I did intentionally added a door to one toilet-room in the guest powder room off of the main entrance to the residence for those rightfully sensitive day-guests that aren’t expected to share my own liberal degree of openness.  As to that poignant question of privacy, I consistently suggest and kindly offer to my visitors the repartee that “privacy, after all is said and done, is really just a matter of respect.”  On the more personal/romantic level I further suggest that, “I will never lock you out nor ever hope to lock you in.  You are free to come and go as you will....”  I point out to visitors that the intentional design of entries and hallways to those designated private areas provide what I consider to be more than sufficient privacy without those traditional placements of securable physical barriers—doors being the most noticeable implement of choice.  
     One of my mother’s three sisters, Vivian Little was my grand-patron aunt who lived in Washington, D.C. and who had a notable influence on my personal life as well as the physical existence of San Damiano.  Vivian had earned her Ph.D. from John Hopkins University in Baltimore in the area of romance languages and ended up working for the government cataloguing the contents of foreign medical journals for the Department of Health by writing (translating into English) synopsis of current medical-research articles.  In the late seventies I made two trips to D.C. to visit Vivian.  The occasion of the first trip was a heart attack that my aunt had suffered and it was on this trip that she had given to me, “for only my safe-keeping,” that most prized Persian rug in her collection.  It was from Qum, Iran and was, according to her, a museum quality wool and silk hunting scene about five by eight feet, roughly.  This rug’s primary colorization was a rich blue and its appropriately appointed placement in the dinning hall at San Damiano naturally dictated the use of blues in decorating the entire room.  The specially designed/crafted twelve-foot dinning table as well as the built-in buffet along one wall both have the same cobalt-blue ceramic tile inlaid and the upholstery on the dining chairs is a dark sky-blue.  I hardly ever enter this very special room without gazing at and marveling at the intricate beauty of this now hanging blue gem-of-a-rug at the head of the room.  This distinguished rug and certainly this dinning area as a whole with its aurora of blueness brings to mind warm thoughts of my loving aunt, Vivian.  
      On that second trip to D.C. my aunt insisted that I prepare her Last Will and Testament.  She had no carnal trust of lawyers and likewise didn’t want her estate to end up in the hands of civil authorities.  This Last Will and Testament that she had entrusted me to create for her ended up having a direct effect on the eventual outcome of San Damiano.  Besides the above-mentioned Persian hunting-scene rug, my aunt had acquired quite a collection of other quality Persian and Oriental rugs and at my unbiased suggestion, she left her rugs as well as the entirely of her modest estate to be divided equally amongst her five surviving heirs.  As fate would have it, she died in 1984.  So, with my share of her estate, I ended up with enough great-looking rugs to fill the entire house as well as a tidy sum of money to finish paying off the remaining cost of the lot as well as to finance some of the initial costs of the foundations.  
      The residence was constructed at just that precise period of time in our country’s history when both the Federal and even then the New Mexico State governments through tangible financial subsidies were strongly encouraging the use of solar alternatives to conventional power sources.  I had intentionally, and independent of any of these governmental encouragements, designed the home to be heated with the employment of solar resources.  In doing so, I serendipitously had the majority of the costs of installing the extensive mechanical equipment along with about a mile of ¾-inch copper tubing in the floors paid in large part by these generous governmental subsidies.   Even the engineering costs of this solar application became part of the subsidized project because the company that was ultimately engaged to do the installation offered the engineering as part of the total package.  So I was able to install a state-of-the-art heating system at a final cost that ended up being far less costly than a conventional force-air system.  A conventional heating system would have been eternally expensive just to operate and maintain considering the unusual size of the residence and the ever-rising costs of propane gas.  Many thanks are due to aunts as well as that sometimes-generous Uncle Sam!  
      It took over five months to bring the whole project to the stage where there was finally a concrete slab poured and readied for the conventional wood framing.  This unusual amount of time was rightfully due to a number of uncontrollable circumstances.  This particular spring was wetter than usual and it took almost a month just to have the septic tank properly installed after acquiring the necessary soil-percolation test results.  Because of the existing terrain and the necessity of the septic tank and drain fields being physically located behind the house, their installation and tractor/grading work had be completed prior to the construction of the house due to a problem of access were the house built.  The next expense of time was also due to the terrain where there existed that twenty-three foot drop in elevation from one corner of the house to its diagonal in the rear.  I didn’t wish to disturb my own bit of the mountain anymore than was necessary and in order to accommodate the elevations it was necessary to construct some of the stem walls of the foundation as much as ten feet high.  This also required a great deal of fill dirt to bring working levels up to grade.  At my constant insistence all of this massive construction took place in a manner that wouldn’t disturb any of the natural vegetation including the lichen-infested rocks that were everywhere to be avoided.  In the course of construction I only have to remove two indigenous trees by carefully placing the house in an area that was already mostly devoid of any native vegetation.  The various rocks that had occupied the immediate land where the house was to be constructed were gathered and placed in a pile until they were to be later incorporated into one of the residence’s three fireplaces.  
       The next consummate time-consumer was the solar floors of the house.  It was the specific design of the solar system that the floors of the house also serve as integrated sources of heat-storage.  This was accomplished be creating a foot of what is referred to as a ‘solar mass’ that was separated from the natural earth by a one-inch piece of rigid Styrofoam serving as an insulator/barrier to avoid any heat loss to the earth.  On top of this one-inch insulator were four to five inches of masonry sand and it was in this sand that the ¾-inch copper tubing was placed running back and forth across each of the eight heating zones with about twelve inches of spacing.  There was extensive care given to special sliver soldering since any of the copper joints were going to be permanently beneath a four to five-inch concrete slab.  Plumbers, by building codes, will never have a soldered joint beneath a slab, but the extensive tubing required in a solar floor makes it practically impossible to complete any of the given zones with even the longest lengths of flexible copper tubing that are commercially available.  Besides the careful placement and soldering of the copper, there is rigid testing for any possibly leaks that requires at least a week of keeping the tubing under pressure and maintaining a column of mercury at a prescribed level.  
       Besides all of this extensive copper tubing beneath the slabs, there is also the placement of the entire plumbing system and even a considerable amount of electrical conduit that was required to be placed before the slabs are finally poured.  By this time the lowest portion of the structure, the three-car garage and domestic quarters (endearingly referred to as “Consuela’s room”) are all completed with concrete filled cement blocks as the structural walls.  It was early fall before the framing of the main portion of the house finally began and the some fifty-two hundred square-feet of framing was completed in about five weeks under my sole direction of some four to five carpenter helpers.  For portions of the framing, I also had my nephew, Matthew Good, available for some of the more demanding jobs.  The most notable was the precarious overhead placement of sixteen-inch laminated beams from fourteen and seventeen feet above the floors of the grand room.  This was precisely the kind of dangerous work that I never wanted to ask just anybody to risk his or her necks.  Matt was quite adept to this kind of carpentry work as I was for the same reason that his father had gotten into the construction business as the result of my own father being professionally involved.  This all came natural to the both of us.  
     
For all those mechanical jobs that I was not licensed to perform, various contractors at a wholesale prices accomplished them because I was still a licensed general contractor for the State of New Mexico and still maintained my non-taxable status.  This all added up to enormous savings from of my own pocketbook and at the same time gave that false appearance that I must have had an endless supply of money to have accomplished this rather large undertaking.   It was during the start of the framing that I had been introduced to Terry Brown, a U. S. Navy buddy of one of my closest friends and ATΩ fraternity brothers.  Terry had recently moved to New Mexico from the D.C. area and the two of us thought we were going to become a permanent item.  As it turned out, Terry had brought with him considerable cash from the sale of his own home in D.C. and trusted our romantic situation enough to invest this money in San Damiano.  It was just enough to get the house to a state that we were able to safely occupy the major portions of the residence by the following spring even though all of the internal details of the house were not yet fully completed.  
       It took some five to six months for a single very craft-oriented mason working only one crew throughout those winter months to lay the some sixty thousand bricks that are now part of both the entire exterior and much of the interior.  It was an unusual winter in that most of the bad weather only occurred on the weekends, leaving the workdays fully available for the mason’s skilled hands.  Terry and I laid many of these 60,000 bricks as the finished flooring throughout the entire residence.  These interior brick pavers (about half the thickness of regular brick) as well as many full-sized bricks used in the flooring were part of that required ‘solar mass’ that was specifically designed to store the heat that was to be collected from the thirty-three Grumman solar collector units that were eventually placed on the flat portions of the residence’s finished roof.  
       Much of the exquisite appearance of the house is certainly due to the attention paid to the interior finishing touches.  The New England trained craftsman that provided the residence’s fine cabinetry was specifically recruited because the man was also skilled in the manufacture of custom furniture.  I had specifically designed that rather large dining area where I had hoped to have custom-crafted, a large twelve-foot table, specifically with none of those usual leaves to be inserted.  This was all for the making of a specific statement to those prospective twelve guests that I considered as an optimal-sized dinner party or an equally appropriate number for any special celebration.   I sometimes wonder if that number of twelve came from the mythological stories of Jesus and his twelve closest male followers?  I have already stated the rationale for the blue theme of the dining area; that very special hunting-scene Persian rug from Qum, Iran “entrusted to me” by my patron aunt Vivian.  
       In the dinning hall there are two large chandeliers that hang above that massive table.  Because of the ‘blue’ theme of the room, I wanted to have something that I considered was more esthetically compatible than the usual ‘brass’ and certainly not something too ornate/feminine as in the appearance of so many of the crystal offerings.  The majority of the lighting fixtures in the residence all came from the Georgia Lighting Company in Atlanta.  My father had done business with Harry Gillam for some number of years and I understand that when my father had constructed his own special residence that Harry had gifted him the lighting fixtures.  Well, I made a trip to Atlanta to shop at this very special locale that could often be seen advertising in Architectural Digest at that time.  Harry was almost equally generous with me and only charged me some twenty-five cents on the dollar for any of the fixtures that I selected.   When I expressed my very specific need for dinning chandeliers and specifically ‘two’ that matched, the kind lady that had assisted me showed me these very exceptional silver with gold trim items that were from Italy; she only had ‘two’ of them!  To this day, I have the distinct feeling that these entirely unique, made-to-order chandeliers were always destined to hang at San Damiano, another Italian original.  And like so much of the rich appearance of the residence to those who have no clue, I only had to spend pennies on the dollar.  
       When you first enter San Damiano from the main entrance, there are three recessed glass-covered cases opposite the doors.  One of these embedded cases; the largest one in the center contains a Bear Kachina carved and decorated in the Navajo style.  Shortly after I had moved into the home in the spring of 1986 I paid a visit to The Turquoise Lady, a shop in the Old Town of Albuquerque that specialized in the sale of Kachinas.  The proprietor of the shop was a very kind lady by the name of Cathren Harris.  I inquired of Cathren which of the Kachinas represented healing and she proceeded to instruct me that there were three that were each considered “healers”; the Badger, the Owl and the Bear.  I had decided that the Bear, known by its Indian name as the Hon, was my Kachina of choice and Cathren Harris suggested that I consider purchasing one that had been carved by a member of the Jemez Pueblo named Johnny Burgess.  She said that she had some examples of his work “upstairs” and proceeded to take me up these old stairs to what was sort of a storage room.  She actually had about six of these large, beautifully carved cottonwood Kachinas that were being held for a northern New Mexico rancher, Albert Mitchell, which had special ordered these Kachinas to be used as trophies at the New Mexico State Fair rodeo.  She cautiously added that it might be some time before Johnny Burgess was to be making any additional Kachinas, as he was currently quite preoccupied with the politics of the Jemez Pueblo.  In any case, I had decided then and there that this great-looking Bear Kachina was just what the Medicine Man of San Damiano had ordered and I prepared myself for the unspecified wait.  
       Several months passed and I received a call from Cathren Harris of The Turquoise Lady and she inquired as to whether I was still interested in purchasing the Bear Kachina by Johnny Burgess.  I said, “yes” immediately and headed for Old Town to give her a deposit until I could come up with the full purchase price.  When I arrived she proceeded to tell me the rest of the story.  It seems that shortly after she had initially shown me those Kachinas that had been sold to Albert Mitchell there was a tragic turn of events.  Mr. Mitchell and one of his sons were flying down to Albuquerque in their private airplane when it crashed, killing both of them.  Cathren waited for what she had considered a respectable period to time of about three or four months, and when there was no effort to pick up the order, she decided to go ahead and let me have that original Bear Kachina that I first inspected in that upstairs storage room.  I thanked Cathren Harris for having remembered that I had specifically wanted to acquire the Bear and gave her my modest deposit with the stated assurance that I would have the remainder in very short order.  
       It was within a week that I had gathered the remainder due on the Bear Kachina and headed for Old Town.  When I entered the shop she told me that Albert Mitchell’s wife had actually showed up in the meantime and picked up that initial order.  Cathren said that she had explained that she had no idea that the order was to ever be honored and took it upon herself to sell one of the Kachinas to a gentleman that was particularly interested in having a Bear Kachina carved by Johnny Burgess.  The kind wife gave her approval and said that it was no problem; that she was only honoring her husband’s prior commitments and that the rodeo for which the Kachinas were intended had long since passed.  I later learned that the wife had died of cancer about six months after her husband.  The very strange circumstances surrounding my ultimate acquisition of one of Johnny Burgess’ Bear Kachinas gave me serious pause and it all reconfirmed for me that San Damiano was indeed “a mystical place of healing” that had a mind and direction of its own, and I was only the “caretaker.”  
       It was at least two years later that I finally turned my attention to finishing the library.  It was the only room remaining in the central portion of the residence that was unfinished and still showing its bare studs and exposed wiring.  It required three weeks of rather intense concentration for my nephew, Matthew, and me to custom design and complete the oak-finished interior.  The entire room including its vaulted ceiling is custom-paneled and trimmed in solid red oak, and with the exceptions of the arched entrance, one modest-sized window and seat opening to the north and the door to the dark room, the entire library is imbued with repeated sections of built-in shelving.  Two-thirds of the shelving is oak-finished to house books and the remaining is tempered-glass shelving with glass doors designed to protect the shell collection that I have acquired over the years since I was only four and living on gold coast of Florida.   I have endearingly designated this very specially appointed room as my “Old English” library because of its intrinsically warm feeling, oak finish and the two very special English hunting-horns chandeliers that are also from the Georgia Lighting Company.  Each section of shelving has its own recessed lighting that is controlled by a master dimmer switch.  It is this one singular area of the entire residence that I warmly consider as my own, private space that is exclusively mine.  This is where my trusty computer resides and where I am able to think and create whatever is put to paper these trying days.  Many visitors often select this particular room as their favorite.  Again, the appearance is sheer opulence to the uninitiated; to me it was simply a time-honored labor of love and a creative use of affordable oak-veneered paneling trimmed with solid red oak that was aesthetically enhanced by endless hours of the tedious employment of an ordinary Sears Craftsman’s router giving texture to every exposed corner.  Add to this unique woodwork a lot of sanding and the proper applications of deep-toned walnut stains and you have another room that screams of pure unadulterated luxury.  The appearance is unquestionable and the truth of the matter, is that its actual costs are probably little more than what anyone else may have forked-out for only four painted walls of an ordinary room.  
       It seems that I am giving a blow-by-blow description of San Damiano and my only intention is to sort of relate that the appearance of things can be necessarily deceptive without the full knowledge of the unseen circumstances.   I can rap this thing up with a quick over-view of the remainder of the house.  The grand room is over one thousand square-feet with an eighteen-foot vaulted ceiling in the center portion where the brick masonry fireplace takes advantage of this added height.  It is in this area that I often decorate a fifteen to seventeen-foot Christmas tree.  There is a parlor sized Knabe grand piano at one end of this room and all of this adds up to another one of those appearances of grand things.  The height of this room is due in large part to that enormous drop in the land’s elevation and this necessarily ‘sunken’ room simply takes advantage of what nature had already over-generously provided.  The guestroom’s most obvious feature is a Kiva fireplace in one of its corners and along with its custom-made southwest furniture and Pueblo Indian artifacts, the room is specifically designed to give the overnight visitor the distinct idea that they have spent the night in this magic Land of Enchantment.  Another taste of elegance that defies it appearance!  
       Next to the guestroom and separated by a bathroom suite with sauna is a fully equipped gym.  It is sad to say that this mirrored gym, equipped with a five station Marcy piece of workout equipment that was well intended just doesn’t get the workout that it rightly deserves.  From that point you take a couple steps down along with a couple of turns in the hallway into the master suite where all of those collected lichen-encrusted rocks I mentioned before have been laid into a two-sided fireplace.  The other side of this fireplace is where the Jacuzzi is located in a separate sunroom off of the master suite.  Everything about the master suite speaks of ‘two.’  This is the area of the residence that is certainly my own private space and at the same time it was obviously designed to accommodate two individuals.  The vanity has two sink, the large shower designed for two-at-a-time has two shower-heads, and the walk-in closet is divided equally with matching cabinetry and two oriental garden seats for putting on shoes.  As I write this, half of the closet remains empty, waiting for some special occupant.  This past summer I re-tiled that shower and incorporated nine custom ceramic tile orchids into the floor.  I hand crafted and fired the orchid tiles myself and modeled them after some of my awarded orchids.  Off the master suite is a private deck that has a grand view of the Tijeras Canyon and the southern end of the Sandia Mountains.  You can reach this redwood deck that candelabras slightly out over a modest cliff by traversing a barely elevated redwood boardwalk.  I specifically designed and constructed this raised boardwalk to keep visitors to San Damiano from trampling what I endearingly and often refer to as “Mother Nature’s million-dollar landscape job.”  There is no way to adequately describe the endless beauty of the colorful lichens that encrust the boulders along with the various cacti and yuccas that mysteriously grow in the cracks of the cliff and throughout the landscape.  The rest of the indigenous vegetation is an interesting mix of scrub oak, mountain mahogany, western junipers and piñon pine trees.  
       Shortly after I had finished this residence my mother called me from Houston, Texas where she was visiting.  She had just purchased two used Mercedes, one diesel and the other gasoline.  She would never own a foreign car herself, but she asked that I come retrieve these two cars.  She requested that I drive them both for a while and decide which of them that I wanted to keep and then sell the other.  Her more than generous and certainly amusing reasoning for this unexpected purchase; “Every grand home should have at least one Mercedes parked in front!”  Even my own sainted mother had so interestingly attested to the ostentatious outward appearance of my most beloved and certainly cherished San Damiano.  
      This very distinguished San Damiano has been both a blessing and at times sort of a curse.  It’s unique and at the same time deceptive appearance, which has only been improved over the years, once sent me off to California to die.  I felt so oppressed and too often misjudged by so many people that only saw me as that rich “lord of the manor,” and gave me far too little credit for the incredibly loving person that I am known as by others.  I didn’t want to depart this earth and have this misconception as my only epitaph.  It was on this perceived final destination of life to Mendocino, California that I had met John Howell.  In the last twelve years that he has been part of this intriguing San Damiano, his artistry and decorating skills finished off the final touches to this elegant home and now we give guided tours to all the visitors.  In this same twelve-year period with John, I also added those two greenhouses in the rear of the house, a koi pond and with John’s added touch of a grass lawn; I now often refer to San Damiano as “an estate.”  Last year I even added another of those unfinished boardwalks all the way down to that very mystical and spiritual place that I initially christened as, “Meditation Rock.”  
       So much for the physical appearance of things!  I sometimes feel equally burdened with my intellect and certainly the number of college degrees that I have earned.  But even more than the education I have received over the years, I have been duly blessed with an exceptional mind that has that unique ability to retain the essence of so much of what I have learned.  And at the same time I have often been accused of having that abstruse and intensely innate ability to synthesize otherwise unrelated information.  Some may wish to see this as some kind of profound confusion; I often see myself as having opened that verboten Pandora’s box or maybe I just too enthusiastically devoured that forbidden fruit from that Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil.  In either case, I have never hesitated questioning the status quo of any subject matter and often offend those who too easily continue to naïvely gobble up the multitude of false mythologies and beliefs.  I have too little tolerance of those who refuse to deal with palpable truths that are all too well grounded in reality; call it science if you must.  And it is not only the physical sciences that are often serendipitously denied their proper and full acknowledgment, the innate metaphysical nature of man is equally ignored much too often in favor of some diss-empowering religious belief or doctrine.  
        I frequently sense that I am thoughtlessly labeled as that egotistical type probably because I dare to postulate ideologies that fly squarely in the face of conventional wisdom, and I certainly do so with such a commanding sense of reality and a conspicuous air of absolute authority.  I have a recondite confidence about my own given ability to accurately discern the obvious truths of our existence all of which was probably inadvertently due to an extraordinary gift of self-empowerment that was lovingly bestowed on me by my own mother.  My mother when I was about twelve years old sat me down one day and thoughtfully explained, “I have not had you baptized because I have always wanted you to chose your own faith.”  Coming from the daughter of a Church of God lay-minister, I would say that her behavior was rather liberal.  The tangible message that this more than thoughtful and empowering pronouncement had for me was that I had the innate ability to think for myself and to not be inordinately pigeonholed by some external ideology that may have had no recognizable semblance to reality as part of my own grand view of the universe.  Of course, all of this didn’t really occur to me at that given moment; it did firmly set the groundwork for my own style of self-actualization and my life-long mind-set of viewing this world through my own eyes.  The other subtle lesson that this timely scenario with my mother had so intuitively taught me was my unblemished respect for every other individual’s immutable right to think for himself or herself.  Until some people really get to know me well, they often get the miscalculated impression that I am rather dogmatic and opinionated.  That stoic confidence that I so easily display in expressing my own perspective of the world is often too hastily taken as an aggressive tactic in some covert attempt to alter their own set of cherished and often excessively protected beliefs.  I am most adamant about the abstruse notion that it has been the truth that has set me free from the overly oppressive bondage of so many falsely postulated doctrines.  And I am admittedly too ardent at times and don’t always make it equally clear that it is my zealous position on that specific freedom of individual thought that is far more important to me than anyone viewing the world with my own set of personal values.  I just don’t believe that most individuals take the time to ever seriously question what they have been fed so serendipitously and simply chose to remain in that perceived safety zone that I often refer to as “blissful ignorance.”  Keep in mind that slaves don’t labor for themselves; likewise, those of us that are enslaved to other’s contrived doctrines and beliefs don’t have to think for ourselves.  That revered Freedom Seeker and consummate rebel-rouser of some two thousand years ago suggested that we employ our minds as well as our hearts when worshiping/loving our gods.  Historically, the church has always labeled those who dared to think for themselves as heretics and too often simply eliminated them all together.   It seems that our human race has inadvertently become a flock of weak-sheep that have simply adopted a state of ideological complacency as an inevitable and certainly indispensable survival tactic.  How dare I suggest that you think for yourself!  And even worse, how terribly arrogant and egotistical it is for Joe Walker to elucidate as a given fact that most established Christian churches as well as other world religions are full of that proverbial dogmatic shit.  
      Another illusory appearance of things that inadvertently betrayed the reality of my actual emotional condition was my relationship with John Howell.  On the surface I am sure that it appeared that we were intimate lovers when in fact our loving relationship had justly evolved into an unusual friendship of mutual convenience.  At the time when John and I had initially connected, I had no idea that I was going to be living more than a few additional years and truly felt that John would make a great companion for those final days.  We were intimate lovers at the onset of our relationship and when that phase had passed all too quickly, there was so much mutual compatibility established that we simply continued our relationship with separate bedrooms.  Many observers would simply assume that we must have had an “open” relationship since either of us may on rare occasions dated other men.  In that state of mind believing that I didn’t have long to live, I just didn’t have any great desire or motivation to seek another partner.  And, when all that shit finally hit that proverbial fan in the American Orchid Society my energies got entirely focused on the conflict.  It seemed to me at that time that the appearance of a stable home-life would be more favorable to my lawsuit and neither John nor I had any reason to do anything else.  The truth of the matter; this external appearance of our private lives being something that it wasn’t in actuality was just another major contributor to the broader fantasy that Humpty-Dumpty was a whole and happy guy prior to the disaster.  But once again, what may seem so apparent based on the outward appearance of things, may unjustly betray the reality of a totally devastated and hopeless-feeling human being.  I had so little desire to live and with the lack of any binding personal relationships remaining in my life, it was only that altruistic drive to deal with that hideous and oppressive bigotry still so prevalent in our society that actually kept me alive.  I really wish that John had been more than just the friend that he had become because there were too many of those lonely nights when I really needed someone just to hold me and help fight those haunting daemons that were relentlessly tempting me with the contemplation of suicide.  
        When you live in grand house, have a Mercedes, as old as it was, parked in the front and display a happy external demeanor, I guess it would be safe to assume that one might be perceived as being somewhat rich or at least enriched.  So terribly far from the truth!  I had for two many years been living with a negative cash flow believing that I wasn’t going to be around to have to pay the damn bills.  I finally put a first mortgage on San Damiano in 1997 to catch up and the added mortgage payment only made things worse in the long run.  I am so attached to San Damiano in an emotional sense that I just can’t bring myself to sell the property in order to rearrange my finances into a more survivable and economical reality.  In the spring of 2001 I even went so far as to investigate the idea of filing bankruptcy.  A plausible idea for some, but I only discovered that I had too much equity remaining in my home that was still on public record as being mine even though I had earnestly executed a deed over to my sister many years ago, again, thinking that I was going to die.  The one realistic and viable possibility that I had once seriously considered was establishing an orchid business with my friend Diann, but the unhealthy and dire situation that arose within the American Orchid Society applied the most thwarting skids imaginable to that idea.  
        The spring had become so dire for my personal finances that I sort of declared my own style of bankruptcy.  I simply ceased paying my credit card bills and this cessation was particularly inspired by a letter that I had received from one of my credit card creditors.  I guess that despite the fact that I had always paid my bills for the amounts due and often a little bit more to get them paid down more quickly, this particularly company had decided to increase my APR to such a ridiculous rate.  What was most disturbing about their reasoning was that it “appeared” according to their reporting agency that I was getting in over my head.  It was actually true, but instead of helping the situation, the policy was to make it even more difficult for me to ever bail out of debt.  Just hit the hell out of a man when he’s already down for the count.  Can you believe twenty-eight percent (28%) and just at the time when interest rates were actually decreasing in the country?  This following letter eased any conscience I might have had about taking these calamitous financial matters into my own hands.

       people’s  bank  
       C O N N E C T I C U T

     Joseph L/Dr Walker            181           March 27, 2001  
     PO Box  XXXX                                     Re: Your account ending in 3333  
     Cedar Crest NM  87XXX-XXXX

Dear Joseph L/Dr Walker,

After careful consideration, we find it necessary to increase the Annual Percentage Rates (APRs) on your People’s Bank credit card account. This change will take effect on May 19, 2001.*  Your APRs will increase to 27.99% APR (corresponding daily periodic rate of 0.07668%). These APRs will be in effect for all existing and new purchases, balance transfers, cash advances and default pricing. All other rates, benefits and fees will remain the same as disclosed in your credit card agreement, which is amended from time to time.

Recently, we reviewed how our customers are managing their credit accounts with others and us. We used a scoring system that assigns a numerical value to the various items of credit bureau information we consider. Our experience has shown that this score is an indicator of an individual’s likelihood to make payments on time. The main reasons you did not score well are:

  The total balances on your bank credit cards and lines of credit are high when compared to the total amount of credit available to you on those accounts.  

  You have a large number of credit card accounts, including bankcard and retail accounts, and other credit lines, with balances exceeding 50% of their credit limits.

  The total balances on your installment loans are relatively high compared to the original amount borrowed.

Our credit decision was based in part on information obtained from Equifax Credit Information Services. They supplied information, but had no part in our decision and will be unable to answer any questions regarding why we took this action. Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act you have a right to know the information contained in your credit file at Equifax Credit information Services. You also have a right to a free copy of your report from them, if you request it no later than 60 days after you receive this notice. In addition, if you find that any information contained in the report you receive is inaccurate or incomplete, you have the right to dispute the matter with them.

Equifax Credit Information Services  
P.O. Box 740241  
Atlanta, GA 30374  
1-800-685-1111 (touch tone option #1)

If you would like to contact us please write to us at P.O. Box 7092, Bridgeport, CT 06601 or call us at (203) 338-2700, 8:00 a.m. through 12:00 midnight ET, Monday through Friday.

Sincerely,  
     
Mark K Vitelli  
Mark K. Vitelli  
Executive Vice President

*If you request your billing date to be changed between March 2001 and May 2001, the date that your APRs increase may be earlier or later in May 2001 than stated in this letter.

The Federal Equal Credit Opportunity Act prohibits creditors from discriminating against credit applicants on the basis of race, color, religion, national origin, sex, marital status, age (provided that the applicant has the capacity to enter into a binding contract); because all or part of the applicant’s income derives from any public assistance program; or because the applicant has in good faith exercised any right under the Consumer Credit Protection Act. The Federal Agency that administers compliance with this law is the FDLC, 15 Braintree Hill

Office Park, Braintree, MA 02184.

        I realized that I was about to totally destroy my once impeccable credit, but I decided that the credit ratings could go down the tubes in favor of my attempting some sane manner of surviving.  The one piece of property that I wanted to be sure was totally protected was my San Damiano.  During the first weeks of May, I executed a rather hefty mortgage to my sister so that any would-be creditors would have to stand in a long line should they attempt to fiscally encumber my home.  This was just sort of a housecleaning measure, a belated followed-up to my initial intentions of having San Damiano in my sister’s name in the event of any untimely death.  Considering that suicidal ideations continually plague my thoughts, it was an appropriate step to take in any case.  I had also taken similar legal steps to protect my half-interest in those apartments that I already shared with my sister.  The idea of having no future credit at that time was rather comforting for me since it would definitely stop me from getting in any deeper.  The night of the day that I filed all my papers at the county clerk’s office was actually the first night that I really had any good sleep in too many years.  
          I could have possibly avoided these financial circumstance had I simply followed the repeated advise of so many concerned individual suggesting that I go onto SSI disability.  In my recent attempts to find love on the web through an HIV/AIDS network, I met so many other men who had taken advantage of their disability entitlements and most of them were receiving somewhere around a thousand dollars a month.  Had I taken advantage of the program, I would have probably avoided the financial disaster.  There were two governing factors that prevented me from seeking these benefits.  First was that stubborn pride of not being seen as being on welfare and secondly, I wasn’t sure that I had ever had a sufficient number of ¼‘s of employment since so much of my working life has been some form of self-employment that didn’t require any payment into Social Security Insurance program.  I even spent my first year at the University of New Mexico as a volunteer when I first began my psychotherapy practice.  Even after that first year I was only paid part-time despite the fact that I worked full-time and carried the largest caseload of any of the full-time therapists.  One of the reasons that I had left was that they had hired a full-time therapist and still wanted me to continue working full-time at that half rate.  It was their idea that I was rich and could afford continuing to give away my time.  I quit!  Little did I know just how I had been cheated for having the appearance of being rich?  As fate would have it I received unsolicited my Social Security Statement that was dated April, 16, 2001 and sure enough, it doesn’t appear that I worked enough years in which I had paid into my account.  According to their figures I have only earned 17 of the required 37 credits needed to qualify for disability.  Oh well, I guess my creditors will have to pick up the difference.  And according to the Statement, I would have to work at least another five years to actually qualify for any benefits.  I’m not sure that I could hold up under any amount of added stress at this time.  
     I would consider reentering the work force except that I am too overwhelmed with the idea of having to confront the prejudice against not only my health situation, but being in my late fifties.  I had had several bad experiences looking for employment in California when I was only in my forties.  And now ten years later and no current work history for over fifteen years, I am mentally paralyzed and mortified at the unlikely prospect of finding any meaningful work that would pay for those HIV/AIDS medications required just to remain alive for a few more years.  The prospect of reentering the work force after the unexpected success of the AIDS cocktail of medications became a problem with many infected individuals, but add to the complicated mix my advanced age and it engenders a feeling of utter hopelessness.  No wonder I have been so suicidal in these recent years.  
     The most damaging of all results of this whole damn state of affairs with the American Orchid Society is where it has left me with my once well-held fascination with and the love of growing orchids.  Nearly everyone that I now encounter so sympathetically and sincerely, but all too naïvely suggests, “Why don’t you just get back into your orchids and enjoy them?”  I was finally able to verbally express the peculiar emotional dilemma in which I had found myself so precariously placed.  I can best express it with the use of an analogy; I feel like that consummate Shakespearean actor who has achieved a enviable reputation as one of the best stage actors to ever perform and suddenly has been totally banned from ever performing on the London stage and Broadway as well.  Try and tell this great actor that he can still act, but that his next engagement will be in Paducah, Mississippi at the Barn Theatre.  He is fifty-eight years old and isn’t at all very excited about the prospects of creating a new career.  Get the point?  So I have turned my attentions to writing about this rather intriguing dilemma just to illustrate for others the total devastation that can be so unjustly wrought from the unchecked and malicious actions of an educated, medical doctor, Tulsa, Oklahoma, south Texas-trained professed Christian BIGOT.  Fortunately I’m no teenager that is likely to take his own life just to escape the unexplained oppressive feelings that one is apt to experience at the hands of a Bible-belt bigot; I have had those very thoughts and have had the good fortune of having a loving foundation that has kept my head just barely above water.  
      The betrayal of appearances isn’t just those indicatives on my part; the American Orchid Society made it a poignant point to demonstrate that they exercised no prejudices on their part.  The first thing that they did was to establish a non-discrimination policy that they published only after I had made such a stink.  They had survived for more than seventy-five years without a written policy, which a direct violation of federal law.  As Lee Cooke had once expressed it, “We don’t need a policy because we don’t have a problem.  After all, we have even had a gay president of the AOS in the past!”  As though that fact might inexplicitly excuse them from their egregious misconduct in the present!  Of course, this line of dim-witted reasoning has absolutely nothing to do with their covert sanctioning of the malicious violations of my privacy surrounding my HIV/AIDS status.  They also stood behind the fact that they had awarded me so many awards, which should clearly indicate that they exercised no prejudice.  Of course, the awards were actually given to my orchids that were supposed to have been judged anonymously; were they?  And once again, we are not addressing the actual cause for my legal actions against the AOS.  If there had been some form of physical injury, one could have had a clear ‘visible’ take on the matter; with the injury being to my psyche as a result of their flagrant violation of my privacy, there was simply no apparent ‘visible’ evidence of damages.  And they found themselves in a predicament because they couldn’t even apologize without inadvertently subjecting themselves to the legal liability that had been created by some of their own members.  They managed to keep the appearance of decent propriety by simply ignoring my accusations as being totally unfounded.  Off the record, there were certainly many who had conceded to my countless injuries.  
      The most profound betrayal of appearance was the Defense lawyers’ rather successful portrayal of Joe Walker as being the mean-spirited bastard himself that had intentionally created this entire fowl-smelling quagmire.  Of course, it is the prostitution of the truth for which defense lawyers are paid such exquisite fees and it became obvious from the very beginning that Shannon Pardon and her law firm were amongst the very best of legal prostitutes available for only thirty pieces of tarnished silver.  Shannon lied upon lie and so intentionally distorted the truth, and to add even further insult to injury her legal pimps even employed a prostitute of a psychologist to “professionally” declare that I was the unbalanced party in the situation and that my feigned suffering was more aptly due to an “open and unsatisfying sexual relationship” with my domestic partner coupled with an enormously “over-inflated ego.”  These pimps and prostitutes even went so far as to solicit damaging fabrications from those who had once been considered friends.  Of course, these weak-ass bastards were willing victims of deception considering that they had been shrewdly courted by the AOS.  I guess you could add that they were all consummate prostitutes in their own rights.  In fact, one of them, Carl Siegler actually took money.  Loyalty and integrity is too easily sold to the highest bidder.   And the worst part of it all, and so maliciously intended, was the contrived appearance that Joe Walker must have been the very one in the wrong since so many of his once good ‘friends’ so eagerly took sides against his position.  Oh, were there to be no more Judas-type individuals ever born to this already too-terribly corrupt world that we all have to share!  
      The deception of appearances was part and partial of some of those ex-friends Defense witnesses.  My character was certainly called into play, but I didn’t play that game as the Plaintiff.  For the record, I first met Ray Gabaldon while he was still involved with his male-lover.  Ray would be working in Nevada for the week and returning to Albuquerque often on Thursday nights to spend with his lover and then report home to his wife and two daughters Friday night or Saturday morning as though he had only just returned from Nevada.  When he had become involved in the AOS student-judging program, he sometimes made his appearance at monthly judgings with his wife in tow.  What a hypocrite!  As for Carl Siegler, he had a fascination with oriental women and for the longest time maintained a sexual relationship with a married Asian woman.  I never held any bad judgments for either of these men, but after all that I had so generously contributed to their own situations, I was taken back by their blatant disloyalty.  The very worst part of their ugly demeanor was their own ingenious display of righteous indignation at what I was sincerely attempting to accomplish within the AOS.
      My own written words were constantly used to betray me, but to achieve that premeditated devious end those words had to be taken out of their original context.  Lee Cooke employed that very tactic when he covertly offered that infamous “anonymous” letter to the already feeble-minded Paul Bechtel to be read to the Judging Committee in Toronto.  That letter was no more than the calculated compilation of my own mean spirited words that were used only to describe the actions, behaviors and personal characteristics of those who had so maliciously attacked me.  “Sticks and stones will break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”  Bullshit!  That had to have been serendipitously and thoughtlessly suggested by some terribly naïve idiot that has never had any legitimate emotional development.  I emotionally healthy individual experiences the full range of emotions; it is impossible to develop a full appreciation for the state of love without experiencing the opposite.  When you shut down your ability to experience either end of the spectrum, you run the serious risk of not experiencing true emotion at either extreme.  This is the reason so many individuals fail to ever really experience love to any true degree.  It was only recently that I once again proposed to the universe “Why me?”  Why am I experiencing such dire circumstance not only with the AOS but with my own personal situations surrounding my finances, and now that I going to actually live longer, a healthy romantic life?  It certainly wasn’t God’s voice, but the unquestionable idea entered my head, “The greater the Ying, the greater Yang.”  Just another interpretation of that forbidden fruit from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil!  No one witnessed my ever eating that enriched fruit and there is certainly nothing different about my outward appearance that would indicate in any way that I had any actual knowledge of reality.  I guess it is only by the fruits of their labor that we actually come to know them and not by the possibly intentional deceptive appearance of wolves in the skins of slaughtered sheep.

 


           
SOLICITATIONS

     Ask, and it shall be given you; seek, and ye shall find; …. I'm not convinced that in this present world this profound and well-intended idiom, probably given in some assurance of discovering the truth, is always applicable in an environment where truth itself seems such a rare and illusive commodity. The greed-fed prostituted Defense sought every bit of information about me that could only be employed to discredit not only my good character but to distract from the noble cause to which this whole case was dedicated. That enigmatic expression, "the best defense that money can buy" was most relevantly applied throughout this entire case. One of the most disgusting items for which the Defense must have employed either wire-tapping or surveillance in order to obtain the information was evidenced in the following action received by Mr. Romo April 12:

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

J. LAMAH, an anonymous
individual living with
HIV positive status,
                            Plaintiff,
v.

JOHN KRAMER, M.D., et al.,                                                                             NO. CIV 98-1403 BB/KBM
                            Defendants.

AOS’s FIRST REQUEST
FOR ADMISSIONS TO PLAINTIFF

      Defendant American Orchid Society (AOS), by and through its attorneys of record, Madison, Harbour, Mroz & Brennan, P.A., pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 36, propounds the following Requests for Admissions to plaintiff. In accordance with Rule 36, please admit or deny the following requests within 30 days from service of these requests. Pursuant to SCRA 1-036, any requests that you have not properly admitted or denied within 30 days after service shall be deemed admitted.

            1.        Admit that you engage in sexual relations approximately once a month with a married man other than John Howell.

          RESPONSE:

                                                                    MADISON,HARBOUR,MROZ & BRENNAN, P.A.

                                                                           By:               SPard--                     
                                                
Shannon A. Parden
                                                                                  Post Office Box 25467
                                                                                  Albuquerque, New Mexico 87125-5467
                                                                                  (505)
242-2177 - Telephone
                                                                                  (505) 242-7184 - Facsimile
                                                                                  Attorneys for Defendants Kramer, Schroeder, & AOS

         I was so disgusted with this obvious bit of dirty assault tactics on my good character.  This private matter that had absolutely nothing to do with the case at hand and was obviously employed to intimidate my position.  The gentleman that they refer to is a friend of long standing and who, for his own psychological/sexual and most private reasons does visit my home some three to four times a year (sometimes I don’t see this man for as much as a year).  John Howell and I have both been intrigued with this man's hit-and-run manner, which both of us agree appears much like the adolescent behavior of some naive boy scout.  The whole affair is a very private matter and I was most insulted that the prostitutional Defense would risk exposing this innocent man in the name of their depraved and perverted manner of defense.  Of course, I rightly denied their statement since there was a gross error in their over-calculation of the frequency of these intimate encounters with the "married man."  I chose to place this particular item at the head of this chapter even though its actual chronology is a little out of synch because it so dramatically demonstrates the Defense's malicious solicitation of facts that aren't at all relevant to the case.  My most private sexual behavior is of no valid excuse for the malicious discrimination and the abhorrent behavior of too many members of the American Orchid Society.  And the most relevant fact of all is that during this period of time that this “married man” was making his visits, there was no acts of infidelity on the parts of either John or myself since our actual relationship was no more than good friends that lived in the same home.  Because I wasn’t dating and making no attempts at forming a new relationship, this man was my only sexual contact and for those of you who wonder; yes, there was only the practice of safe sex.  The fact of the manner is that the relationship was so mild there was no need for condoms—if you get my point.  And any further explanation is absolutely none of your business.

April 4, 2000

Re- J. Lamah v. Kramer, et al.

Dear Mr. Romo:

As you are aware, defendants believe there are significant problems with plaintiff's case against these defendants.  First, Kramer and Thompson have pending motions to dismiss this case due to lack of personal jurisdiction.  Based upon plaintiff's testimony, I believe there is a high probability that the Court will grant these motions.  Additionally, based upon what die Court stated in its September, 1999 hearing, defendants plan to file a motion to dismiss the AOS for lack of personal jurisdiction.  We also believe there is a high probability that the Court will grant that motion.  Defendants have numerous pending dispositive, motions, and intend to file more dispositive motions on the merits of this case.  Again, defendants believe, there is a very high probability that the Court will find that there was no defamation.  Additionally, as plaintiff had told approximately a dozen people of Ms health condition prior to any purported disclosures by these defendants, we believe the Court will rule similarly on the invasion of privacy claims.  Plaintiff has already conceded the ADA claims; we believe the Court will find that any other purported claims of discrimination are barred by the exclusivity of the remedy of the ADA.

In regards to damages, plaintiff's expert reports are clearly speculative, which will be demonstrated by defendant's experts.  We believe that pursuant to a Daubert motion, the Court will preclude plaintiff's expert testimony.  Finally, various witnesses, including but not limited to Lee McAnena and Karl Siegler, will testify, in substance, that plaintiff specifically stated he had no intent to ever run an orchid business for profit.  Finally, we anticipate that Dr. Roll's testimony will minimize any purported emotional damages by plaintiff.

In summary, liability is questionable and damages are speculative, We believe that Judge Molzen will point these facts out to plaintiff at the settlement conference.  However, in an attempt to resolve this matter prior to such time, defendants hereby extend an offer of $17,500 to plaintiff, which offer is open up to and through the settlement conference of May 8, 2000.

  I look forward to hearing from you after you convey this offer to your client.

                                                            Sincerely yours,  
                                                                             
SPard  
                                                                        Shannon A. Parden  

Shannon A. Parden

  April 4, 2000

Via Facsimile #555-1313 only  
Shannon Parden, Esq.  

Re: Lamah v. Kramer, et al.

Dear Ms. Parden:

Thank you for your two letters of this morning.  I am forwarding the settlement offer letter to Mr. Walker.  My sense, however, is that there is no need to be delaying or canceling anything based on the amount of Defendants' offer.  As to the other matters:

1.      I have requested that Mr. Werther make himself available at his office on April 19, 2000 at 9:00 a.m. Passover begins at sundown and this should allow us to wrap up the deposition before.  I have asked Mr. Werther to bill you directly for all his time associated with his deposition.

2.      We are checking with Dr. Koster's office.  I will ask Dr. Koster's office to bill you directly for any charges pertaining to his deposition.

3.      I am happy to enlarge the time for Defendant's to respond to discovery propunded by Plaintiff so long as we have until April 18, 2000 to serve any response briefs that are due to you.  I have been sidelined with other things and cannot make it by April 10th.  In addition, we will respond to Defendant's latest RFP by April 27, 2000.  If you need time beyond April 27, 2000 let me know.

4.      Can' I notice Mr. Lee Cooke for Monday, May 15, 2000 for his deposition at the AOS offices?

5.      The plaintiff and Mr. Foster will be present with me at Ms. McAnena's deposition tomorrow afternoon

I will arrive a few minutes early tomorrow afternoon to discuss any issues pertaining to the above.  I am out of pocket on other things the remainder of today.

I look forward to seeing you tomorrow afternoon.

     Anthony  Lawrence  Romo  
Anthony Lawrence Romo  
For the Firm

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

   
J. LAMAH, an anonymous  
individual living with  
HIV positive status,  
                                Plaintiff,  

                   v.                                NO. CIV 98-1403 BB/KBM

 JOHN KRAMER, M.D.,  
JEAN SCHRODER, MAX C.  
THOMPSON, Individually, and  
in their respective capacities  
as agents or employees of  
THE American Orchid Society,  
and THE American Orchid Society,  
a Not-For-Profit Corporation,  
                               Defendants.

PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSED MOTION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT  
AND FOR EXPEDITED HEARING THEREON

                COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned counsel, and moves the Court for leave to amend his Complaint in accordance with F.R.C.P. 15(a) by filing the First Amended Complaint attached to this motion as Exhibit A.  Plaintiff further respectfully requests expedited hearing of this motion.  As grounds for his motion, Plaintiff states as follows.

1.         Plaintiff filed his complaint initiating this cause of action on November 13, 1998 (the “Pending Complaint”).  
      2.         Plaintiff brought his cause of action pro se.  
      3.         Plaintiff engaged counsel during the time that his Pending Complaint was being drafted.  Upon information and belief, Albert W. Schimmel, Esq. and Jody Neal-Post, Esq. declined to file a complaint on behalf of the Plaintiff after having assisted with the drafting of a substantial portion of a draft of a complaint.  Plaintiff also had the assistance of Judith Finfrock, Esq. during the time that his Pending Complaint was being drafted.  
      4.         Notwithstanding the assistance of the above-identified counsel in some form or fashion in the preparation and filing of the Pending Complaint, a review of the Pending Complaint reflects that it represents Plaintiff’s perception and conception of the events leading to his claims rather than a statement of the facts and circumstances concerning conduct actionable under the Law.   
      5.         The organizational structure of the complaint is wanting and impedes and impairs judicial efficiency and economy and indeed the prospects for justice itself.  The complaint contains 136 paragraphs in no particular order, multiple theories are advanced collectively within the same count, the conduct of multiple defendants actionable under different legal theories is addressed in single counts and the legal theory applicable to any given count is not readily discernible.  
      6.         The Pending Complaint suffers from certain substantive deficiencies.  The most prominent example is that it advances claims grounded in the Americans With Disabilities Act when there was an utter absence of compliance with the requirement to exhaust administrative remedies.  
      7.         The preceding are indicia that Plaintiff did not have the assistance of counsel in any meaningful way.  Regardless of the involvement of counsel, the Pending Complaint can only be characterized as pro se in the form in which it was ultimately filed.  What led to this outcome would be utter conjecture.  Plaintiff’s counsel in no way intends to infer any blame to or wrongdoing by anyone.  The point is that the Pending Complaint is not an effective mechanism for an adjudication of the issues inherent in this cause of action.  
      8.         Since approximately November of 1999, Plaintiff’s current counsel has been working to evaluate the facts, read a considerable number of documents including two books in which Plaintiff has recounted the events pertaining to his claims, working to gain an understanding of how it is that the American Orchid Society functions and interacts with affiliated societies, working to grasp the premises on which the Pending Complaint was based, evaluating the extent to which the facts and the Law support or fail to support the premises on which the Pending Complaint is based, and evaluating the evidence and Law that support the legal theories of the Pending Complaint.  
     9.         The fact that this process has consumed five months is not dilatory under the circumstances of this cause of action.  As a practical matter, Defendants’ counsel have had one year more than Plaintiff’s current counsel to become versed in the facts and legal premises germane to this cause of action.  
    10.      Nor has the process stated in paragraph 8 above been static.  Indeed the process has been evolutionary.  In part, the process has been shaped by written discovery, motions practice and depositions.
    11.      In February of 2000, counsel for the Defendants deposed Plaintiff for four days.  The questions asked and the answers given at the deposition confirmed that the filing of an amended complaint will serve the interests of judicial economy, judicial efficiency and justice.   
    12.      On March 10, 2000 counsel for Plaintiff served Defendants’ counsel with a copy of a proposed form of First Amended Complaint seeking concurrence of Defendants counsel.  At a March 17, 2000 conference to discuss logistics matters between counsel for Plaintiff and Defendants’ counsel Shannon A. Parden, Esq., Ms. Parden observed she did not believe that personal jurisdiction over individual Defendants Thompson and Kramer would be sustainable based on the proposed form of First Amended Complaint.  In response to this observation the premises for naming Defendants Thompson and Kramer were evaluated yet again and they were dropped as named defendants.  
    13.      Additional factual analysis, legal research and three depositions, one of which was taken within the last five days, resulted in the proposed form of First Amended Complaint that is attached to this Motion as exhibit A.  
    14.      Since the filing of the Pending Complaint in November of 1998, three of the original defendants have been dismissed and Plaintiff’s current counsel agrees that the Law requires the dismissal of the Americans With Disabilities Act based claims for Plaintiff’s failure to exhaust administrative remedies.  Therefore, the Pending Complaint contains a good deal of material not related to the present Defendants and the proper causes of action.  In addition, eliminating Dr. Kramer and Mr. Thompson as named individual defendants will create yet further confusion unless the form of First Amended Complaint is filed.  
    15.      Defendants have indicated that they intend to invoke the statements of the Court at a September 27, 1999 hearing to again contest this Court’s jurisdiction over the American Orchid Society.  The First Amended Complaint establishes that this Court has jurisdiction over the American Orchid Society.  
    16.      The filing of a First Amended Complaint will not prejudice the Defendants.  Rather, Defendants would be able to present their challenges and defenses to the Plaintiff’s actual claims under the Law in a more focused manner. 
    17.      The Pending Complaint is based on legal theories including invasion of privacy, defamation, and intentional infliction of emotional distress against certain individual defendants.  In addition, Plaintiff’s Pending Complaint alleges negligent supervision and training against the American Orchid Society and liability of that entity under agency law theories as well as the inherent notion that the American Orchid Society did not fulfill certain contractual obligations to the Plaintiff.  
     18.      The proposed form of First Amended Complaint attached as Exhibit A: dismisses Defendant John Kramer, M.D. individually in acknowledgment of the fact that this Court under a reasonable construction of applicable facts and the Law does not have personal jurisdiction over Dr. Kramer; dismisses Defendant Max C. Thompson individually in acknowledgment of the fact that this Court under a reasonable construction of applicable facts and the Law does not have personal jurisdiction over Mr. Thompson; and removes any notion that certain claims in whole or in part are based on the provisions of the Americans With Disabilities Act.  
      19.      The First Amended Complaint retains in a materially more discernible form the counts based in defamation, invasion of privacy, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent supervision.  The First Amended Complaint makes discernible Plaintiff’s claims based on intentional and tortuous breach of contract and raises new counts based in prima facie tort, a theory of recovery offered in the alternative to other stated theories grounded in intentional tort.  
      20.      The First Amended Complaint is based on the same facts as those in the Pending Complaint.  The legal theories of the First Amended Complaint are also found in the Pending Complaint either explicitly or implicitly.   
      21.      Defendants have had every opportunity to conduct expansive discovery, including written discovery and a four-day deposition of Plaintiff, as to those facts and theories.  Further, Defendants were on notice at the time of Plaintiff’s deposition that Plaintiff was asserting claims of prima facie tort.  
      22.      To ensure that the filing of the First Amended Complaint does not prejudice Defendants, Plaintiff is agreeable to enlarging discovery by the Defendants through and including August 31, 2000.  
      23.      Defendants have already raised in their filings in this cause of action that they believe they will be prejudiced by the impact of amendment upon their currently pending motions.  See Reply To Plaintiff’s Response In Opposition To AOS’s And Kramer’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Or, Alternatively, For Partial Summary Judgment On Counts VIII, XIV, And XV.  The impact of the First Amended Complaint on the currently pending motions will be as follows.

A.      American Orchid Society’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings On The Grounds The Applicable Statute of Limitations Has Run.

Impact of First Amended Complaint:  The First Amended Complaint renders this motion moot because the causes for which dismissal is sought have been dropped. 

B.  American Orchid Society’s and Kramer’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Or, Alternatively For Partial Summary Judgment On Counts VIII, XIV, and XV. 

Impact of First Amended Complaint: The First Amended Complaint purges the Americans With Disabilities Act-based claims from Plaintiff’s cause of action and also purges any invasion of privacy claims based on the actions of John Kramer, M.D.  The First Amended Complaint also clarifies the intentional infliction of emotional distress claims and the negligence claim against the American Orchid Society.  The First Amended Complaint also helps to clear up what have led to Defendants’ misapprehension as to the factual basis for the negligence claim against the American Orchid Society.

C.       American Orchid Society’s And Schroder’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Re Defamation Claims And Count XIII And For Partial Summary Judgment On Count IX And Related Part Of Count XIII.

Impact of First Amended Complaint:  In this motion, movants assert that Plaintiff has failed to delineate with sufficient specificity the defamatory acts against Plaintiff done by each of Defendant Schroder, Ms. Anita Aldrich, Ms. Lois Dauelsberg and Mr. Paul Bechtel.  The First Amended Complaint purges any notion of a defamation claim against Ms. Anita Aldrich and against Ms. Lois Dauelsberg.  The First Amended Complaint makes evident that the defamation claim against the American Orchid Society is based on the actions of Mr. Paul Bechtel under the doctrine of respondeat superior.  The First Amended Complaint specifies the factual basis for the defamation claim against Ms. Jean Schroder. 

D.  Defendants’ Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Or, Alternatively, For Partial Summary Judgment On Claims For Breach Of Physician’s Duty of Confidentiality

Impact of First Amended Complaint:  The proposed form of First Amended Complaint renders this motion moot.

E.        Motion To Strike Affidavit Of Joseph Walker, Jr., Ph.D. Attached To (1) Plaintiff’s Response In Opposition To AOS’s Motion For Judgment On the Pleadings On The Grounds The Applicable Statute Of Limitations Has Run And (2) To Plaintiff’s Response In Opposition To AOS’s And Schroder’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings Re Defamation Claims And Count XIII And For Partial Summary Judgment On Count IX And Related Part of Count XIII (Filed pursuant To D.N.M.LR-Civ. 7.3(5) On 2/14/00.

Impact of First Amended Complaint:  The First Amended Complaint does not impact this rather curious motion except to the extent that it may serve to render portions of Mr. Walker’s affidavit not germane to the issues inherent in the proposed form of First Amended Complaint.

F.        Defendant Thompson’s Motion For Summary Judgment For Lack of Personal Jurisdiction.

Impact of First Amended Complaint:  The First Amended Complaint renders this motion moot.

G.       Defendant Kramer’s Motion For Summary Judgment For Lack Of Personal Jurisdiction.

Impact of First Amended Complaint:  The First Amended Complaint renders this motion moot.

24.                The interests of justice would be served by the filing of the First Amended Complaint.  

25.                Defendants do not concur in this motion.

26.                The proposed form of First Amended Complaint is attached to this motion as Exhibit A.

27.                A memorandum in support of the Motion is being served with this motion.

28.                Plaintiff respectfully requests an expedited hearing on this motion.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully moves the Court to enter an Order permitting the Plaintiff to file the form of First Amended Complaint attached to this motion as Exhibit A.  Plaintiff further respectfully requests that the Court hear this motion on an expedited basis.

                                   Respectfully Submitted,  
                            ROMO & ASSOCIATES  
                            A Professional Corporation

                                                                By                                                            
                                                                    Anthony Lawrence Romo

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT  
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

J. LAMAH, an anonymous  
individual living with 
HIV positive status,  
                                Plaintiff,

vi.                              NO. CIV 98-1403 BB/KBM

JOHN KRAMER, M.D.,  
JEAN SCHRODER, MAX C.  
THOMPSON, Individually, and  
in their respective capacities  
as agents or employees of  
THE American Orchid Society,  
and THE American Orchid Society,  
a Not-For-Profit Corporation,

                                Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN SUPPORT OF  
PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSED MOTION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT

                COMES NOW the Plaintiff, by and through his undersigned counsel, and submits this memorandum of law in support of his motion to the Court pursuant to F.R.C.P. 15(a) for leave to supplant his currently pending complaint with the form of First Amended Complaint attached as exhibit A to his Plaintiff’s Opposed Motion To File First Amended Complaint (hereinafter “Plaintiff’s Motion”).

                Leave to amend the Complaint is within the discretion of the trial court, Lange v. Cigna Individual Financial Services Co., 759 F.Supp. 764, 759 (Kan. 1991), and, in the words of F.R.C.P. 15(a), leave to amend “shall be freely given.”  The United States Supreme Court, in Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182, 83 S.Ct. 227, 230, 9 L.Ed. 2d 222 (1962), has indicated that the provision ‘leave shall be freely given’ is a “mandate…to be heeded.”  The facts and circumstances stated in Plaintiff’s Motion auger heavily for amendment inasmuch as amendment will advance judicial economy and efficiency and is in the interests of justice.

                “Generally, refusing leave to amend is only justified upon a showing of undue delay, bad faith, or undue prejudice to the opposing party.”  Childers v. Independent School District No. 1, 676 F.2d 1338, 1343 (10th Cir. 1982).  Plaintiff’s Motion represents neither undue delay nor bad faith.  See Plaintiff’s Motion at paragraphs 8, 9 and 10.  Plaintiff’s Motion does not unduly prejudice Defendants.  See Plaintiff’s Motion at paragraphs 11, 16, 20, 21 and 22.

                The proposed First Amended Complaint is a reformulation of Plaintiff’s fundamental claims.  As further discussed in Plaintiff’s Motion the underlying facts and legal theories with regard to which the Defendants have had an opportunity to conduct discovery are unchanged.

     Indeed, in the instant case there are significant procedural benefits to Defendants in the filing of the proposed Amended Complaint in that extraneous material, relating to the dismissed individual Defendants and the to be dismissed Americans With Disabilities based cause, is absent.  In addition, the remaining causes of action, all of which are explicit or implicit in the pending Complaint, are organized and presented in a more coherent manner.  This will allow the claims to be examined in the discipline of motion practice such as the additional dispositive motions that Defendants have stated that they intend to file.

                “The principal factors which are considered in connection with the offer of an amendment are, first, whether it will cause delay and, second, whether the adversary will suffer prejudice.  Lateness does not of itself justify the denial of the amendment.”  R.E.B. Inc. v. Ralston Purina Co., 525 F.2d 749, 751 (10th Cir, 1975).  As such the fact that there was a seventeen-month lapse between the filing of the pro se complaint and the motion seeking amendment does not militate against amendment.         

“The party opposing the amendment of the pleadings has the burden of showing prejudice.”  Beeck v. Aquaslide ‘N’ Dive Corp., 562 F.2d 537, 540 (8th Cir. 1977).  Prejudice under Rule 15 “means undue difficulty in prosecuting [or defending] a lawsuit as a result of a change of tactics or theories on the part of the other party.”  Deakyne v. Commissioners of Lewes, 416 F.2d 290, 300 (3rd Cir. 1969).  Notwithstanding the fact that the facts and theories upon which the proposed form of First Amended Complaint rests are the same as those underlying the pro se complaint, to ensure that Defendants are not prejudiced by amendment, Plaintiff will also stipulate to allowing Defendants to conduct discovery through and including August 31, 2000.

CONCLUSION

                The Court’s granting the Plaintiff leave to amend is in the interests of all of the parties.  Indeed, even the Defendants have lamented the difficulty of coping with the unmanageable structure of the pending pro se complaint.  (e.g. “What is clear, however, is that plaintiff has heaped all his claims into a morass, so that one claim is indistinguishable from another, in his attempt to squeeze his stale claims into viable causes of action.  This is simply not a basis for stating a claim under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, federal law, or New Mexico law.”  AOS’s Reply To Plaintiff’s Response In Opposition To AOS’s Motion For Judgment On The Pleadings On The Grounds The Applicable Statute Of Limitations Has Run, page 2, paragraph 2).

                For the reasons stated in Plaintiff’s Motion and this memorandum, Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant his request to file the form of First Amended Complaint that is attached as Exhibit A to Plaintiff’s Motion.

                                                        Respectfully Submitted,  
                                                             ROMO & ASSOCIATES
                                                             A Professional Corporation  

                                                          By                                                                            
                                                              Anthony Lawrence Romo  
                                                              Post Office Box 4729  
                                                              Albuquerque, NM  87196-4729  
                                                              (505) 766-9155

                                                                                Attorneys for Plaintiff       

 

The undersigned hereby certifies that he caused  
a copy of the foregoing Memorandum  
of Law In Support Of Plaintiff’s Opposed  
Motion To File First Amended Complaint to be  
served by hand delivery upon:

Shannon A. Parden, Esq.  etc.

 

 

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO

JOSEPH L. WALKER, JR., Ph.D.,  
                                           Plaintiff,  
v.                                                                             NO. CIV. 98-1403 BB/KBM

JEAN SCHRODER, individually,  
the AMERICAN ORCHID SOCIETY,  
a Not-For-Profit Corporation, and  
John Doe, the author of the Anonymous Letter,  
                                          Defendants.

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES FOR
INTENTIONAL AND TORTIOUS BREACH OF CONTRACT,  
DEFAMATION, INVASION OF PRIVACY,
INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS,  
NEGLIGENT SUPERVISION AND PRIMA FACIE TORT

Jurisdiction

1.       Federal Jurisdiction is based on diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1332.

2.       Plaintiff Joseph L. Walker, Jr., Ph.D. (hereinafter “Mr. Walker”) is, and at all times pertinent to this cause of action was, a citizen of the State of New Mexico.

3.       Defendant Jean Schroder (hereinafter “Ms. Schroder”) is, and at all times pertinent to this cause of action was, a resident of the City of Salt Lake City, County of Salt Lake, and a citizen of the State of Utah.

4.       Ms. Schroder committed a tort against Mr. Walker, a citizen of the State of New Mexico.  Ms. Schroder is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court.

5.       Defendant the American Orchid Society is a Not-For-Profit Corporation incorporated under the laws of the State of New York (hereinafter “the American Orchid Society”).

6.       The American Orchid Society has availed itself of the protection of the laws of the State of New Mexico by, without limitation:

A.      maintaining a web site through which it solicits memberships from citizens of New Mexico;

B.      advertising products in New Mexico;

C.      soliciting business in New Mexico;

D.      participating in trade shows (orchid shows) conducted in New Mexico;

E.       publishing photographs of orchids grown by citizens of New Mexico;

F.       engaging in a nationwide sales or distribution scheme that includes New Mexico;

G.      purposefully causing products to be shipped to New Mexico; and

H.      entering into contracts with citizens of New Mexico.

7.       At all times pertinent to this cause of action, the contacts between the American Orchid Society and the State of New Mexico were continuous and systematic.  The contacts place the American Orchid Society within the general jurisdiction of this Court.  This Court has personal jurisdiction over the American Orchid Society.

8.       The American Orchid Society enjoys tax-exempt status by virtue of its status a 501 ( c ) (3) organization under the Internal Revenue Code.

9.       Defendant John Doe, the author of the Anonymous Letter, is named as a Defendant fictitiously as, upon information and belief, he or she is a joint tortfeasor or otherwise responsible for Plaintiff’s damages.  Defendant, the American Orchid Society has failed and refused to reveal of the identity of John Doe.  Mr. Walker will request leave to amend this Complaint as to John Doe at the time that the American Orchid Society reveals the true identity of John Doe.

10.    John Doe committed a tort against Mr. Walker, a citizen of the State of New Mexico.  John Doe is subject to the jurisdiction of this Court.

11.    The matters in controversy between Mr. Walker and Ms. Schroder exceed, exclusive of costs and interest, the sum of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00).

12.    The matters in controversy between Mr. Walker and The American Orchid Society exceed, exclusive of costs and interest, the sum of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00).

13.    The matters in controversy between Mr. Walker and John Doe exceed, exclusive of costs and interest, the sum of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000.00).

 

General Allegations

14.    Mr. Walker started growing orchids in 1952 at the age of ten.

15.    By the 1960s the American Orchid Society had an established presence in New Mexico through its sanctioning of an affiliated society named the New Mexico Orchid Society.  As an affiliated society, a minimum of twenty-five percent (25%) of the members of the New Mexico Orchid Society must be members of the American Orchid Society.

16.    On October 5, 1973, Mrs. William “Peg” O’Neill of Albuquerque, New Mexico became an American Orchid Society accredited judge.  Ms. O’Neill later became a Vice-President of the American Orchid Society.

17.    On April 16, 1982, the Trustees of the American Orchid Society held their biannual meeting at the Classic Hotel in Albuquerque, New Mexico.

18.    In April of 1982, the Southwest Regional Orchid Growers Association held an orchid show in Albuquerque, New Mexico.  Accredited judges of the American Orchid Society judged the show.

19.    In the summer of 1983, Mr. Walker bought property in Cedar Crest, New Mexico that he named San Damiano.  It is on this property that Mr. Walker established his orchid operation.

20.    In the 1980s the American Orchid Society expanded its presence in New Mexico through its sanctioning of another affiliated society, the Escalante Orchid Society.  The Escalante Orchid Society primarily served the New Mexico counties of Santa Fe and Los Alamos.  For affiliated societies a minimum of twenty-five percent (25%) of each Society must be members of the American Orchid Society.

21.    During 1986, Mr. Walker tested positive for human immunodeficiency virus (hereinafter “HIV”).

22.    Believing that he had no more than three or four years of life remaining as a result of testing positive for HIV, Mr. Walker decided to live those three or four years involved in an activity that would be meaningful to him, the growing of orchids.

23.    In 1988, Mr. Walker turned a room next to the kitchen of his house into a greenhouse for the growing of orchids.

24.    In 1989, Mr. Walker met a woman by the name of Diann O’Neill who was a member of the American Orchid Society (hereinafter “Ms. O’Neill”).  Ms. O’Neill is the daughter-in-law of the late Mrs. William “Peg” O’Neill.

25.    In 1991, Mr. Walker began hybridizing orchids.  It normally takes three to six years before such hybridized plants are suitable for sale to the public.

26.    Mr. Walker has been a member of the American Orchid Society since at least 1991.

27.    Ms. O’Neill and Mr. Walker began traveling to events commonly referred to as “orchid shows.”  Ms. O’Neill and Mr. Walker typically presented a display at each of the orchid shows that they attended.

28.    In addition to the time associated with traveling to and from an orchid show, it may take two to three hours to set up the physical display and five to twelve hours to arrange the plants in the display, depending on how many plants are being presented.

29.    The American Orchid Society’s system of judging has been developed over the course of sixty-five years to grant recognition to new and superior forms of orchid species and improved forms of orchid hybrids.

30.    The American Orchid Society has established twenty-one (21) judging committees and twenty-seven (27) judging centers and supplemental centers in furtherance of the American Orchid Society’s system of judging.

31.    The Handbook on Judging and Exhibition governs the American Orchid Society system of judging.  Section 1.1 of the Handbook, titled Introduction, states, “Part I of this Handbook on Judging and Exhibition outlines the rules for AOS judging whether conducted at judging centers established in various parts of the United States or at shows held in this country, or under certain limitations, abroad.  The rules herein are firm and are to be followed in all AOS judging activity and in the administration of the judging system.”

32.    In May of 1991, Mr. Bill Hayward, an American Orchid Society accredited judge and Chairman of the Rocky Mountain Regional Center, stated to Mr. Walker and others, “I’m the one who helped clean up the gay mess in Tulsa, Oklahoma.”  Mr. Walker is a homosexual.

33.    On November 8, 1991, after completing an application and being interviewed, Mr. Walker was admitted as an American Orchid Society student judge with the Rocky Mountain Regional Center.  Ms. O’Neill was also admitted as a student judge with the Rocky Mountain Regional Center. 

34.    From the start, Mr. Walker and Ms. O’Neill encountered resistance from Ms. Lois Dauelsberg (hereinafter “Ms. Dauelsberg”).  Ms. Dauelsberg is an American Orchid Society accredited judge and a member of the Escalante Orchid Society.

35.    Upon information and belief, at a 1992 biannual meeting of the Trustees of the American Orchid Society held in Boston, Massachusetts, Ms. Dauelsberg stated to American Orchid Society accredited judges and student judges that Ms. O’Neill had had to leave New Mexico and move to Texas because she had mishandled funds belonging to the New Mexico Orchid Society.  This statement was untrue.

36.    On November 24, 1992, at the suggestion of Mr. Bill Hayward, Chairman of the Rocky Mountain Judging Center, Mr. Walker requested a leave of absence from the Rocky Mountain Regional Center.  On December 12, 1992, Mr. Walker’s American Orchid Society student judge status with the Rocky Mountain Regional Center was terminated by the Center.

37.    In 1992, Mr. Walker, having decided that he would like to go into the business of selling orchids, built a freestanding greenhouse on his property.

38.    On April 18 and 19, 1992, the New Mexico Orchid Society held an orchid show at the Albuquerque Garden Center.  This orchid show was sanctioned by the American Orchid Society and judged by accredited judges of the American Orchid Society.

39.    During 1992, Mr. Walker won the following AOS Show Awards at orchid shows he attended:  Houston Orchid Society, ODC Show Trophy, Best Group; New Mexico Orchid Society, AOS Show Trophy, ODC Show Trophy, Best Group, Best Flower, Best Grown; Kansas Orchid Society, AOS Show Trophy, ODC Show Trophy, Best Group, Best Flower (3), Best Grown (3); Oklahoma Orchid Society, AOS Show Trophy, ODC Show Trophy, Best Group, Best Grown (3), and Best Flower.

40.    During 1992 there were exchanges of correspondence between Mr. Walker and agents or officials of the American Orchid Society on at least the following dates: November 13, 1992, November 24, 1992, and November 24, 1992.  The exchanges pertained to Mr. Walker’s concerns as to activities within the American Orchid Society, including the conduct of American Orchid Society accredited judges.

41.    On February 10, 1993, Mr. Walker registered his business, San Damiano Orchids, with the Taxation and Revenue Department of the State of New Mexico as a sole proprietorship.  Mr. Walker anticipated at the time that the business would consist primarily of mail order sales of orchids.

42.    In 1993, Mr. Walker registered with the New Mexico agricultural authorities and had his greenhouses inspected.

43.    On March 4, 1993, Mr. Walker prepared an application seeking to become an American Orchid Society student judge in the Great Plains Judging Center.

44.    On April 9 through 11, 1993, the New Mexico Orchid Society held an orchid show at the Albuquerque Garden Center.  This orchid show was sanctioned by the American Orchid Society and judged by accredited judges of the American Orchid Society.

45.    On June 19, 1993, Mr. Walker’s application to become an American Orchid Society student judge was accepted by the Great Plains Judging Center.

46.    During 1993, Mr. Walker’s orchid plants won sixteen (16) American Orchid Society awards.

47.    During 1993, Mr. Walker won the following American Orchid Society Show Awards at orchid shows he attended: Alamo Orchid Society [San Antonio, Texas], AOS Show Trophy, Best Group; Best Grown, Best Flower, Best Mexican Species; Tulsa Orchid Society, AOS Show Trophy, ODC Show Trophy, Best Grown, Best Flower; New Mexico Orchid Society, AOS Show Trophy, ODC Show Trophy, Best Group, Best Grown, Best Flower (2); Heart of Texas [Austin, Texas], AOS Show Trophy, ODC Show Trophy, Best Display, Best Grown (5), Best Flower; Oklahoma Orchid Society, AOS Show Trophy, Oklahoma Orchid Society Special Award, Best Group, Best Flower (4), and Best Grown (2).

48.    Upon information and belief, in October of 1993, the American Orchid Society refused to hold a biannual meeting of the Trustees of the American Orchid Society because ‘a homosexual was running the board’ of the New Mexico Orchid Society (Mr. Walker).

49.    On December 17, 1993, Mr. Walker resigned as a student judge with the Great Plains Judging Center because of the actions and failures to act of agents of the American Orchid Society, including, without limitation, the failure to deal with the fact that Mr. Walker was suffering at the hands of agents and officials of the American Orchid Society.  Mr. Walker’s resignation was accepted in January of 1994.

50.    During 1993 there were exchanges of correspondence between Mr. Walker and agents or officials of the American Orchid Society on at least the following dates: January 2, 1993, January 25, 1993, January 26, 1993, November 27, 1993, and December 17, 1993.  The exchanges pertained to Mr. Walker’s concerns as to activities within the American Orchid Society including the conduct of certain of the American Orchid Society accredited judges.

51.    In 1994, Mr. Walker built a second greenhouse and dismantled the greenhouse in his residence.

52.    During 1994, Mr. Walker’s orchid plants won six (6) American Orchid Society Awards.

53.    During this period, Mr. Walker began to compile books and publications relating to orchids that came to comprise the San Damiano library consisting of approximately two hundred (200) volumes.

54.    During the 1990s the American Orchid Society further expanded its presence in New Mexico by sanctioning two more affiliated societies, Zia Orchid Growers and the Las Cruces Orchid Society.  Mr. Walker is a founding member of Zia Orchid Growers.  A minimum of twenty-five percent (25%) of an affiliated society must be members of the American Orchid Society.

55.    During 1994 there were exchanges of correspondence between Mr. Walker and agents or officials of the American Orchid Society on at least the following dates: January 9, 1994, January 26, 1994, January 26, 1994, August 19, 1994, September 19, 1994, September 20, 1994, October 4, 1994, and November 22, 1994.  The exchanges pertained to Mr. Walker’s concerns as to activities with the American Orchid Society including the conduct of certain American Orchid Society accredited judges.

56.    In late 1995, Mr. Walker learned that he had acquired immune disorder syndrome (hereinafter “AIDS”).  Mr. Walker’s physician characterized Mr. Walker’s condition as “full blown AIDS”.

57.    During 1995, Mr. Walker’s orchid plants won four (4) American Orchid Society Awards.

58.    In the April 1995 issue of the American Orchid Society Bulletin OrchidMania, a nonprofit California corporation, published a “Thank You” for those who were instrumental in raising over $30,000 for seven AIDS relief organizations in the United States, Asia and Latin America.

59.    Upon information and belief, the American Orchid Society received complaints about its publication of the OrchidMania announcement because it pertained to AIDS.  The American Orchid Society capitulated to these complaints from American Orchid Society members by refusing to publish any paid advertisements referring to OrchidMania AIDS fundraising activities in American Orchid Society publications.

60.    The lack of coverage of OrchidMania AIDS fundraising activities persisted from the 1995 publication through the date of the filing of this cause of action.

61.    In 2000, the American Orchid Society Web site’s lead article pertained to OrchidMania.

62.    In January of 1996, Mr. Walker’s physician, Dr. Fred Koster, prevailed upon Mr. Walker to begin a multi-drug treatment regimen called “the Cocktail”, which had recently been approved by the Food and Drug Administration.

63.    Mr. Walker responded favorably to the Cocktail regimen and could now look forward to living considerably longer than he ever hoped since being diagnosed HIV positive in 1986.

64.    Mr. Walker determined to continue to direct his energies, the time he had remaining and his focus in life to the orchid business.

65.    In 1996, Mr. Walker drove to San Antonio, Texas to meet with Ms. Anita Aldrich, the Chairman of the American Orchid Society Committee on Judging and immediately thereafter drove to Tulsa, Oklahoma, to meet with Dr. John Kramer, the Chairman of the Great Plains Judging Center, to discuss his concerns and seek each of their assistance, only to be rebuffed by these American Orchid Society officials.

66.    Notwithstanding the conduct of these American Orchid Society officials, Mr. Walker requested that he be re-admitted as an American Orchid Society student judge of the Great Plains Judging Center, by letter dated August 16, 1996.

67.    In November of 1996, Mr. Walker made a presentation at the biannual meeting of the Trustees of the American Orchid Society held in Baltimore, Maryland.  At the November 1996 business meeting of the Great Plains Judging Center, Mr. Walker was reinstated as a student judge of the Great Plains Judging Center.

68.    During 1996, Mr. Walker’s orchid plants won eleven (11) American Orchid Society Awards.

69.    During 1996 there were exchanges of correspondence between Mr. Walker and agents or officials of the American Orchid Society on at least the following dates: August 6, 1996, August 14, 1996, August 16, 1996, September 10, 1996, September 23, 1996, October 1, 1996 (Peter R. Furniss), October 1, 1996 (Roger A. Brown), October 2, 1996, October 3, 1996, October 9, 1996, October 11, 1996, October 21, 1996, October 23, 1996, November 1, 1996, December 9, 1996 and December 27, 1996.  The exchanges pertained to Mr. Walker’s concerns as to the activities within the American Orchid Society, including the conduct of certain American Orchid Society accredited judges.

70.    In January of 1997, the American Orchid Society published a statement of nondiscrimination policy for the first time in the organization’s history.  Later, Lee S. Cooke, the Executive Director of the American Orchid Society, told Mr. Walker that attorneys had been retained in response to Mr. Walker’s statements of concern and they had admonished the American Orchid Society for its failure to adopt a non-discrimination policy.

71.    On October 17, 1997, the accredited judges of the Great Plains Judging Center voted to elevate Mr. Walker from American Orchid Society student judge status to probationary judge status.