A  LETTER  FOR  DOCTOR,  PhD

    

  CLYTA FOSTER HARRIS

     wpe23.jpg (4149 bytes)

  FROM JESUS

 

 

RETURN TO

  
 

uestions for

   esus  
    wpe6.jpg (3275 bytes)nterview esus  

 

  THE QUESTION:  There was no question here!  It was  simply a request in which Jesus said he want me to write a letter to Clyde Harris, again an exceptionally good friend of mine.  

 

Home Page

Question One

Question Two

Question Three

Question Four

Question Five

Question Six

Question Seven

Question Eight

Question Nine

Question Ten

Question Eleven

Question Twelve

Question Thirteen

Question Fourteen

Question Fifteen

Question Sixteen

Question Seventeen

Question Eighteen

Question Nineteen

Question Twenty

Question Twenty-one

Question Twenty-two

Question Twenty-three

Question Twenty-four

Question Twenty-five

Question Twenty-six

Question Twenty-seven

Question Twenty-eight

Question Twenty-nine

Question Thirty

Question Thirty-one

Question Thirty-two
 

Question Thirty-three

  

 

  THE LETTER:  Clyta,    I'm quite confident you will find this rather strange.  So my good friend, and indeed you are a very good friend of mine at this given moment in time.  You may not know this but Lamah from the very moment that he met you, he knew just how much you loved me;  that was what had attracted him to you.  Believe this to be the truth; Lamah is the only man I've ever talked with in this particular fashion since my death in Alexandria in Egypt.  The only reason I consented to exchange ideas with Lamah is very simply because he loves me for exactly who and what I am, or should I say what I'm not.  I had explained my divinity or lack thereof in the above interview.  Clyta, I would have addressed you personally, but you don't know me as a man and this yells me that you probably don't possess any genetic memory as does Lamah and furthermore I believe that you would likely tell people that you talked with Jesus and of course that Jesus you would have been talking with and who had been explained to you was a god; and that imaginary exchange would have only confused you further in your great  and loving faith.  Joe, his name as you know him, would have preferred if I had not asked him to write this letter to you as he does not want to possibly add to the confusion about who I really am, any further.  Also understand, that in many ways I only exist in Lamah's mind or as he prefers to call these streams of dialogue as coming from his own genetic memory.  He left your home early because I was going to be helping him with this last book and he was concerned that with all the un-needed comments that he was receiving from Charles would have slowed his progress unnecessarily so to the point of great frustration for and he didn't feel that he should have been in your home with all the frustration that was already present in your own relationship with Charles.  In any case, I just want you to know that my take on this concept of unconditional love does not always apply to an intimate situation as in a marriage.  I had never expressed it quite like that of Lamah's own statement of unconditional love, but I fully understand and accept his statement, "I'll love you unconditionally as long as you meet my conditions!"  In that world of neighbors there are NO conditions that requires anyone to meet as we are all most naturally expected to being so different.  In a personal relationship such as in a marriage, there are some conditions that need to be discussed before a marriage is ever consummated as might be the case of personal habits and then there are those conditions that should apply in every marriage whether they are actually discussed beforehand, and they may include in particular the element of respect that is absolutely needed before one can actually love the other.  In the case where this mutual respect is lacking, there is a strong case for the actual annulment of the marriage as was the very case of Moses having the right to dissolve a marriage in the case of "the hardening of one's heart."  It has little or nothing to do with the actual beliefs that each may have whether they be true or not, but if the difference is of a major concern that both parties or at least one of the parties is totally unable to resolve satisfactorily, then it is quite OK with me and my own way of thinking to even suggest that there be a satisfactory reason to actually dissolve the marriage; I believe, that in your case you might call this act to dissolve, a divorce.  You might consider this as a realistic option to your own present situation.  It would be my hope that any true friend or family would understand this as I do and that there should be no loss of friends or family. In any case, please know that I would still love you even if I were still alive and I would happen to be your friend as is the case with Lamah.  Please go forth my good lady in peace, love and the truth.

                                                                            Amen, Amen, Amen,

                                                                                      In Truth,

                                                                                               Jesus

                                                                                        CONTINUE TO NEXT QUESTION